Is there a positive relationship between naturalness and genetic diversity in forest tree communities?;Existe relación positiva entre la naturalidad y la diversidad genética en comunidades de árboles forestales?

Investigacion Agraria Sistemas y Recursos Forestales

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 20-27

  Wehenkel, C ^a   Corral Rivas, J J ^a   Castellanos Bocaz, H A ^a   Pinedo Alvarez, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD JUÁREZ DEL ESTADO DE DURANGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Intermediate disturbance hypothesis; Isozyme; Permutation test; Potential Natural Vegetation; Transspecific genetic diversity

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349854713     PISSN: 11317965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2009181-01047     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ANGERMEIER P. L., 2000. The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 14, 373-381.
2. BARTHA D., 2004. Chances for a stand-level evaluation of the naturalness of forests. AFJZ 175(1-2), 8-13.
3. BERGMANN F., GREGORIUS H. R., KOWNATZKI D., WEHENKEL C., 2008. Do relationships between species and genetic diversity in forest tree communities depend on type of genetic markers and diversity measure? Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. in press.
4. CONNELL J. H., SLATYER R. O., 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111, 1119-1144.
5. ELLENBERG H., 1986. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Verlag Eugen Ulmer.
6. GOTELLI N. J., COLWELL R. K., 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4, 379-391.
7. GREGORIUS H. R., 1978. The concept of genetic diversity and its formal relationship to heterozygosity and genetic distance. Math. Biosci. 41, 253-271.
8. GREGORIUS H. R., 1987. The relationship between the concepts of genetic diversity and differentiation. TAG 74, 397-401.
9. GREGORIUS H. R., 1996. The contribution of the genetics of populations to ecosystem stability. Silvae Gen 45, 267-271.
10. GREGORIUS H.R., 2001. The notion of stability in open dynamical systems from an ecological perspective. Int. J. General Systems 30(3), 347-378.
11. GREGORIUS H. R., BERGMANN F., WEHENKEL C., 2003. Analysis of biodiversity across levels of biological organization: a problem of defining traits. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 5, 209-218.
12. HAMRICK J. L., GODT M. J. W., SHERMAN-BROYLES S. L., 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6, 95-124.
13. HILL M. O., 1973. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427-432.
14. HOFMANN G., 1995. Wald, Klima, Fremdstoffeintrag - ökologischer Wandel mit Konsequenzen für Waldbau und Naturschutz dargestellt am Gebiet der neuen Bundesländer Deutschlands. Angewandte Landschaftsökologie 4, 165-189.
15. HUNTER M. L. Jr., 1996. Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: Are human activities natural. Conserv Biol 10, 695-697.
16. JAHN G., 1995. Beitrag im Kapitel Vegetation. - In: Arbeitskreis Standortskartierung (Hrsg.). Forstliche Standortsaufnahme. 5. Aufl.
17. JUMP A.S., HUNT J.M., PEÑUELAS J., 2006. Rapid climate change-related growth decline at the southern range edge of Fagus sylvatica. Mol Ecology 12 (11), 2163-2174.
18. KLEINSCHMIT J. R. G., KOWNATZKI D., GREGORIUS H. R., 2004. Adaptational characteristics of autochthonous populations - consequences for provenance delineation. Forest Ecol Manag 197, 213-224.
19. KONNERT M., MAURER W., 1995. Isozymic investigations on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst.) and European silver fir (Abies alba Mill.): A practical guide to separation methods and zymogram evaluation. Laboratory Manual (edited by the German Fed.-St. Work Group 'Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources', 79 pp.
20. MACHADO A., 2004. An index of naturalness. J Nat Conservat 12, 95-110.
21. MANLY B. F. J., 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, 399 pp.
22. MARKUSSEN, T., TUSCH, A., STEPHAN, B.R., FLADUNG, M., 2005. Identification of molecular markers for selected wood properties of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. (Karst.). II. Extractives content. Silvae Genetica 54, 145-152.
23. NOSS R. F., 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4, 355-364.
24. STERN K., ROCHE L., 1974. Genetics of Forest Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. Stuttgart, 3. Aufl.
25. VELLEND M., GEBER M. A., 2005. Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 8, 767-781.
26. VOS P., HOGERS R., BLEEKER M. et al., 1995. AFLP: a new concept for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23, 4407-4414.
27. WEHENKEL C., 2007. Interaktion zwischen der genetischen Diversität und der Artendiversität in unterschiedlichen Baumbeständen. Cuvillier-Verlag, Göttingen.
28. WEHENKEL C., BERGMANN F., GREGORIUS H. R., 2006. Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? Plant Ecol 185,151-161.
29. WEST D. C., SHUGART H. H., BOTKIN D. B., 1981. Forest succession - concepts and application. Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.
30. ZIEHE M., HATTEMER H. H., MÜLLER-STARCK R., MÜLLER-STARCK G., 1999. Genetic structures as indicators for adaptation and adaptational potentials. In: MATYAS C. (ed.) Forest Genetics and Sustainability. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 75-89 pp.