The influence of context on deliberation and cooperation in community-based forest management in Ontario, Canada

Human Ecology

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 547-558

  Robson, Mark ^a   Kant, Shashi ^b  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognitive mapping; Context; Cooperation; Deliberation; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECENTRALIZATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; NETWORK ANALYSIS; SPATIAL COGNITION; STAKEHOLDER;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 70349871332     PISSN: 03007839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-009-9251-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agrawal, A. (2002). Common resources and institutional sustainability. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S. & Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 41-85.
2. Baland, J. M., and Platteau, J. P. (1996). Halting Degradation of Natural Resources. Clarendon, Oxford.
3. Banxia Software Ltd. (2002). Decision Explorer Student Version 3.2.3. Cumbria, Kendal.
4. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
5. Brightman, J. R. (2003). Mapping methods for qualitative data structuring (QDS). Paper presented at the Strategies in qualitative research: Methodological issues and practices using QSR NVivo and NUDIST conference, London, UK.
6. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. C. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302(5652): 1907-1912.
7. Eden, C., and Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy the Journey of Strategic management. Sage, London.
8. Fielding, N. G., and Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research. Sage, London.
9. Gower, J. C., and Ross, G. J. S. (1990). Minimum Spanning Trees and Single Linkage Cluster Analysis. Applied Statistics 18: 56-64.
10. Hunt, L. M., and McFarlane, B. L. (2002). Views about forest management in Ontario: Highlights from surveys with the Ontario public (No. CNFER Technical Report TR-010). Ont. Min. Natur. Resour, Thunder Bay.
11. Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems a Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4): 412-423.
12. Jackson, L. S. (2001). Contemporary Public Involvement: Toward a Strategic Approach. Local Environment 6(2): 135-147.
13. Jentoft, S., McCay, B. J., and Wilson, D. C. (1998). Social Theory and Fisheries Co-Management. Marine Policy 22(4-5): 423-436.
14. Mendoza, G. A., and Prabhu, R. (2005). Combining Participatory Modeling and Multi-criteria Analysis for Community-Based Forest Management. Forest Ecology and Management 207(1-2): 145-156.
15. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, London.
16. MNR. (2002). State of the forest report, 2001: Ministry of Natural Resources.
17. Nicolini, D. (1999). Comparing Methods for Mapping Organizational Cognition. Organization Studies 20(5): 833-860.
18. Nilsson, S. (2000). Challenges for the boreal forest zone and IBFRA (No. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-209). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Res. Stn, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
19. Ostrom, E., and Wertime, M. B. (1998). IFRI research strategy. In Gibson, C., McKean, M. A. and Ostrom, E. (eds.), Forest Resources and Institutions, FAO, Rome, pp. 217.
20. QSR International Pty Ltd. (2000). QSR NUD*IST 5. Melbourne, Australia.
21. Robson, M., and Kant, S. (2007). The Development of Government Agency and Stakeholder Cooperation: A Comparative Study of Two Local Citizens Committees' (LCCs) Participation in Forest Management in Ontario, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 9(8): 1113-1133.
22. Robson, M., Hawley, A., and Robinson, D. (2000). Comparing the Social Values of Forest-Dependent, Provincial and National Publics for Socially Sustainable Forest Management. Forestry Chronicle 76(4): 615-622.
23. Ross, M. M. (1997). A History of Forest Legislation in Canada 1867-1996 (No. 2). Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Calgary.
24. Shindler, B., Cheek, K. A., and Stankey, G. H. (1999). Monitoring and Evaluating Citizen-Agency Interactions: A Framework Developed for Adaptive Management (No. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-452): USDA Forest Service, Pacific NW Research Station.
25. Singleton, S., and Taylor, M. (1992). Common Property, Collective Action and Community. Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(3): 309-324.
26. Smith, P. (1996). Aboriginal Participation in Forest Management: Not Just Another "Stakeholder". [Editorial]. Forestry Chronicle 72(1): 2-5.
27. Statistics Canada. (2002). 2001 Community Profiles. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
28. Waage, S. (2003). Collaborative Salmon Recovery Planning: Examining Decision Making and Implementation in Northeastern Oregon. Society & Natural Resources 16(4): 295-307.
29. Wade, R. (1988). Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and Organizational Cognition-Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane. Organization Science 6(3): 280-321.
31. Wang, S. H. (1996). A Dynamic Perspective of Differences between Cognitive Maps. Journal of the Operational Research Society 47(4): 538-549.