Differential expression of candidate salt-tolerance genes in the halophyte Helianthus Paradoxus and its glycophyte progenitors H. Annuus and H. Petiolaris (Asteraceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1830-1838

  Edelist, Cécile ^a   Raffoux, Xavier ^a   Falque, Matthieu ^a   Dillmann, Christine ^a   Sicard, Delphine ^a   Rieseberg, Loren H ^b   Karrenberg, Sophie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Asteraceae; Gene expression; Habitat adaptation; Helianthus annuus; Helianthus paradoxus; Helianthus petiolaris; Salinity; Salt tolerance genes; Semiquantitative RT PCR

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CALCIUM; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GERMINATION; GROWTH RESPONSE; HALOPHYTE; HYBRID; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POTASSIUM; REAL TIME; SALINITY TOLERANCE;

ASTERACEAE; HELIANTHUS; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; HELIANTHUS PARADOXUS; HELIANTHUS PETIOLARIS;

EID: 70349898390     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900067     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bartels, D., and R. Sunkar. 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24: 23-58.
2. Buerkle, C. A., and L. H. Rieseberg. 2008. The rate of genome stabilization in homoploid hybrid species. Evolution 62: 266-275.
3. Bush, J. K., and O. W. Van Auken. 2004. Relative competitive ability of Helianthus paradoxus and its progenitors, H. annuus and H. petiolaris (Asteraceae), in varying soil salinities. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 303-310.
4. Chen, W. Q., N. J. Provart, J. Glazebrook, F. Katagiri, H. S. Chang, T. Eulgem, F. Mauch, et al. 2002. Expression profile matrix of Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 14: 559-574.
5. Chen, W. Q. J., and T. Zhu. 2004. Networks of transcription factors with roles in environmental stress response. Trends in Plant Science 9: 591-596.
6. Cochran, W. G., and G. M. Cox. 1957. Experimental designs. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
7. Cramer, G. R. 2002. Sodium-calcium interactions under salinity stress. In A. L ä uchli and U. L üttge [eds.], Salinity: Environment - plants - molecules, 205-227. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
8. Edelist, C., C. Lexer, C. Dillmann, D. Sicard, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2006. Microsatellite signature of ecological selection for salt tolerance in a wild sunflower hybrid species, Helianthus paradoxus. Molecular Ecology 15: 4623-4634.
9. Fernandez, P., J. Di Rienzo, L. Fernandez, H. E. Hopp, N. Paniego, and R. A. Heinz. 2008. Transcriptomic identification of candidate genes involved in sunflower responses to chilling and salt stresses based on cDNA microarray analysis. BMC Plant Biology 8: 11.
10. Flowers, T. J., and T. D. Colmer. 2008. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist 179: 945-963.
11. 2+-ATPases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Biomembranes 1465: 52-78.
12. Geisler, M., N. Frangne, E. Gomes, E. Martinoia, and M. G. Palmgren. 2000b. The ACA4 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a vacuolar membrane calcium pump that improves salt tolerance in yeast. Plant Physiology 124: 1814-1827.
13. Hoekstra, H. E., and J. A. Coyne. 2007. The locus of evolution: Evodevo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61: 995-1016.
14. Holliday, J. A., S. G. Ralph, R. White, J. Bohlmann, and S. N. Aitken. 2008. Global monitoring of autumn gene expression within and among phenotypically divergent populations of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). New Phytologist 178: 103-122.
15. Karrenberg, S., C. Edelist, C. Lexer, and L. Rieseberg. 2006. Response to salinity in the homoploid hybrid species Helianthus paradoxus and its progenitors H. annuus and H. petiolaris. New Phytologist 170: 615-629.
16. Karrenberg, S., C. Lexer, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2007. Reconstructing the history of selection during homoploid hybrid speciation. American Naturalist 169: 725-737.
17. Karrenberg, S., and A. Widmer. 2008. Ecologically relevant genetic variation from a non-Arabidopsis perspective. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11: 156-162.
18. Kaya, C., D. Higgs, and E. Sakar. 2002. Response of two leafy vegetables grown at high salinity to supplementary potassium and phosphorus during different growth stages. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25: 2663-2676.
19. Lai, Z., B. L. Gross, Y. I. Zou, J. Andrews, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2006. Microarray analysis reveals differential gene expression in hybrid sunflower species. Molecular Ecology 15: 1213-1227.
20. Lai, Z., N. C. Kane, Y. Zou, and L. H. Rieseberg.2008. Naturalvariation in gene expression between wild and weedy populations of Helianthus annuus. Genetics 179: 1881-1890.
21. Lai, Z., K. Livingstone, Y. Zou, S. A. Church, S. J. Knapp, J. Andrews, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2005. Identification and mapping of SNPs from ESTs in sunflower. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 1532-1544.
22. Lexer, C., Z. Lai, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2004. Candidate gene polymorphisms associated with salt tolerance in wild sunflower hybrids: Implications for the origin of Helianthus paradoxus, a diploid hybrid species. New Phytologist 161: 225-233.
23. Lexer, C., M. E. Welch, J. L. Durphy, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2003a. Natural selection for salt tolerance quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in wild sunflower hybrids: Implications for the origin of Helianthus paradoxus, a diploid hybrid species. Molecular Ecology 12: 1225-1235.
24. Lexer, C., M. E. Welch, O. Raymond, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2003b. The origin of ecological divergence in Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae): Selection on transgressive characters in a novel hybrid habitat. Evolution 57: 1989-2000.
25. Liu, X., and W. V. Baird. 2004. Identification of a novel gene, HaABRC5, from Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae) that is upregulated in response to drought, salinity, and ascorbic acid. American Journal of Botany 91: 184-191.
26. Maathuis, F. J. M. 2006. The role of monovalent cation transporters in plant responses to salinity. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1137-1147.
27. Mäser, P., M. Gierth, and J. I. Schroeder. 2002. Molecular mechanisms of potassium and sodium uptake in plants. Plant and Soil 247: 43-54.
28. Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 239-250.
29. Munns, R. 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: Bringing them together. New Phytologist 167: 645-663.
30. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria.
31. Rieseberg, L. H. 1991. Homoploid reticulate evolution in Helianthus (Asteraceae): Evidence from ribosomal genes. American Journal of Botany 78: 1218-1237.
32. Rieseberg, L. H., O. Raymond, D. M. Rosenthal, Z. Lai, K. Livingstone, T. Nakazato, J. L. Durphy, et al. 2003. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301: 1211-1216.
33. Roelofs, D., M. G. M. Aarts, H. Schat, and N. M. van Straalen. 2008. Functional ecological genomics to demonstrate general and specific responses to abiotic stress. Functional Ecology 22: 8-18.
34. Rogers, C. E., T. E. Thompson, and G. E. Seiler. 1982. Sunflower species of the United States. National Sunflower Association, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
35. Rosenthal, D. M., A. M. Schwarzbach, L. A. Donovan, O. Raymond, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2002. Phenotypic differentiation between three ancient and hybrid taxa and their parental species. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 387-398.
36. Rundle, H. D., and P. Nosil.2005. Ecologicalspeciation.Ecology Letters 8: 336-352.
37. Sanchez, D. H., F. Lippold, H. Redestig, M. A. Hannah, A. Erban, U. Kramer, J. Kopka, and M. K. Udvardi. 2008. Integrative functional genomics of salt acclimatization in the model legume Lotus japonicus. Plant Journal 53: 973-987.
38. + transporters is regulated in response to salinity stress in common ice plant. Plant Physiology 129: 1482-1493.
39. Taji, T., M. Seki, M. Satou, T. Sakurai, M. Kobayashi, K. Ishiyama, Y. Narusaka, et al. 2004. Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray. Plant Physiology 135: 1697-1709.
40. Tanji, K. K. 2002. Salinity in the soil environment. In A. L ä uchli and U. Lüttge [eds.], Salinity: Environment-Plants-Molecules, 21-52. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
41. + transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany 91: 503-527.
42. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S-Plus. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
43. 2+ dependent protein kinases (CDPK s) genes under different environmental stresses. FEBS Letters 581: 1179-1189.
44. Welch, M. E., and L. H. Rieseberg. 2002. Habitat divergence between a homoploid hybrid sunflower species, Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae), and its progenitors. American Journal of Botany 89: 472-478.
45. Whitehead, A., and D. L. Crawford. 2006. Neutral and adaptive variation in gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 5425-5430.
46. 2+-ATPase - Primary structure and regulation of messenger-RNA abundance by salt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89: 9205-9209.