The UK FIM+FAM Extended Activities of Daily Living module: Evaluation of scoring accuracy and reliability

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 825-830

  Law, Janet ^a,b   Fielding, Beverley ^a   Jackson, Diana ^b   Turner Stokes, Lynne ^a,b  

^a NORTHWICK PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Extended activities of daily living; Outcome measures; Psychometric evaluation; Rehabilitation; Reliability; Vignettes

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; EXTENDED ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING MODULE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED KINGDOM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT MEASURE; VIGNETTE; CONVALESCENCE; HOSPITALIZATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BRAIN INJURIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 70349767370     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280802355049     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Turner-Stokes L. Standardized outcome assessment in brain injury rehabilitation for younger adults. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:383-389.
2. Sackley CM, Gladman JRF. The evidence for rehabilitation after severely disabling stroke. Phys Ther Rev 1998;3:19-29.
3. Skinner A, Turner-Stokes L. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:609-615.
4. Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T, Gatehouse C. The UK FIM+FAM: development and evaluation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:277-287.
5. Hall KM, Hamilton BB, Gordon WA, Zasler ND. Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Functional Assessment Measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:60-74.
6. Pentland B, Hellawell DJ, Benjamin J. The Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM) as part of the hospital discharge summary after brain injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:498-502.
7. Powell J, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:193-202.
8. Seel RT, Wright G, Wallace T, Newman S, Dennis L. The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007;22: 267-277.
9. Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, Langdon DW, McLellan DL, Greenwood RJ, Thompson AJ. Evidencebased measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology. 2001;57:639-644.
10. Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, Pentland B. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:749-754.
11. Hall KM, Johnson MV. Outcomes evaluation in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Part Measurement tools for a nationwide data system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:SC- 10-SC-18.
12. Goverover Y. Categorization, deductive reasoning, and selfawareness: association with everyday competence in persons with acute brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004;26: 737-749.
13. Zorowitz RD, Gross E, Polinski DM. The stroke survivor. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:666-679.
14. Streiner D, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
15. Stata Corp. Stata statistical software, release 8.0th ed. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2003.
16. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 2003