Sensitivity to delay of reinforcement in two animal models of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 372-376

  Sutherland, Karen R ^a   Alsop, Brent ^a   McNaughton, Neil ^a   Hyland, Brian I ^a   Tripp, Gail ^a,b   Wickens, Jeffery R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b OKINAWA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Animal model; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Delay of reinforcement; Genetically hypertensive rat

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; GENETICALLY HYPERTENSIVE RAT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; RESPONSE TIME; SPONTANEOUSLY HYPERTENSIVE RAT; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WISTAR KYOTO RAT; WISTAR RAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RATS; RATS, INBRED SHR; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; RATS, INBRED WKY; RATS, WISTAR; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70349758114     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alsop B. Problems with spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) as a model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD). J Neurosci Methods 162 (2007) 42-48
2. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. 1994, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
3. Bizot J.C., Chenault N., Houze B., Herpin A., David S., Pothion S., et al. Methylphenidate reduces impulsive behaviour in juvenile Wistar rats, but not in adult Wistar, SHR and WKY rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 193 (2007) 215-223
4. Bull E., Reavill C., Hagan J.J., Overend P., and Jones D.N.C. Evaluation of the spontaneously hypertensive rat as a model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: acquisition and performance of the DRL-60s test. Behav Brain Res 109 (2000) 27-35
5. DasBanerjee T., Middleton F.A., Berger D.F., Lombardo J.P., Sagvolden T., and Faraone S.V. A comparison of molecular alterations in environmental and genetic rat models of ADHD: a pilot study. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147B (2008) 1554-1563
6. Dwinell M.R., Worthey E.A., Shimoyama M., Bakir-Gungor B., DePons J., Laulederkind S., et al. The Rat Genome Database 2009: variation, ontologies and pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (2009) D744-D749
7. Fox A.T., Hand D.J., and Reilly M.P. Impulsive choice in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behav Brain Res 187 (2008) 146-152
8. Johansen E.B., Sagvolden T., and Kvande G. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Behav Brain Res 162 (2005) 47-61
9. Johnson M.L., Ely D.L., and Turner M.E. Genetic divergence between the Wistar-Kyoto rat and the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension 19 (1992) 425-427
10. Kantak K.M., Singh T., Kerstetter K.A., Dembro K.A., Mutebi M.M., Harvey R.C., et al. Advancing the spontaneous hypertensive rat model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behav Neurosci 122 (2008) 340-357
11. Kurtz T.W., Montano M., Chan L., and Kabra P. Molecular evidence of genetic heterogeneity in Wistar-Kyoto rats: implications for research with the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension 13 (1989) 188-192
12. Luman M., Oosterlaan J., and Sergeant J.A. The impact of reinforcement contingencies on AD/HD: a review and theoretical appraisal. Clin Psychol Rev 25 (2005) 183-213
13. Malkesman O., and Weller A. Two different putative genetic animal models of childhood depression-a review. Prog Neurobiol 88 (2009) 153-169
14. McCarty R., and Kopin I.J. Patterns of behavioral development in spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar-Kyoto normotensive controls. Dev Psychobiol 12 (1979) 239-243
15. Nabika T., Nara Y., Ikeda K., Endo J., and Yamori Y. Genetic heterogeneity of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension 18 (1991) 12-16
16. Okamoto K., and Aoki K. Development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Jpn Circ J 27 (1963) 282-293
17. Pardon M.C., Gould G.G., Garcia A., Phillips L., Cook M.C., Miller S.A., et al. Stress reactivity of the brain noradrenergic system in three rat strains differing in their neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to stress: implications for susceptibility to stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuroscience 115 (2002) 229-242
18. Phelan E.L. The New Zealand strain of rats with genetic hypertension. NZ Med J 67 (1968) 334-344
19. Sagvolden T. Behavioral validation of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) as an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD). Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24 (2000) 31-39
20. Sagvolden T., Hendley E.D., and Knardahl S. Behavior of hypertensive and hyperactive rat strains: hyperactivity is not unitarily determined. Physiol Behav 52 (1992) 49-57
21. Sagvolden T., Pettersen M.B., and Larsen M.C. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) as a putative animal model of childhood hyperkinesis: SHR behavior compared to four other rat strains. Physiol Behav 54 (1993) 1047-1055
22. Sagvolden T., Aase H., Zeiner P., and Berger D. Altered reinforcement mechanisms in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behav Brain Res 94 (1998) 61-71
23. Sagvolden T., Johansen E.B., Aase H., and Russell V.A. A dynamic developmental theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive and combined subtypes. Behav Brain Sci 28 (2005) 397-419
24. Sagvolden T., Russell V.A., Aase H., Johansen E.B., and Farshbaf M. Rodent models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 57 (2005) 1239-1247
25. Sagvolden T., Metzger M.A., Schiorbeck H.K., Rugland A.L., Spinnangr I., and Sagvolden G. The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) as an animal model of childhood hyperactivity (ADHD): changed reactivity to reinforcers and to psychomotor stimulants. Behav Neural Biol 58 (1992) 103-112
26. Schaefer C.F. Regarding open-field behavior of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Behav Neural Biol 29 (1980) 537-538
27. Smirk F.H., and Hall W.H. Inherited hypertension in rats. Nature 182 (1958) 727-728
28. Snedecor G.W., and Cochran W.G. Statistical methods. 6th ed. (1967), Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa
29. Solanto M.V., Abikoff H., Sonuga-Barke E., Schachar R., Logan G.D., Wigal T., et al. The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivitiy in AD/HD: a supplement to the NIMH multimodal treatment study of AD/HD. J Abnormal Child Psychol 29 (2001) 215-228
30. Sonuga-Barke E.J. The dual pathway model of AD/HD: an elaboration of neuro-developmental characteristics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27 (2003) 593-604
31. Sonuga-Barke E.J., Taylor E., Sembi S., and Smith J. Hyperactivity and delay aversion-I. The effect of delay on choice. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 33 (1992) 387-398
32. St Lezin E., Simonet L., Pravenec M., and Kurtz T.W. Hypertensive strains and normotensive 'control' strains. How closely are they related?. Hypertension 19 (1992) 419-424
33. Tripp G., and Alsop B. Sensitivity to reward delay in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). J Child Psychol Psychiatr 42 (2001) 691-698
34. Tripp G., and Wickens J.R. Research review: dopamine transfer deficit: a neurobiological theory of altered reinforcement mechanisms in ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49 (2008) 691-704
35. Twigger S.N., Shimoyama M., Bromberg S., Kwitek A.E., and Jacob H.J. The Rat Genome Database, update 2007-easing the path from disease to data and back again. Nucleic Acids Res 35 (2007) D658-D662
36. van den Bergh F.S., Bloemarts E., Chan J.S., Groenink L., Olivier B., and Oosting R.S. Spontaneously hypertensive rats do not predict symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 83 (2006) 380-390
37. Wickens J.R., Macfarlane J., Booker C., and McNaughton N. Dissociation of hypertension and fixed interval responding in two separate strains of genetically hypertensive rat. Behav Brain Res 152 (2004) 393-401