India, Pakistan and cooperation along the Indus River system

Water Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-20

  Zawahri, Neda A ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Baglihar Dam; Cooperation over Indus River; Cooperation over international rivers; Design of river commissions; India and Pakistan relations; Indus River; Indus Waters Treaty; Permanent Indus Commission; Salal Dams

Indexed keywords

GAULTHERIA SHALLON;

EID: 70349816590     PISSN: 13667017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2009.010     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Akhlaque, Q. (2003). Indus water officials to meet on 28th. Dawn, 17 May 2003.
2. Alam, U. Z. (1998). Water Rationality: Mediating the Indus Waters Treaty. Dissertation, University of Durham, UK.
3. Alam, U. Z. (2002). Questioning the water wars rationale: a case study of the Indus Waters Treaty. Geographical Journal, 128(4), 341-353.
4. Ali, S. (1989). Indo-Pak river dispute becomes a domestic issue. Far Eastern Economic Review, 146(51).
5. Allan, T. (2002). The Middle East Water Question. I.B. Tauris Publishers, London, UK.
6. Amery, H. (2002). Water wars in the Middle East a looming threat. The Geographical Journal 168, 313-323.
7. Bernauer, T. (1995). The effect of international environmental institutions: how we might learn more. International Organization, 49(2), 351-377.
8. Bernauer, T. (1997). Managing international rivers. In Global Governance. Young, O. R. (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 155-193.
9. Biswas, A. K. (1992). Indus Waters Treaty: the negotiating process. Water International, 17(4), 201-209.
10. Biswas, A. K. (1999). Management of international waters: opportunities and constraints. Water Resources Development, 15(4), 429-441.
11. Chandra, P. (2001). Indus treaty may be abrogated? The Times of India, 26 December 2001.
12. Conca, K. (2006). Governing Water. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Conca, K., Wu, F. & Mei, C. (2006). Global regime formation or complex institution building? The principled content of international river agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 263-285.
14. Dellapenna, J. (1999). Custom-built solutions for international disputes. The UNESCO Courier, February, 33-36.
15. Dhillion, P. S. (1983). A Tale of Two Rivers. The Himalia Press, Chandigarh, India.
16. Dixit, J. N. (1998). Across Borders: Fifty Years of India's Foreign Policy. Picus Books, New Delhi.
17. Embassy of India Press Release (2007). Baglihar Dam cleared by neutral expert. New Delhi, India, 12 February. http://www.indianembassy.org/newsite/ press-release/2007/Feb/2.asp (accessed 1 April 2008).
18. Frey, F. W. (1993). The political context of conflict and cooperation over international river basins. Water International, 18, 54-68.
19. Furlong, K., Gleditsch, N. P. & Hegre, H. (2006). Geographic opportunity and neomalthusian willingness: boundaries, shared rivers, and conflict. International Interactions, 32, 79-108.
20. Giordano, M. F., Giordano, M. A. & Wolf, A. T. (2005). International resource conflict and mitigation. Journal of Peace Research, 42(1), 47-65.
21. Gleditsch, N. P., Furlong, K., Hegre, H., Lacina, B. & Owen, T. (2006). Conflict over shared rivers: resource scarcity or fuzzy boundaries? Political Geography, 25, 361-382.
22. Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. International Security, 18(1), 79-112.
23. Government of India (1965-66). Annual Report of India's Ministry of External Affairs, 18-22.
24. Government of India (1975-76). Annual Report of India's Ministry of External Affairs, 18-21.
25. Government of India (1992-93). Annual Report of India's Ministry of External Affairs, 20-24.
26. Government of India Press Release (2008). Ministry ofWater Resources. January 2. http://www.pib.nic.in/release/rel-print-page1.asp?relid=34342 (last accessed April 1, 2008).
27. Grover, V. & Arora, R. (eds) (1999). Events and Documents of Indo-Pak Relations. Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi, India. pp. 522-524.
28. Gulhati, N. (1973). Indus Waters Treaty: An Exercise in International Mediation. Allied Publishers, Bombay, India.
29. Hensel, P., Mitchell McLaughlin, S. & Sowers, T. (2006). Conflict management of riparian disputes. Political Geography, 25, 283-411.
30. The Hindu (1982). Jammu-Kashmir main beneficiary under amended Indus Waters Treaty. The Hindu, 23 June 1982.
31. The Hindu (1987). Wular barrage not to be shelved. The Hindu, 28 October 1987.
32. The Hindu (2003). Cleaning the Indus. The Hindu, 10 July 2003.
33. Hirsch, A. M. (1956). From the Indus to the Jordan: characteristics of Middle East international river disputes. Political Science Quarterly, 71(2), 203-322.
34. Indus Waters Treaty (1960). Signed in Karachi, Pakistan, 19 September. 419 UNTS 126.
35. Iyer, R. R. (1999). Conflict-resolution: three river treaties. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(24), 1509-1518.
36. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
37. Keohane, R. O. (1993). The analysis of international institutions. In Institution Theory and International Relations. Rittberger, V. (ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 23-45.
38. Keohane, R. O. & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security, 20(1), 39-51.
39. Keohane, R. O. & Martin, L. L. (2003). Institutional theory as a research program. In Progress in International Relations Theory. Elman, C. & Fendius Elman, M. (eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 71-107.
40. Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence. Little, Brown & Company, Boston, MA.
41. Kliot, N., Shamueli, D. & Shamir, U. (2001). Institutions for management of transboundary water resources: their nature, characteristics and shortcomings. Water Policy, 3, 229-255.
42. Koremenos, B., Lipson, C. & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761-799.
43. Lafitte, R. (2007). Baglihar Hydroelectric Plant, Expert Determination on Point of Difference Referred by the Government of Pakistan under the Provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty, Executive Summary, Lausanne, Switzerland.
44. LeMarquand, D. G. (1977). International Rivers: The Politics of Cooperation. Wastewater Research Center, University of British Columbia, Canada.
45. Lipschutz, R. & Holdren, J. (1991). Crossing borders: resource flows, the global environment and international security. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 21, 121-133.
46. Lok Sabha (1964). Indus Commission. Government of India, 9 April 1964, 10058-10060.
47. Lok Sabha (1965). Indus Waters Commission. Government of India, 25 November 1965, 3776-3777.
48. Lok Sabha (1978). Agreement re Design of Salal Hydro-electric Plant. Government of India, 14 April 1978, 255-262.
49. Lok Sabha (1988). Pak's Earthen Dam on Ravi. Government of India, 12 August 1988, 197-198.
50. Lowi, M. (1993). Water and Power: The Politics of a Scarce Resource in the Jordan River Basin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
51. Mandel, R. (1992). Sources of international river basin disputes. Conflict Quarterly, 12(4), 25-56.
52. Marty, F. (2001). Managing International Rivers. Peter Lang, Berlin.
53. Mehta, J. S. (1988). The Indus Waters Treaty: a case study in the resolution of an international river basin conflict. Natural Resources Forum, 12(1), 69-77.
54. McCaffrey, S. (2002). Water disputes defined: Characteristics and trends for resolving them. In: Resolution of International Water Disputes. The International Bureau of the Permanent court of Arbitration (Ed.), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 49-90.
55. Michel, A. (1967). The Indus Rivers. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
56. Mitchell, R. (1994). Regime design matters: international oil pollution and treaty compliance. International Organization, 48(3), 425-458.
57. Nakayama, M. (2003). Institutional aspects of international water-system management. In International Waters In Southern Africa. Nakayama, M. (Ed.). UN University Press, Tokyo, pp 101-113.
58. Naseer, K. (2005). Baglihar dam issue: Pakistan to present case before neutral experts in August. Daily Times, 31 July 2005.
59. Nasrullah, M. (1994). Wular barrage. Pakistan Horizon, 47(1), 47-66.
60. National Hydro-electric Power Corporation (1999). Hydro scene of Jammu and Kashmir. National Hydro-electric Power Corporation, Faridabad, India.
61. Noorani, A. G. (1994). Easing the Indo-Pakistani Dialogue on Kashmir, Occasional Paper 16. The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC.
62. Noshab, F. & Mushtaq, N. (2001). Water disputes in South Asia. Institute of Strategic Studies, 51, 21-32.
63. Pak Tribune (2007). World Bank validates Pakistan stand on Baglihar Dam. Pak Tribune, 12 February 2007.
64. Parsai, G. (2005). Neutral expert to visit Baglihar dam site in J&K. The Hindu, 30 September 2007.
65. Parsai, G. (2007). Baglihar dam: India claims moral victory. The Hindu, 13 February 2007.
66. PIC Annual Report (1965). Signed in Karachi, Pakistan, 31 May.
67. PIC Annual Report (1966). Signed in Karachi, Pakistan, 17 May.
68. PIC Annual Report (1971). Signed in New Delhi, India, 17 May.
69. PIC Annual Report (1972). Signed in Karachi, Pakistan, 31 May.
70. PIC Annual Report (1973). Signed in New Delhi, India, 30 May.
71. PIC Annual Report (1974). Signed in Islamabad, Pakistan, 29 May.
72. Priscoli, J. D. (1996). Conflict Resolution, Collaboration and Management in International Water Resource Issues, Working Paper no. 6. US Army Corps of Engineers.
73. Priscoli, J. D. (1998). Water and civilization: using history to reframe water policy debates and to build a new ecological realism. Water Policy, 1, 623-636.
74. Priscoli, J. D. (2005). Five challenges for water governance. Introductory address at the International Ecosystem Symposium on Ecosystem Governance. Pilansberg, South Africa, October, 2005.
75. Priscoli, J. D. & Llamas, M. R. (2001). International perspective on ethical dilemmas in the water industry. In Navigating Rough Waters Ethical Issues in the Water Industry. Davis, C. & McGinn, R. (eds). American Water Works Association, Denver, CO, pp. 41-64.
76. Puchala, D. J. & Hopkins, R. F. (1982). International institutions: lessons from inductive analysis. International Organization, 36(2), 245-275.
77. Rahim, A. (1990). Indus basin development. In United Nations Department of Technical Cooperation, Natural Water Resources Series No. 20, River and Lake Basin Development, Proceedings of the UN Meeting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
78. Reddy, G. K. (1976). Salal: differences being narrowed down. Times of India, 6 October 1976.
79. Salman, S. M. A. (2003). Good offices and mediation and international water disputes. In Resolution of International Water Disputes. The International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (Ed.). Kluwer Law International, The Hague, The Netherlands. pp 155-200.
80. Salman, S. M. A. (2008). The Baglihar difference and its resolution process-a triumph for the Indus Waters Treaty. Water Policy, 10, 105-117.
81. Salman, S. M. A. & Uprety, K. (2002). Conflict and Cooperation on South Asia's International Rivers. World Bank, Washington, DC.
82. Sharma, K. S. (1990). India's experience in developing the Indus River basin program. In United Nations Department of Technical Cooperation, Natural Water Resources Series, No. 20, River and Lake Basin Development, Proceedings of the UN Meeting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
83. Srinath, M. G. (1986). India denies Pak charge on Jhelum. Hindustan Times, 27 September 1986.
84. Stein, A. A. (1990). Why Nations Cooperate. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
85. Swain, A. (2002). Environmental cooperation in South Asia. In Environmental Peacemaking. Conca, K. & Dabelko, G. D. (eds). Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC, pp. 61-85.
86. Swain, A. (2004). Managing Water Conflict. Routledge, London.
87. Toset, H. P. W., Gleditsch, N. P. & Hegre, H. (2000). Shared rivers and interstate conflict. Political Geography, 19, 971-996.
88. Verghese, B. G. (1997). Water conflict in South Asia. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 20, 185-194.
89. Verghese, B. G. (2002). Talk of abrogating Indus Waters Treaty. The Tribune, 29 April 2002.
90. Waterbury, J. (1997). Between unilateralism and comprehensive accords: modest steps towards cooperation in international river basins. Water Resources Development, 13(3), 279-289.
91. White, G. F. (1998). Reflections on the 50-year international search for integrated water management. Water Policy, 1, 21-27.
92. Wirsing, R. & Jasparro, C. (2007). River rivalry: water disputes, resource insecurity, and diplomatic deadlock in South Asia. Water Policy, 9, 231-251.
93. Wolf, A. T. (1995). Hydropolitics Along the Jordan River. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
94. Wolf, A. T. (1998). Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy, 1, 251-265.
95. Yoffe, S., Wolf, A. T. & Giordano, M. (2003). Conflict and cooperation over international freshwater resources: indicators of basins at risk. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 10, 1109-1126.
96. Young, O. R. (1999). Governance in World Affairs. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
97. Zawahri, N. A. (2006). Stabilizing Iraq's water supply: what the Euphrates and Tigris rivers can learn from the Indus. Third World Quarterly, 27(6), 1041-1058.
98. Zawahri, N. A. (2008a). Capturing the nature of cooperation, unstable cooperation, and conflict over international rivers: The story of the Indus, Yarmouk, Euphrates, and Tigris Rivers. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 8(3), 286-310.
99. Zawahri, N. A. (2008b). Internationl rivers and national security: The Euphrates, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Indus, Tigris, and Yarmouk Rivers. Natural Resources Forum, 32, 280-289.
100. Zawahri, N. A. (Forthcoming). Mediating International River Disputes: lessons from the Indus River. International Negotiation, in press.