-
3
-
-
85032296454
-
-
10.1016/B0-08-043748-6/06199-5
-
R. E. P. Winpenny, Comp. Coord. Chem. II 7, 125 (2004). 10.1016/B0-08-043748-6/06199-5
-
(2004)
Comp. Coord. Chem. II
, vol.7
, pp. 125
-
-
Winpenny, R.E.P.1
-
5
-
-
34247857589
-
-
10.1039/b615543j
-
M. Affronte, S. Carretta, G. A. Timco, and R. E. P. Winpenny, Chem. Commun. (Cambridge) 2007, 1789 (2007). 10.1039/b615543j
-
(2007)
Chem. Commun. (Cambridge)
, vol.2007
, pp. 1789
-
-
Affronte, M.1
Carretta, S.2
Timco, G.A.3
Winpenny, R.E.P.4
-
6
-
-
33745655195
-
-
10.1039/b603738k
-
M. Evangelisti, F. Luis, L. J. de Jongh, and M. Affronte, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 2534 (2006). 10.1039/b603738k
-
(2006)
J. Mater. Chem.
, vol.16
, pp. 2534
-
-
Evangelisti, M.1
Luis, F.2
De Jongh, L.J.3
Affronte, M.4
-
8
-
-
33746476526
-
-
{Fe8} cubane abbreviates the compound with the chemical formula [Fe 8 III O4 (sao) 8 (py) 4]. It is prepared using the ligand salicylaldoxime (saoH2; IUPAC name: 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde oxime) [10.1021/ic0607843
-
{Fe8} cubane abbreviates the compound with the chemical formula [Fe 8 III O4 (sao) 8 (py) 4]. It is prepared using the ligand salicylaldoxime (saoH2; IUPAC name: 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde oxime) [I. A. Gass, C. J. Milios, A. G. Whittaker, F. P. A. Fabiani, S. Parsons, M. Murrie, S. P. Perlepes, and E. K. Brechin, Inorg. Chem. 45, 5281 (2006)]. 10.1021/ic0607843
-
(2006)
Inorg. Chem.
, vol.45
, pp. 5281
-
-
Gass, I.A.1
Milios, C.J.2
Whittaker, A.G.3
Fabiani, F.P.A.4
Parsons, S.5
Murrie, M.6
Perlepes, S.P.7
Brechin, E.K.8
-
9
-
-
36048965794
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.76.172406
-
L. Engelhardt, I. A. Gass, C. J. Milios, E. K. Brechin, M. Murrie, R. Prozorov, M. Vannette, and M. Luban, Phys. Rev. B 76, 172406 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.172406
-
(2007)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.76
, pp. 172406
-
-
Engelhardt, L.1
Gass, I.A.2
Milios, C.J.3
Brechin, E.K.4
Murrie, M.5
Prozorov, R.6
Vannette, M.7
Luban, M.8
-
10
-
-
70349915196
-
-
The existence of a second predicted level crossing at 81 T is due to the fact that in zero field the next higher level has S=2 with an energy 164 K above the lowest S=0 level (Ref.). This could not be tested, as it is outside the current range of our experimental facilities.
-
The existence of a second predicted level crossing at 81 T is due to the fact that in zero field the next higher level has S=2 with an energy 164 K above the lowest S=0 level (Ref.). This could not be tested, as it is outside the current range of our experimental facilities.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
70349903740
-
-
The measured magnetization versus field was independently calibrated using a standard sample, and it was found that the value of the magnetization at 55 T and 1.3 K was indeed 2 μB /f.u., in agreement with theory.
-
The measured magnetization versus field was independently calibrated using a standard sample, and it was found that the value of the magnetization at 55 T and 1.3 K was indeed 2 μB /f.u., in agreement with theory.
-
-
-
|