The role of the sediment budget in understanding debris flow susceptibility

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1612-1624

  Dong, Jia Jyun ^a   Lee, Chyi Tyi ^a   Tung, Yu Hsiang ^a   Liu, Chia Nan ^b   Lin, Kuang Ping ^a   Lee, Jiin Fa ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHI NAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Debris flow; Landslide; Sediment budget; Susceptibility analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS RESULTS; CHICHI EARTHQUAKE; DEBRIS FLOWS; DISCRIMINANT MODELS; PREDICTION RATE; SEDIMENT BUDGETS; SHALLOW LANDSLIDE; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; SOURCE AREA; SUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION; TEMPORAL VARIATION; TIME PERIODS;

BUDGET CONTROL; EARTHQUAKES; HURRICANES; LANDFORMS; LANDSLIDES; SEDIMENTOLOGY; WATERSHEDS;

DEBRIS;

CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE 1999; DEBRIS FLOW; LANDSLIDE; SEDIMENT BUDGET; TEMPORAL VARIATION; TYPHOON; WATERSHED;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; TAIWAN;

EID: 70349860131     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1850     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Baeza C, Corominas J. 2001. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26: 1251-1263.
2. Bianco G, Franzi L. 2000. Estimation of debris flow volumes from storm events. In Debris-flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (eds). A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam; 441-448.
3. Bovis MJ, Jakob M. 1999. The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris flow activity. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24: 1039-1054.
4. Caine N. 1980. The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geografiska Annaler 62A: 23-27.
5. Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman TY. 2005. Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 72: 250-271.
6. Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Rupert MG, Michael JA, Djokic D, Sreedhar S. 2003. Emergency Assessment of Debris-flow Hazards from Basins Burned by the Grand Prix and Old Fires of 2003, Southern California. US Geological Survey Open-file Report 03-475. US Geological Survey: Reston, VA.
7. Carrara A. 1983. Multivariate models for landslide hazard evaluation. Mathematical Geology 15(3): 403-426.
8. Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F. 1992. Uncertainly in assessing hazard and risk. ITC Journal 2: 172-183.
9. Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P. 2008. Comparing models of debris- flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94: 353-378.
10. Central Geological Survey. 2006. Geological Investigation of Debris Flow, Taiwan Central Geological Survey Report. Central Geological Survey: Taipei (in Chinese).
11. Chang KJ, Taboada A, Chan YC. 2005. Geological and morphological study of the Jiufengershan landslide triggered by the Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake. Geomorphology 71: 293-309.
12. Chang KT, Chiang SH, Hsu ML. 2007a. Modeling typhoon- and earthquake-induced landslides in a mountainous watershed using logistic regression. Geomorphology 89: 335-347.
13. Chang KT, Chiang SH, Lei F. 2007b. Analysing the relationship between typhoon-triggered landslides and critical rainfall conditions. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 33: 1261-1271.
14. Chang TC, Chao RJ. 2006. Application of back-propagation networks in debris flow prediction. Engineering Geology 85: 270-280.
15. Charlton M, Large ARG, Fuller IC. 2003. Application of airborne LiDAR in river environments: the River Coquet, Northumberland, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28: 299-306.
16. Chen CC, Tseng CY, Dong JJ. 2007. New entropy based method for variables selection and its application to the debris-flow hazard assessment. Engineering Geology 94: 19-26.
17. Chen RF, Chang KJ, Angelier J, Chan YC, Deffontaines B, Lee CT, Lin ML. 2006. Topographical changes revealed by high-resolution airborne LiDAR data: the 1999 Tsaoling landslide induced by the Chi-Chi earthquake. Engineering Geology 88: 160-172.
18. Cheng JD, Huang YC, Wu HL, Yeh JL, Chang CH. 2005. Hydrometeorological and landuse attributes of debris flows and debris floods during typhoon Toraji, July 29-30, 2001 in central Taiwan. Journal of Hydrology 306: 161-173.
19. Council of Agriculture. 2001. The Hazard Evaluation of Debris-flow Stream in Central Taiwan After Typhoon Toraji, Taiwan Council of Agriculture Report. Taipei: Council of Agriculture (in Chinese).
20. Council of Agriculture. 2003. Map of Streams with High Potential of Occurring Debris Flow (1/250,000), Taipei, Taiwan. Taipei: Council of Agriculture.
21. Dadson SJ, Hovius N, Chen H, Dade WB, Lin J, Hsu M, Lin C, Horng M, Chen T, Milliman J, Stark CP. 2004. Earthquake-triggered increase in sediment delivery from an active mountain belt. Geology 32: 733-736.
22. Davis JC. 2002. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, 3rd edition. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 638 pp.
23. Decaulne A, Sæmundsson P. 2007. Spatial and temporal diversity for debris-flow meteorological control in subarctic oceanic periglacial environments in Iceland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 1971-1983.
24. de Vente J, Poesen J, Bazzoffi P, Van Rompaey A, Verstraeten G. 2006. Predicting catchment sediment yield in Mediterranean environments: the importance of sediments sources and connectivity in Italian drainage basins. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31: 1017-1034.
25. Franzi L, Bianco G. 2001. A statistical method to predict debris flow deposited volumes on a debris fan. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (C) 26: 683-688.
26. French JR. 2003. Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28: 321-335.
27. Guthrie RH, Evans SG. 2004. Analysis of landslide frequencies and characteristics in a natural system, Coastal British Columbia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29: 1321-1339.
28. Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Rossi M, Valigi D. 2009. Landslide volumes and landslide mobilization rates in Umbria, central Italy. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 279: 222-229.
29. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M. 2006. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81: 166-184.
30. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F. 2005. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72: 272-299.
31. He YP, Xie H, Cui P, Wei FQ, Zhong DL, Gardner JS. 2003. GIS- based hazard mapping and zonation of debris flows in Xiaojiang Basin, southwestern China. Environmental Geology 45: 286-293.
32. Helsen MM, Koop PJM, van Steijn H. 2002. Magnitude-frequency relationship for debris flows on the fan of the Chalance torrent, Valgaudemar (French Alps). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 1299-1307.
33. Ho CS. 1975. An introduction to the geology of Taiwan, explanatory text of the geologic map of Taiwan. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Republic of China.
34. Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R. 1984. Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazard for design of remedial measures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 21(4): 663-677.
35. Innes JL. 1983. Lichenometric dating of debris-flow deposits in the Scottish Highlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 8: 579-588.
36. Iovine G, Di Gregorio S, Lupiano V. 2003. Assessing debris flow susceptibility. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment, Vol. 1, Rickenmann D, Cheng-lung C (eds). Millpress: Rotterdam; 623-634.
37. Jakob M, Hungr O. 2005. Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena. Springer-Praxis: Chichester; 739 pp.
38. Jakob M, Bovis M, Oden M. 2005. The significance of channel recharge rates for estimating debris-flow magnitude and frequency. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30: 755-766.
39. Johnson RM, Warburton J. 2002. Annual sediment budget of a UK mountain torrent. Geografiska Annaler 84A(2): 73-88.
40. Klecka WR. 1980. Discriminant Analysis, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-019. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 71 pp.
41. Lee CT, Huang CC, Lee JF, Pan KL, Lin ML, Dong JJ. 2008a. Statistical approach to earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility. Engineering Geology 100: 43-58.
42. Lee CT, Huang CC, Lee JF, Pan KL, Lin ML, Dong JJ. 2008b. Statistical approach to storm event-induced landslides susceptibility. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 8: 941-960.
43. Lee JF. 2000. Explanatory text of the geologic map of Taiwan, 1:50000, sheet 18, Tungshih. Taipei: Taiwan Central Geological Survey.
44. Liao HW, Lee CT. 2000. Landsides triggered by the Chi-Chi earthquake. Proceedings of the 21st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 1&2; 383-388.
45. Lin CW, Liu SH, Lee SY, Liu CC. 2006. Impacts of the Chi-Chi earthquake on subsequent rainfall-induced landslides in central Taiwan. Engineering Geology 86: 87-101.
46. Lin CW, Wu MC, Shieh CL, Shieh YC. 2000. Influence of geology on debris-flows: examples from Hsin-Yi, Nantou County, Taiwan. In Debris-flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (eds). A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam; 169-176.
47. Lin CW, Shieh CL, Yuan BD, Shieh YC, Liu SH, Lee SY. 2003. Impact of Chi-Chi earthquake on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows: example from the Chenyulan River watershed, Nantou, Taiwan. Engineering Geology 71: 49-61.
48. Lin ML, Jeng FS. 2000. Characteristics of hazards induced by extremely heavy rainfall in Central Taiwan - Typhoon Herb. Engineering Geology 58: 191-207.
49. Lin PS, Lin JY, Hung JC, Yang MD. 2002. Assessing debris-flow hazard in a watershed in Taiwan. Engineering Geology 66: 295-313.
50. Liu CN, Huang SF, Dong JJ. 2008. Impacts of September 21, 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake on the characteristics of gully-type debris flows in central Taiwan. Natural Hazards 47: 349-368.
51. Liu CN, Dong JJ, Peng YH, Huang HF. 2009. Effects of strong ground motion on the occurrence potential of gully type debris flows. Engineering Geology 104: 241-253.
52. Liu X, Wang S. 1996. Preliminary research of two-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on landslide and debris flow risk degree of a district. Journal of Natural Disasters 5(3): 51-59.
53. Liu Y, Guo HC, Zou R, Wang LJ. 2006. Neural network modeling for regional hazard assessment of debris flow in Lake Qionghai Watershed, China. Environmental Geology 49: 968-976.
54. Mark RK, Ellen SD. 1995. Statistical and simulation models for mapping debris-flow hazard. In Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards, Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds). Kluwer Publishers: Dordrecht; 93-106.
55. Martin Y, Rood K, Schwab JW, Church M. 2002. Sediment transfer by shallow landsliding in the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 39: 189-205.
56. Marchi L, D'Agostino V. 2004. Estimation of debris-flow magnitude in the eastern Italian Alps. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29: 207-220.
57. Morche D, Schmidt KH, Sahling I, Herkommer M, Kutschera J. 2008. Volume changes of Alpine sediment stores in a state of post-event disequilibrium and the implications for downstream hydrology and bed load transport. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 62: 89-101.
58. Neuland H. 1976. A prediction model of landslips. Catena 3: 215-230.
59. Oden ME. 1994. Debris Recharge Rates in Torrented Gullies on the Queen Charlotte Islands. Master Thesis, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia.
60. OuYang YC. 2003. The Soil Erosion of Reservoirs' Watershed: A Case Study on the Shihmen Reservoir and Feitsui Reservoir, Taiwan. Master Thesis, The Graduate Institute of Geography, National Taiwan University, Taipei (in Chinese).
61. Rickenmann D. 1999. Empirical relationships for debris flow. Natural Hazards 19: 47-77.
62. Rupert MG, Cannon SH, Gartner JE. 2003. Using Logistic Regression to Predict the Probability of Debris Flows Occurring in Areas Recently Burned by Wild Land Fires, US Geological Survey Open- file Report 03-500. US Geological Survey: Reston, VA.
63. Schrott L, Hufschmidt G, Hankammer M, Hoffmann T, Dikau R. 2003. Spatial distribution of sediment storage types and quanti- fication of valley fill deposits in an alpine basin, Reintal, Bavarian Alps, Germany. Geomorphology 55: 45-63.
64. Schuerch P, Densmore AL, McArdell BW, Molnar P. 2006. The influence of landsliding on sediment supply and channel change in a steep mountain catchment. Geomorphology 78: 222-235.
65. Su J, Zhou X, Fan S. 1993. A fuzzy set evaluation method of hazard degree of debris flow. Journal of Natural Disasters 2(2): 83-90.
66. Swets JA. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagonstic systems. Science 204(4857): 1285-1293.
67. Takei A. 1984. Interdependence of sediment budget between individual torrents and a river-system. International Symposium Interpraevent, Villach, Austria; 35-48.
68. Toyos G, Dorta DO, Oppenheimer C, Pareschi MT, Sulpizio R, Zanchetta G. 2007. GIS-assisted modelling for debris flow hazard assessment based on the events of May 1998 in the area of Sarno, southern Italy: part I. Maximum run-out. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 1491-1502.
69. VanDine DF. 1985. Debris flows and debris torrents in the Southern Canadian Cordillera. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 22: 44-68.
70. Veyrat-Charvillon S, Memier M. 2006. Stereophotogrammetry of archive data and topographic approaches to debris-flow torrent measurements: calculation of channel-sediment states and a partial sediment budget for Manival torrent (Isère, France). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31: 201-219.
71. Walling DE, Russell MA, Hodgkinson RA, Zhang Y. 2002. Establishing sediment budgets for two small lowland agricultural catchments in UK. Catena 47: 323-353.