New ground motion attenuation relations for North-Eastern Italy and their application to the regional seismic hazard assessment

Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata

Volumn 49, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 315-327

  Slejko, D ^a   Bragato, P L ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI OCEANOGRAFIA E DI GEOFISICA SPERIMENTALE OGS   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349900718     PISSN: 00066729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ambraseys N.N., Simpson K.A. and Bommer J.J.; 1996: Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25, 371-400.
2. Ambraseys N.N., Douglas J., Sarma S.K. and Smit P.M.; 2005: Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull. Earthquake Engineering, 3, 1-53. (Pubitemid 40550640)
3. Bender B. and Perkins D.M.; 1987: Seisrisk III: a computer program for seismic hazard estimation. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1772, 48 pp.
4. Bragato, P.L.; 2004: Regression analysis with truncated samples and its application to ground-motion attenuation studies. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 94, 1369-1378.
5. Bragato P.L. and Slejko D.; 2005: Empirical ground motion attenuation relations for the eastern Alps in the magnitude range 2.5-6.3. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 95, 252-276.
6. BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council); 1997: NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Part 1 - Provisions. BSSC, Washington D.C., 337 pp.
7. Camassi R. and Stucchi M.; 1997: NT4.1, a parametric catalogue of damaging earthquakes in the Italian area (release NT4.1.1). GNDT, Milano, 66+XXVII pp.
8. CEN (Comitè Europèen de Normalisation); 2002: Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Draft No 5, Doc CEN/T250/SC8/N317, CEN, Brussels, 100 pp.
9. Cornell C.A.; 1968: Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 1583-1606.
10. Douglas J. and Smit P.M.; 2001: How accurate can strong motion attenuation relations be? Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 1917-1923.
11. Douglas J.; 2004: An investigation of analysis of variance as a tool for exploring regional differences in strong ground motion. J. of Seismology, 8, 485-496.
12. Gruppo di Lavoro; 2004: Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall'Ordinanza PCM del 20 marzo 2003. Rapporto conclusivo per il Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano - Roma, 65 pp. + 5 App.
13. Malagnini L., Akinci A., Herman R.B., Pino N.A. and Scognamiglio L.; 2002: Characteristics of the ground motion in northeastern Italy. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 2186-2204.
14. Montaldo V., Faccioli E., Zonno G., Akinci A. and Malagnini L.; 2005: Treatment of ground motion predictive relationships for the reference seismic hazard map of Italy. J. of Seismology, 9, 295-316
15. Rebez A. and Slejko D.; 2004: Introducing epistemic uncertanties into seismic hazard assessment for the broader Vittorio Veneto area (NE Italy). Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl, 45, 305-320.
16. Sabetta F. and Pugliese A.; 1987: Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from Italian strong-motion records. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 77, 1491-1513.
17. Slejko D., Rebez A. and Santulin M.; 2008: Seismic hazard estimates for the Vittorio Veneto broader area (NE Italy). Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl., 49, 329-356.
18. SSHAC; 1997: Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. NUREG/CR-6372, Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab., Livermore, 256 pp.