Patent priority network: Linking patent portfolio to strategic goals

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2353-2361

  Su, Fang Pei ^a   Lai, Kuei Kuei ^b   Sharma, R R K ^c   Kuo, Tsung Hsien ^d  

^a SHU TE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^d CHINESE CULTURE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS STRATEGY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; DECISION ANALYSIS MODEL; OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE; PATENT PORTFOLIO; PATENT STRATEGY; STRATEGIC GOALS;

COMPETITION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; MANAGERS; QUALITY CONTROL; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 70349931577     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21169     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allison, J.R., Lemley, M.A., Moore, K.A., & Trunkey, R.D. (2004). Valuable patents. Georgetown Law Journal, 92, 435-494. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://ssm.com/abstract=426020
2. Breitzman, A.F., & Mogee, M.E. (2002). The many applications of patent analysis. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 187-205.
3. Chen, C., & Carr, L. (1999). Trailblazing the literature of hypertext: Author co-citation analysis (1989-1998). Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference Hypertext Darmstadt, Germany (pp. 51-60). New York: ACM Press.
4. Cronin, B. (1996). Planning an international patent filing strategy: Cost, cashflow and capacity to succeed. Public draft presented for the ESC at the European Patent Office. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from http://www3. interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/117356325/PDFSTART.
5. Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, May/June, 20-32.
6. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for sciences. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.
7. Hall, B.H. (1999). Innovation and market value. NBER Working Paper No. 6984, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau ofEconomic Research.
8. Hall, B.H., Jaffe A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A First Look. Working Paper No. 00-277. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Department of Economics.
9. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics. 36(1), 16-38.
10. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F.M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 33(2), 1343-1363.
11. Hummon, N.P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11, 39-63.
12. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 143-155.
13. Pegels, C.C., & Thirumurthy, M.V., (1996). The impact of technology strategy on firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43, 246-249.
14. Podolny, J.M., Stuart, T.E., & Hannan, M.T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 659-689.
15. Price, D.J.D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
16. Putnam, J. (1996). The value of international patent rights. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Yale University.
17. Robinson, C., Boyle P., & Al-Jurf, S. (2005). Court finds patent creates presumption of market power in antirust tying actions. Washington Legal Foundation, 15(6). Last retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://www.wlf. org/upload/031105LOLRobinson.pdf.
18. Simmons, E.S. (2009). "Black sheep" in the patent family. World Information Patent, 31, 11-18.
19. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., & Van Zeebroeck, N. (2008). A brief history of space and time: The scope-year index as a patent value indicator based on families and renewals. Scientometrics, 75(2), 319-338.