Nobody is Perfect: ATR’s Hybrid Approach to Spoken Language Translation

2005 International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, IWSLT 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 45-52

  Paul, Michael ^a   Doi, Takao ^a   Hwang, Youngsook ^a   Imamura, Kenji ^a   Okuma, Hideo ^a   Sumita, Eiichiro ^a  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CONDITION; CORPUS-BASED; CURRENT SYSTEM; EVALUATION RESULTS; HYBRID APPROACH; MULTIPLE CORPORA; SPOKEN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; STATISTIC MODELING; TRAINING DATA; TRANSLATION ENGINES;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 70349754143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. M. Nagao, “A framework of a mechanical translation between japanese and english by analogy principle,” in Proc. of the International NATO Symposium on Artificial and Human Intelligence. North Holland: Elsevier, 1984, pp. 173–180.
2. P. Brown, S. D. Pietra, V. D. Pietra, and R. Mercer, “A statistical approach to machine translation,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 16(2), pp. 79–85, 1990.
3. T. Watanabe and E. Sumita, “Example-based decoding for statistical machine translation,” in Proc. of MT Summit IX, New Orleans, USA, 2003, pp. 410–417.
4. C. Manning and H. Schütze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1999.
5. U. Germann, M. Jahr, K. Knight, D. Marcu, and K. Yamada, “Fast decoding and optimal decoding for machine translation,” in Proc. of ACL, Toulouse, France, 2001.
6. E. Sumita, Y. Akiba, T. Doi, A. Finch, K. Imamura, H. Okuma, M. Paul, M. Shimohata, and T. Watanabe, “EBMT, SMT, Hybrid and More: ATR Spoken Language Translation System,” in Proc. of International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, Kyoto, Japan, 2004, pp. 13–20.
7. H. N. Nicola Ueffing, Franz Josef Och, “Generation of word graphs in statistical machine translation,” in Proc. of EMNLP, Philadelphia, USA, 2002, pp. 156–163.
8. Y. Hwang, H. Chung, and H. Rim, “Weighted probabilistic sum model based on decision tree decomposition for text chunking,” IJCPOL, vol. 16(1), pp. 1–20, 2003.
9. K. Imamura, H. Okuma, and E. Sumita, “Practical approach to syntax-based statistical machine translation,” in Proc. of Machine Translation Summit X, Phuket, Thailand, 2005, p. (to appear).
10. K. Imamura, H. Okuma, T. Watanabe, and E. Sumita, “Example-based machine translation based on syntactic transfer with statistical models,” in Proc. of COLING, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004, pp. 99–105.
11. K. Imamura, “Application of translation knowledge acquired by hierarchical phrase alignment for pattern-based MT,” in Proc. of TMI, Keihanna, Japan, 2002, pp. 74–84.
12. K. Imamura, E. Sumita, and Y. Matsumoto, “Feedback cleaning of machine translation rules using automatic evaluation,” in Proc. of ACL, Sapporo, Japan, 2003, pp. 447–454.
13. E. Sumita, “Example-based machine translation using DP-matching between word sequences,” in Proc. of ACL, Workshop: Data-Driven Methods in Machine Translation, Toulouse, France, 2001, pp. 1–8.
14. E. Sumita and H. Iida, “Experiments and prospects of example-based machine translation,” in Proc. of ACL, 1991, pp. 185–192.
15. Y. Akiba, T. Watanabe, and E. Sumita, “Using language and translation models to select the best among outputs from multiple mt systems,” in Proc. of COLING, Taipei, Taiwan, 2002, pp. 8–14.
16. T. Mitchell, Machine Learning. New York, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 1997.
17. Y. Hochberg and A. Tamhane, Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York, USA: Wiley, 1987.
18. G. Kikui, E. Sumita, T. Takezawa, and S. Yamamoto, “Creating corpora for speech-to-speech translation,” in Proc. of EUROSPEECH03, Geneve, Switzerland, 2003, pp. 381–384.
19. S. Ohno and M. Hamanishi, Ruigo-Shin-Jiten. Kadokawa, 1984.