Empirical comparison of g matrix test statistics: Finding biologically relevant change

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2627-2635

  Calsbeek, Brittny ^a,b   Goodnight, Charles J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Paul Sabatier University   (France)

Author keywords

Breeder's equation; G matrix evolution; Matrix comparison; Selection skewers

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BEETLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EIGENVALUE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; NATURAL SELECTION;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM;

EID: 70349866667     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00735.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arnold, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140 : S85 S107.
2. Arnold, S. J., and P. C. Phillips. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53 : 1516 1527.
3. Arnold, S. J., R. Burger, P. A. Hohenlohe, B. C. Ajie, and A. G. Jones. 2008. Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution 62 : 2451 2461.
4. Ayres, F. A., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. Behavioral variation in natural-populations.4. Mendelian models and heritability of a feeding response in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Heredity 51 : 405 413.
5. Badyaev, A. V., and G. E. Hill. 2000. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the house finch. I. Population divergence in morphological covariance structure. Evolution 54 : 1784 1794.
6. Begin, M., and D. A. Roff. 2003. The constancy of the G matrix through species divergence and the effects of quantitative genetic constraints on phenotypic evolution: a case study in crickets. Evolution 57 : 1107 1120.
7. Cano, J. M., A. Laurila, J. Palo, and J. Merila. 2004. Population differentiation in G matrix structure due to natural selection in Rana temporaria. Evolution 58 : 2013 2020.
8. Cheverud, J. M. 1996. Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cotton-top (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle-back (S. fuscicollis) tamarins. J. Evol. Biol. 9 : 5 42.
9. Cheverud, J. M., and G. Marroig. 2007. Comparing covariance matrices: random skewers method compared to the common principal components model. Genet. Mol. Biol. 30 : 461 469.
10. Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group Ltd, New York, NY.
11. Flury, B. 1988. Common principal components and related multivariate models. Wiley, New York, NY.
12. Garant, D., J. D. Hadfield, L. E. B. Kruuk, and B. C. Sheldon. 2008. Stability of genetic variance and covariance for reproductive characters in the face of climate change in a wild bird population. Mol. Ecol. 17 : 179 188.
13. Goodnight, C. J., and J. M. Schwartz. 1997. A bootstrap comparison of genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 53 : 1026 1039.
14. Guillaume, F., and M. C. Whitlock. 2007. Effects of migration on the genetic covariance matrix. Evolution 61 : 2398 2409.
15. Hartl, D. 2000. A primer of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
16. Hohenlohe, P. A., and S. J. Arnold. 2008. MIPoD: A hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence. Am. Nat. 171 : 366 385.
17. Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold, and R. Borger. 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57 : 1747 1760.
18. Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold, and R. Burger. 2004. Evolution and stability of the G-matrix on a landscape with a moving optimum. Evolution 58 : 1639 1654.
19. Kingsolver, J. G. H., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157 : 245 261.
20. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33 : 402 416.
21. Lee, C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 386 391.
22. McGuigan, K., S. F. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2005. Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance. Am. Nat. 165 : 32 43.
23. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53 : 1506 1515.
24. Phillips, P. C., M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler. 2001. Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158 : 1137 1145.
25. R Core Development Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
26. Revell, L. J. 2007. The G matrix under fluctuating correlational mutation and selection. Evolution 61 : 1857 1872.
27. Roff, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
28. Roff, D. A., and T. A. Mousseau. 1999. Does natural selection alter genetic architecture? An evaluation of quantitative genetic variation among populations of Allonemobius socius and A. fasciatus. J. Evol. Biol. 12 : 361 369.
29. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 320 327.
30. Strang, G. 2003. Introduction to linear algebra. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Wellesley, MA.