High-resolution images with minimum energy dissipation and maximum field-of-view in camera-based wireless multimedia sensor networks

Sensors

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 6385-6410

  Aghdasi, Hadi S ^a   Bisadi, Pouya ^a   Moghaddam, Mohsen Ebrahimi ^a   Abbaspour, Maghsoud ^a  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Camera selection problem; Camera based sensor networks; High resolution and wide images; Image stitching; Minimum wasted energy; Two tier network topology

Indexed keywords

CAMERA SELECTION; CAMERA-BASED; HIGH RESOLUTION; IMAGE STITCHING; MINIMUM WASTED ENERGY; TWO-TIER NETWORKS;

ALGORITHMS; COSTS; ELECTRIC NETWORK TOPOLOGY; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; SENSOR NETWORKS; SENSOR NODES;

CAMERAS;

EID: 70349816729     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s90806385     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Gürses, E.; Akan, Ö.B. Multimedia communication in wireless sensor networks. Ann. Télécommun. 2005, 60, 872-900.
2. Akyildiz, I.F.; Melodia, T.; Chowdhury, K.R. A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Comput. Netw. 2007, 51, 921-960.
3. Maniezzo, D.; Yao, K.; Mazzini, G. Energetic trade-off between communication and computation resource in Multimedia Surveillance Sensor Network. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Communications Network, Paris, France, 2002; pp. 373-376.
4. Hu, F.; Kumar, S. Multimedia query with QoS considerations for wireless sensor networks in telemedicine. In Proceedings of International Conference on Internet Multimedia Management Systems (SPIE ITCom '03), Orlando, FL, USA, 2003.
5. Reeves, A.A. Remote Monitoring of patients suffering from early symptoms of Dementia. In International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, London, UK, April 2005.
6. Campbell, J.; Gibbons, P.B.; Nath, S.; Pillai, P.; Seshan, S.; Sukthankar, R. IrisNet: an Internetscale architecture for multimedia sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, Hilton, Singapore, November 2005; pp. 81-88.
7. Tezcan, N.; Wang, W. Self-orienting Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks for maximizing multimedia coverage. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Beijing, China, May 2008; pp. 2206-2210.
8. Tezcan, N.; Wang, W. Self-orienting Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks for occlusion-free viewpoints. Comput. Netw. 2008, 52, 2558-2567.
9. Kansal, A.; Kaiser, W.; Pottie, G.; Srivastava, M. Virtual High-resolution for Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Boulder, CO, USA, November 2006; pp. 43-56.
10. Seetharaman, G.; Le, H.; Iyengar, S.; Balakrishnan, N.; Loganantharaj, R. A Multisensor Network Based Framework for Video Surveillance: Realtime Super-resolution Imaging. In Sensor Network Operations; Phoha, S., La Porta, T., Griffin, C., Eds.; Wiley-IEEE Press: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
11. Shechtman, E.; Caspi, Y.; Irani, M. Space-time super-resolution. IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 2005, 27, 531-545.
12. Akyildiz, I.F.; Melodia, T.; Chowdhury, K.R. Wireless multimedia sensor networks: applications and testbeds. Proc. IEEE 2008, 96, 1588-1605.
13. Soro, S.; Heinzelman, W.B. On the coverage problem in video-based wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of the IEEE Second Workshop on Broadband Advanced Sensor Networks (BaseNets'05), Boston, MA, USA, October 2005; pp. 932-939.
14. Balasubramanian, H.; Kumar Mitikiri, P.; Namuduri, K. Image Registration in low resolution visual sensor networks. IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, St. Louis, MO, USA, April 2008; pp. 551-552.
15. Kulkarni, p.; Ganesan, D.; Shenoy, P. The case for multi-tier camera sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, Stevenson, WA, USA, June 2005; pp. 141-146.
16. Polastre, J.; Szewczyk, R.; Sharp, C.; Culler, D. The mote revolution: low power wireless sensor network devices. In Proceedings of Hot Chips 16: A Symposium on High Performance Chips, Palo Alto, CA, USA, August 2004.
17. Rahimi, M.; Baer, R.; Iroezi, O.; Garcia, J.; Warrior, J.; Estrin, D.; Srivastava, M. Cyclops: In situ image sensing and interpretation in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. ACM Conf. Embed. Netw. Sensor Syst. (SenSys), San Diego, CA, USA, November 2005; pp. 192-204.
18. IMOTE2. Available at: http://www.xbow.com/Products/Imote2.aspx (accessed August 16, 2009).
19. Carnegie Mellon Univ. CMUcam3 datasheet version 1.02. Pittsburgh, PA, September 2007.
20. Hengstler, S.; Prashanth, D.; Fong, S.; Aghajan, H. MeshEye: A hybrid-resolution smart camera mote for applications in distributed intelligent surveillance. In Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Process. Sensor Netw. (IPSN), Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 360-369.
21. Feng, W.C.; Kaiser, E.; Feng, W.C.; Le Baillif, M. Panoptes: scalable low-power video sensor networking technologies. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 2005, 1, 151-167.
22. Stargate XScale Platform. Available at: http://blog.xbow.com/xblog/Stargate_Xscale_Platform/ (accessed August 16, 2009).
23. Kulkarni, P.; Ganesan, D.; Shenoy, P.; Lu, Q. SensEye: A multi-tier camera sensor Network. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, Singapore, November 2005; pp. 229-238.
24. Lymberopoulos, D.; Savvides, A. XYZ: A motion-enabled, power aware sensor node platform for distributed sensor network applications. In Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), Los Angeles, CA, USA, April 2005; pp. 449-454.
25. Low, C.P.; Fang, C.; Ng, J.M.; Ang, Y.H. Efficient load-balanced clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Commun. 2008, 31, 750-759.
26. Chang, R.S.; Kuo, C.J. An energy efficient routing mechanism for wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Washington, DC, USA, 2006; pp. 308-312.
27. Abbasi, A.; Younis, M. A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Commun. 2007, 30, 2826-2841.
28. Zhou, B.; Heng Ngoh, L.; Sung Lee B.; Peng Fu, C. HDA: A hierarchical data aggregation scheme for sensor networks. Elsevier Comput. Commun. 2006, 29, 1292-1299.
29. Cheng, H.B.; Yang, G.; Hu, S.J. NHRPA: A novel hierarchical routing protocol algorithm for wireless sensor networks. J. China Univer. Posts Telecommun. 2008, 15, 75-81.
30. Bari, A.; Jaekel, A.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Clustering strategies for improving the lifetime of two-tiered sensor networks. Comput. Commun. 2008, 31, 3451-3459.
31. Szeliski, R.; Kang, S. Direct methods for visual scene reconstruction. In IEEE Workshop on Representations of Visual Scenes, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995; pp. 26-33.
32. Irani, M.; Anandan, P. About direct methods. ICCV workshop on Vision Algorithms, Corfu, Greece, 1999; pp. 267-277.
33. Sawhney, H.; Kumar, R. True multi-image alignment and its application to mosaicing and lens distortion correction. IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 1999, 21, 235-243.
34. Shum, H.; Szeliski, R. Construction of panoramic mosaics with global and local alignment. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2000, 36, 101-130.
35. Capel, D.; Zisserman, A. Automated mosaicing with super-resolution zoom. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR98), Santa Barbara, CA, USA, June 1998; pp. 885-891.
36. McLauchlan, P.; Jaenicke, A. Image mosaicing using sequential bundle adjustment. Image Vision Comput. 2002, 20, 751-759.
37. Brown, M.; Lowe, D. Recognising panoramas. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV03), Nice, France, October 2003; pp. 1218-1225.
38. Brown, M.; Lowe, D. Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2007, 74, 59-73.
39. Lowe, D. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2004, 60, 91-110.
40. Realviz. Available at: http://www.realviz.com/ (accessed August 16, 2009).
41. Zitova, B.; Flusser, J. Image registration methods: A survey. Image Vision Comput. 2003, 21, 977-1000.
42. Brown, M.; Szeliski, R.; Winder, S. Multiimage matching using multi-scale oriented patches. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR05), San Diego, CA, USA, June 2005; pp. 510-517.
43. Sivic, J.; Zisserman, A. Video Google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV03), Nice, France, October 2003; pp. 1470-1477.
44. Fischler, M.; Bolles, R. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 1981, 24, 381-395.
45. Hartley, R.; Zisserman, A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004.
46. OMNeT++ Community Site. OMNeT++ Available at: http://www.omnetpp.org/ (accessed August 16, 2009).
47. Chipcon Corporation. CC2420 lowpower 2.4 GHz transceiver, 2006. Available online at: http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/cc2420.html (accessed August 16, 2009).
48. Corman, T.; Leiserson, C.; Rivest, R.; Stein, C. Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd ed.; MIT press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001.
49. Aghdasi, H.S.; Abbaspour, M.; Ebrahimi Moghadam, M.; Samei, Y. An energy-efficient and high-quality video transmission architecture in wireless video-based sensor networks. Sensors 2008, 8, 4529-4559.