End-to-end features as meta-entities for enabling coordination in geographically distributed software development

Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Development Governance, SDG 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 21-26

  Cataldo, Marcelo ^a   Herbsleb, James D ^b  

^a ROBERT BOSCH GMBH   (Germany)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE TOOLS; DISTRIBUTED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DISTRIBUTED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; INTER-RELATIONSHIPS; ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGNS; PRODUCT FEATURE; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; WORK ACTIVITIES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 70349811620     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SDG.2009.5071332     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Argyres, N.S. The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination: Evidence from the B-2 "Stealth" Bomber. Organization Science, 10, 2 (1999), pp. 162-180.
2. Asuncion, H.U., et al. An End-to-End Industrial Software Traceability Tool. In Proceedings of Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE'07), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2007.
3. Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press. 2000.
4. Bass, M. et al. Architectural Misalignment: An Experience Report. In Proceedings of the Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'07), Mumbai, India, 2007.
5. Berenbach, B. and Wolf, T. A Unified Requirement Model: Integrating Features, Use Cases, Requirements, Requirement Analysis and Hazard Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference in Global Software Engineering (ICGSE'07), Munich, Germany, 2007.
6. Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 2 (1995).
7. Browning, T.R. Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 40, 3 (2001), pp. 292-306.
8. Bruegge, B. et al. Sysiphus: Enabling Informal Collaboration in Global Software Development. In Proceedings of the International Conference in Global Software Engineering. (ICGSE'06), Florianopolis, Brazil, 2006.
9. Cataldo, M. et al. (2006). Identification of Coordination Requirements: Implications for the Design of Collaboration and Awareness Tools. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'06), Banff, Alberta, Canada.
10. Cheng, L. et al. (2003). Jazzing up Eclipse with Collaborative Tools. In Proceedings of 2003 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology Exchange, New York, NY.
11. Conway, M.E. How do committees invent? Datamation, 14, 5 (1968), 28-31.
12. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), pp. 554-571.
13. de Souza, C.R.B et al. How a Good Software Practice Thwarts Collaboration - The multiple roles of APIs in Software Development. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE'04), Newport Beach, CA, 2004.
14. Eppinger, S.D. et al. A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development. Research in Engineering Design, 6 (1994), pp. 1-13.
15. Faraj, S. and Xiao, Y. Coordination in Fast-Response Organization. Management Science, 52, 8 (2006), pp. 1155-1169.
16. Galbraith, J.R. Designing Complex Organizations. Ad-dison-Wesley Publishing, 1973.
17. Gong, L. et al. Integrated Solution Engineering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOP-SLA'06), Portland, OR, 2006.
18. Gotel, O.C.Z and Finkelstein, A.C.W. An Analysis of the Requirement Traceability Problem. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE'94), 1994.
19. Griss, M. Implementing Product-Line Features by Composing Component Aspects. In Proceedings of the International Software Product Line Conference, Denver, CO, 2000.
20. Herbsleb, J.D. and Mockus, A. An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally Distributed Software Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29, 6 (2003).
21. Jazz Project. http://jazz.net/pub/index.jsp. URL accessed on September 11th, 2008.
22. Karolak, D.W. Global Software Development: Managing Virtual Teams and Environments, IEEE Computer Society, 1998.
23. March, J.G and Simon, H.A. Organizations. Wiley, 1958.
24. McDonough, E.F. et al. An Investigation of Global, Virtual and Collocated New Product Development Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (2001), 110-120.
25. Sarma, A. A Survey of Collaborative Tools in Software Development. ISR Technical Report #UCI-ISR-05-3, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 2005.
26. Simon, H.A. The Architecture of Complexity. In Proc. of the American Philosophical Societ y, 106, 6 (1962), pp. 467-482.
27. Sosa, M.E. et al. The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development. Management Science, 50, 12 (2004), pp. 1674-1689.
28. Sosa, M. E. A Structure Approach to Predicting and Managing Technical Interaction in Software Development. Research in Engineering Design, 19 (2008), pp. 47-70.
29. Staudenmayer, N. Managing Multiple Interdependen-cies in Large Scale Software Development Projects. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997
30. Thompson, J.D. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, 1967.
31. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. Product Design and Development, 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill, 2008.
32. von Hippel, E. Task Partitioning: An Innovation Process Variable. Research Policy, 19 (1990), pp. 407-418.