Decision support approach based on multiple objectives and resources for assessing the relocation plan of dangerous hillside aggregations

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 202, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 265-272

  Juan, Yi Kai ^a,b   Castro, Daniel ^c   Roper, Kathy ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support; Fuzzy logic; Hillside aggregation relocation; Multi objective programming (MOP); Operational research in government

Indexed keywords

BUDGET ALLOCATION; DECISION PROBLEMS; DECISION SUPPORT; DECISION SUPPORTS; DELPHI METHOD; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; HILLSIDE AGGREGATION RELOCATION; HUMAN SETTLEMENTS; HYBRID APPROACH; LOSS OF LIFE; MATERIAL DAMAGES; MATERIAL LOSS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING (MOP); MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; OPERATIONAL RESEARCH IN GOVERNMENT; PRIORITIZATION; PROJECT SELECTION; RESOURCE PLANNING;

BUDGET CONTROL; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FUZZY INFERENCE; FUZZY SETS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

FUZZY LOGIC;

EID: 70349751585     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Araz C., Ozfirat P.M., and Ozkarahan I. An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management. Computers & Operations Research 34 12 (2007) 3738-3756
2. Barbolini M., Cappabianca F., and Savi F. Risk assessment in avalanche-prone areas. Annals of Glaciology 38 (2004) 115-122
3. Chan E., and Lee G.K.L. Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research 85 (2008) 243-256
4. Department of Economic Development (DED), 2005. Spring of Hillside Aggregation: Relocation Projects for Dangerous Hillside Aggregation of Taipei City. Department of Economic Development of Taipei City Government, Taipei, Taiwan.
5. Holsapple C.W., and Joshi K.D. Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study. Information & Management 39 (2002) 477-490
6. Islam S., and Roy T.K. A new fuzzy multi-objective programming: entropy based geometric programming and its application of transportation problems. European Journal of Operational Research 173 2 (2006) 387-404
7. Jozefowiez N., Semet F., and Talbi E.-G. Multi-objective vehicle routing problems. European Journal of Operational Research 189 2 (2008) 293-309
8. Ko C.H., and Cheng M.Y. Hybrid use of AI techniques in developing construction management tools. Automation in Construction 12 (2003) 271-281
9. Lieberman E.R. Soviet multi-objective mathematical programming methods: an overview. Management Science 37 9 (1991) 1147-1165
10. Mayer I.S., Van Bueren E.M., Bots P., and Van Der Voort H. Collaborative decisionmaking for sustainable urban renewal projects: a simulation-gaming approach. Environment and Planning: B. Planning and Design 32 (2005) 403-423
11. Perng Y.H., Hsueh S.L., and Yan M.R. Evaluation of housing construction strategies in China using fuzzy-logic system. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 9 (2005) 215-232
12. Perng Y.H., Juan Y.K., and Hsu H.S. Genetic algorithm-based decision support for the restoration budget allocation of historical buildings. Building and Environment 42 (2007) 770-778
13. Weber R., Werners B., and Zimmerman H. Planning models for research and development. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990) 175-188
14. Yu W.D., and Skibniewski M.J. Quantitative constructability analysis with a neuro-fuzzy knowledge-based multi-criterion decision support system. Automation in Construction 8 (1999) 553-565
15. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 3 (1965) 338-353