Training teachers to use verbal immediacy

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 223-232

  Jensen, Karla Kay ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349835176     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099909388721     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anthony, S., 1978. Immediacy and nonimmediacy factors in communicating interpersonal attraction. Journal of Social Psychology, 93: 141-142.
2. Astin, A. W., 1993. What matters in college? Four critical years revisited, San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
3. Bradac, J. J., Bowers, J. W., and Courtright, J. A., 1979. Three language variables in communication research: Intensity, immediacy and diversity. Human Communication Research, 5: 257-269.
4. Chism, N. V., 1989. “ Large enrollment classes: Necessary evil or not necessarily evil ”. In Notes on teaching, Center for Teaching Excellence, Ohio State University.
5. Christensen, L. J., and Menzel, K. E., 1998. The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47: 82-90.
6. Christophel, D. M., and Gorham, J., 1995. A test-retest of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44: 292-306.
7. Christophel, D. M., 1990. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323-340.
8. Conville, R., 1975. Linguistic nonimmediacy and self-presentation. Journal of Psychology, 90: 219-227.
9. Cravener, P. A., 1997. Promoting active learning in a large lecture class. Nurse educator, 22: 21-25.
10. Ellis, K., 1995. Apprehension, self-perceived competency, and teacher immediacy in the laboratory-supported public speaking course: Trends and relationships. Communication Education, 44: 64-78.
11. Frymier, A. B., and Thompson, C. A., 1995. Using student reports to measure immediacy: Is it a valid methodology?. Communication Research Reports, 12: 85-93.
12. Gedeon, R., 1997. Enhancing a large lecture with active learning. Research Strategies, 15: 301-304.
13. Geske, J., 1992. Overcoming the drawbacks of the large lecture class. College Teaching, 40: 151-154.
14. Gorham, J., 1988. The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37: 40-53.
15. Gorham, J., and Christophel, D. M., 1990. The relationship of teachers’ use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39: 46-62.
16. Gorham, J., and Zakahi, W. R., 1990. A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning. Monitoring process and product. Communication Education, 39: 61-74.
17. Hensley, T. R., and Oakely, M., 1998. The challenge of the large lecture class: Making it more like a small seminar. PS Political Science Teacher, 31: 47-53.
18. Holsti, O. R., 1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesely Publishing.
19. Mehrabian, A., 1971. Silent messages, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20. Mehrabian, A., 1967. Attitudes inferred from nonimmediacy of verbal communication. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6: 294-295.
21. Moore, A., Masterson, J. T., Christophel, D. M., and Shea, K. A., 1996. College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45: 29-39.
22. Pearson, J., 1990. “ Large lecture classes ”. In Teaching communication: Theory, research & methods, Edited by: Daly, J. A., Frederich, G. W., and Vangelisri, A. L., 293-300. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Penner, J., 1984. Why many college teachers cannot lecture: How to avoid communication breakdown in the classroom, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
24. Powell, R. G., and Harville, B., 1990. The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment. Communication Education, 39: 369-379.
25. Sanders, J. A., and Wiseman, R. L., 1990. The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39: 341-353.
26. Schon, D. A., 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, New York: Basic Books.