Finding process in product: Prewriting and revision in timed essay responses

Assessing Writing

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 157-177

  Worden, Dorothy L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Prewriting; Revision; Scoring; Timed essay exam

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349850631     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bartholomae D. Inventing the university. In: Rose M. (Ed). When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing process problems (1985), Guilford, New York 134-165
2. Bizzell P. Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. PRE/TEXT 3 3 (1982) 213-243
3. Camp R. Changing the model for the direct assessment of writing. In: Williamson M.M., and Huot B.A. (Eds). Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment (1993), Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ 45-78
4. Cho Y. Assessing writing: Are we bound by only one method?. Assessing Writing 8 (2003) 165-191
5. Faigley L., and Witte S. Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication 32 (1981) 400-414
6. Flower L., and Hayes J.R. A cognitive process theory of writing. In: Villanueva V. (Ed). Cross-talk in comp theory. 2nd ed. (1981), NCTE, Urbana, IL 273-298
7. Flower L., Hayes J.R., Carey L., Schriver K., and Stratman J. Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College composition and communication 37 (1986) 16-55
8. In: Haswell R. (Ed). Beyond outcomes: Assessment and instruction within a university writing program (2001), Ablex, Westport, CT
9. Hayes J. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In: Indrisano R., and Squire J. (Eds). Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice (2000), International Reading Association, Newark, NJ 6-17
10. Huot B. Toward a new theory of writing assessment. College Composition and Communication 47 (1996) 549-566
11. James H.W. The effect of handwriting upon grading. The English Journal 16 3 (1927) 180-185
12. Klein J., and Taub D. The effect of variations in handwriting and print on evaluation of student essays. Assessing Writing 10 (2005) 134-148
13. Murray D. Teach writing as a process not product. In: Villanueva V. (Ed). Cross-talk in comp theory. 2nd ed. (1972), NCTE, Urbana, IL 3-6
14. Olson G.A. Toward a post-process composition: Abandoning the rhetoric of assertion. In: Kent T. (Ed). Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm (1999), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL 7-15
15. Reither J.A. Writing and knowing: Toward redefining the writing process. College English 47 (1985) 620-628
16. Sommers N. Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication 31 (1980) 378-388
17. Washington State University, Writing Assessment Office. (2006). Washington State University portfolio timed writing.
18. White E.M. An apologia for the timed impromptu essay test. College Composition and Communication 46 (1995) 30-45
19. Winerip, M. (2005, May 4). SAT essay test rewards length and ignores errors of fact. The New York Times late ed.
20. Wolcott W. Writing instruction and assessment: The need for interplay between process and product. College Composition and Communications 38 (1987) 40-46