Who Says Three's a Crowd? Using a Cognitive Tutor to Support Peer Tutoring

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 158, Issue , 2007, Pages 399-406

  Walker, Erin ^a   McLaren, Bruce M ^a   Rummel, Nikol ^b   Koedinger, Ken ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

collaborative learning; intelligent tutoring systems; Peer tutoring

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

COGNITIVE MODEL; COGNITIVE TUTORS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INTELLIGENT TUTORS; PEER TUTORING; STUDENT COLLABORATION; TUTORING SYSTEM;

STUDENTS;

EID: 70349872065     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
2. Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
3. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 23-37). New York: Praeger.
4. Ritter, S., Blessing, S. B., & Hadley, W. S. (2002). SBIR Phase I Final Report 2002. Department of Education. Department ofEducation RFP ED: 84-305S.
5. Kollar, I ., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (in press). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review.
6. Harrer, A., McLaren, B. M., Walker, E., Bollen, L., and Sewall, J. (2006). Creating Cognitive Tutors for Collaborative Learning: Steps Toward Realization. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research (UMUAI), vol 16, nos.3-4, 175-209.
7. Soller, A. L. (2001). Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40-62.
8. Biswas, G., Schwartz, D. L., Leelawong, K., Vye, N., & TAG-V. (2005). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19, 363-392.
9. Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331-339.
10. King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal o/Educational Psychology, 90, 134-152.
11. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C.L., Owen, R., & Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies.
12. Webb, N.M., Troper, J.D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.
13. Walker, E., Rummel, N., McLaren, B. M., and Koedinger. K. R. The Student Becomes the Master: Peer Tutoring in the Cognitive Tutor Algebra. To appear as a short paper to CSCL07.
14. Walker, E., Koedinger, K. R., McLaren, B. M. and Rummel, N. (2006). Cognitive Tutors as Research Platforms: Extending an Established Tutoring System for Collaborative and Metacognitive Experimentation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.