Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user-product interactions

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 34-40

  Fenko, Anna ^a   Schifferstein, Hendrik N J ^a   Hekkert, Paul ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Product design; Sensory dominance; User product interaction

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER PRODUCTS;

DIFFERENT STAGES; FIRST YEAR; LONG LASTING; PRODUCT EXPERIENCE; PRODUCT INTERACTION; SENSORY DOMINANCE; SENSORY MODALITY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; SENSORY SYSTEM; SMELLING; TASTE; TOUCH; VISION;

EID: 70349766980     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bertelson P. Ventriloquism: a case of cross-modal perceptual grouping. In: Aschersleben G., Bachmann T., and Müsseler J. (Eds). Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events (1999), Elsevier, Amsterdam 347-362
2. Brannen J. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: an Overview, Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research (1992), Avebury, Aldershot pp. 3-37
3. Classen C. McLuhan in the rainforest. In: Howes D. (Ed). Empire of the Senses (2005), Berg, Oxford, New York 147-163
4. Easton R., and Moran P.W. A quantitative confirmation of visual capture of curvature. J. Genet. Psychol. 98 (1978) 105-112
5. Fenko A., Schifferstein H.N.J., Huang T.C., and Hekkert P. What makes products fresh: the smell or the colour?. Food Qual. Prefer. 20 (2009) 372-379
6. Harte J.M., and Koele P. A comparison of different methods for the elicitation of attribute weights: structural modeling, process tracing, and self-reports. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 64 (1995) 75-117
7. Hay J.C., Pick H.L., and Ikeda K. Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychon. Sci. 2 (1965) 215-216
8. Herz R.S. An examination of objective and subjective measures of experience associated to odors, music, and paintings. Empir. Stud. Arts 16 2 (1998) 137-152
9. Hinton P.B., and Henley T.B. Cognitive and affective components of stimuli presented in three modes. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 31 (1993) 595-598
10. Jaccard J., Brinberg D., and Ackerman L.J. Assessing attribute importance: a comparison of six methods. J. Consum. Res. 12 (1986) 463-468
11. Karapanos E., Hassenzahl M., and Martens J.B. User Experience Over Time. CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2008), ACM, Florence, Italy
12. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: an Introduction to Its Methodology (1980), Sage, London
13. Labovitz S. The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35 (1970) 5151-5524
14. Lederman S.J., Thorne G., and Jones B. Perception of texture by vision and touch: multidimensionality and intersensory integration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 12 (1986) 169-180
15. McLuhan M. Inside the five sense sensorium. The Can Archit 6 June (1961) 49-54
16. Meyers L.S., Guarino A., and Gamst G. Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation (2005), Sage Publications
17. Miller E.A. Interaction of vision and touch in conflict and nonconflict form perception tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. 96 (1972) 114-123
18. Mugge R., Schifferstein H.N.J., and Schoormans J.P.L. Personalizing product appearance: the effect on product attachment. In: Kurtgözü A. (Ed). Fourth International Conference on Design and Emotion, Ankara, Turkey (2004)
19. Rock I., and Victor J. Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143 (1964) 594-596
20. Schifferstein H.N.J., and Desmet P.M.A. The effect of sensory impairments on product experience and personal well-being. Ergonomics 50 (2007) 2026-2048
21. Schifferstein H.N.J. The relative importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. Acta Psychol. 121 (2006) 41-64
22. Schifferstein H.N.J., and Cleiren M.P.H.D. Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. Acta Psychol. 118 (2005) 293-318
23. Schifferstein H.N.J., and Zwartkruis-Pelgrim E.P.H. Consumer-product attachment: measurement and design implications. Int J Des 2 (2008) 1-13
24. Shapiro K.L., Egerman B., and Klein R.M. Effects of arousal on human visual dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 35 (1984) 547-552
25. Singer G., and Day R.N. Visual capture of haptually judged depth. Percept. Psychophys. 6 (1969) 203-205
26. Stratton G.M. Vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychol. Rev. 4 (1897) 341-369 463-481
27. Teghtsoonian R., and Teghtsoonian M. Two varieties of perceived length. Percept. Psychophys. 8 (1970) 389-392
28. Van Dijk T.A., and Kintsch W. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension (1983), Academic Press, New York
29. Van Ittersum K., Pennings J.M.E., Wansink B., and van Trijp H.C.M. The validity of attribute-importance measurement: a review. J. Bus. Res. 60 (2007) 1177-1190