Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer on tissue sections

Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 442-450

  Peng, Yahui ^a   Jiang, Yulei ^a   Chuang, Shang Tian ^c   Yang, Ximing J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alpha methylacyl CoA racemase; Computer aided diagnosis; Immunohistochemistry; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EPITHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70349751842     PISSN: 15412016     EISSN: 15334058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31819e6d65     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71-96.
2. Epstein JI, Yang XJ. Prostate Biopsy Interpretation. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
3. Bostwick DG. Pathology of the Prostate. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
4. Wojno KJ, Epstein JI. The utility of basal cell-specific anticytokeratin antibody (34-beta-E12) in the diagnosis of prostatecancer: a review of 228 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:251-260.
5. Jiang Z, Woda BA, Rock KL, et al. P504S: a new molecular marker for the detection of prostate carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1397-1440. (Pubitemid 33022055)
6. Rubin MA, Zhou M, Dhanasekaran SM, et al. a-Methylacyl coenzyme A racemase as a tissue biomarker for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2002;287:1662-1670. (Pubitemid 34289218)
7. Adley BP, Yang XJ. Application of alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a review. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2006;28:1-13.
8. Ng VWL, Koh M, Tan SY, et al. Is triple immunostaining with HMWCK, p63, and Racemase in prostate cancer advantageous? A tissue microarray study. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;127:248-253. (Pubitemid 46797182)
9. Jiang Z, Li CZ, Fischer A, et al. Using an AMACR (P504S)/HMWCK/p63 cocktail for the detection of small foci prostate carcinoma in needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005; 123:231-236. (Pubitemid 40194084)
10. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, et al. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999;6:22-33. (Pubitemid 29061477)
11. Kobayashi T, Xu XW, MacMahon H, et al. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology. 1996;199:843-848. (Pubitemid 26157494)
12. Yoshida H, Dachman AH. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:26-41. (Pubitemid 40169505)
13. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology. 2001;220:781-786.
14. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1399-1409. (Pubitemid 46556325)
15. Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE. Computer-aided screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:84.
16. Feig SA, Birdwell RL, Linver MN. Computer-aided screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:84.
17. Gromet M. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:854-859. (Pubitemid 351571504)
18. Thompson D, Bartels PH, Bartels HG, et al. Image segmentation of cribriform gland tissue. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1995;17: 314-322.
19. Bartels PH, Thompson D, Bartels HG, et al. Machine vision-based histometry of premalignant and malignant prostatic lesions. Pathol Res Pract. 1995;191:935-944.
20. Diamond J, Anderson NH, Bartels PH, et al. The use of morphological characteristics and texture analysis in the identification of tissue composition in prostatic neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:1121-1131. (Pubitemid 39165345)
21. Saidi O, Cordon-Cardo C, Costa J. Technology Insight: will systems pathology replace the pathologist?. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007;4:39-45.
22. Malacara D. Color Vision and Colorimetry: Theory and Applications. Washington: SPIE Press; 2002.
23. Soille P. Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2003.
24. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9:62-66. (Pubitemid 9413341)
25. Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1999.
26. Carswell BM, Woda BA, Wang X, et al. Detection of prostate cancer by alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) in needle biopsy specimens previously reported as negative for malignancy. Histopathology. 2006;48:668-673.
27. Shah RB, Kunju LP, Shen R, et al. Usefulness of basal cell cocktail (34betaE12+p63) in the diagnosis of atypical prostate glandular proliferations. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:517-523. (Pubitemid 39281247)
28. Zhou M, Shah R, Shen R, et al. Basal cell cocktail (34betaE12+p63) improves the detection of prostate basal cells. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:365-371. (Pubitemid 36245802)
29. Oliai BR, Kahane H, Epstein JI. Can basal cells be seen in adenocarcinoma of the prostate? An immunohistochemical study using high molecular weight cytokeratin (clone 34betaE12) antibody. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:1151-1160. (Pubitemid 34969184)
30. Osunkoya AO, Hansel DE, Sun X, et al. Aberrant diffuse expression of p63 in adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy: report of 21 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:461-467.