Authenticity in assessment: Reflecting undergraduate study and professional practice

European Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 193-202

  Palmer, Stuart ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

ASSESSMENT PRACTICES; ASSESSMENT TASKS; ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES; UNDERGRADUATE COURSES; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING COURSE; UNDERGRADUATE STUDY;

STUDENTS;

EID: 70349818297     PISSN: 03043797     EISSN: 14695898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03043790310001633179     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Bates I, Lloyd BE, Martinelli F, Stradling J, Vines JA, 1992 Skills for the Future—Engineers and Scientists Achieving Enterprise Performance Melbourne The Association of Professional Engineers and Scientists, Australia
2. Berglund, A, Daniels, M, Hedenborg, M, and Tengstrand, A. 1998. Assessment to increase students' creativity: two case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23: 45–54.
3. Burtner J, 2000 The changing role of assessment in engineering education: a review of the literature ASEE 2000 Southeast Section Conference, 2–4 April Roanoke VA
4. Engineering Professors' Council 2000 The EPC engineering graduate output standard The Engineering Professors' Council Coventry England EPC Occasional Paper Number 10
5. Institution of Engineers Australia 1999 Manual for the Accreditation of Professional Engineering Programs Canberra IEAust
6. James R, McInnis C, Devlin M, 2002 Assessing Learning in Australian Universities Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The Australian Universities Teaching Committee
7. Johnson P, 1996 Changing the Culture: Engineering Education into the Future Barton, Australian Capital Territory IEAust
8. Knight P, 2001 Implications for the assessment of engineering degree students of the adoption of engineering output standards SEFI Annual Conference 2001 Copenhagen Société Européenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs 12–14 September
9. Lundström, TS, and Booth, SA. 2002. Journals based on applications: an attempt to improve students' learning about composite materials. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27: 195–208.
10. Peterson GD, 1998 A bold new change agent In ASEE (ed.) How do you Measure Success? Designing Effective Processes for Assessing Engineering Education Washington, DC American Society for Engineering Education pp. 5–10
11. Ramsay A, 2002 The economics and organisation of UK-based accreditation of engineering degree programmes 2002 ASEE/SEFI/TUB International Colloquium, American Society for Engineering Education, 1–4 October Berlin
12. Rompelman, O. 2000. Assessment of student learning: evolution of objectives in engineering education and the consequences for assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25: 339–350.
13. Schachterle, L. 1999. Outcomes assessment and accreditation in US engineering formation. European Journal of Engineering Education, 24: 121–131.
14. Schön DA, 1995 The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action Aldershot Arena
15. Vos, H. 2000. How to assess for improvement of learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25: 227–233.
16. Williams B, 1988 Review of the Discipline of Engineering—Volume 1 Report and Recommendations Canberra Commonwealth Tertiary Education Service