Comparison of two models for the estimation of usual intake addressing zero consumption and non-normality

Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1433-1449

  de Boer, Waldo J ^a   van der Voet, Hilko ^a   Bokkers, Bas G H ^b   Bakker, Martine I ^b   Boon, Polly E ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acrylamide; Alkaloids; Exposure; Fruit; Modeling; Mycotoxins; Other natural toxicants; Potatoes; Probabilistic modeling; Processed foods; Risk assessment; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

ACRYLAMIDE; ALKALOID; PATULIN; SOLANINE;

ARTICLE; BETABINOMIAL NORMAL MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIETARY INTAKE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOOD MODEL; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 70349750268     PISSN: 19440049     EISSN: 14645122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02652030903161606     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Blom G. 1958. Statistical estimates and transformed Betavariables. New York, NY: Wiley.
2. Boon PE, Bakker MI, Van Klaveren JD, Van Rossum CTM. 2009. Risk assessment of the dietary exposure to contaminants and pesticide residues in young children in the Netherlands, report 350070002. Bilthoven (The Netherlands): National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
3. De Boer WJ, Van der Voet H. 2005. MCRA, Release 4, a web-based program for Monte Carlo Risk Assessment. Report December 2005 [Internet]. Wageningen (The Netherlands): Biometris, RIKILT and RIVM. Available from: http://mcra.rikilt.wur.nl.
4. De Boer WJ, Van der Voet H. 2007. MCRA, Release 6, a web-based program for Monte Carlo Risk Assessment. Report July 2007 [Internet]. Wageningen (The Netherlands): Biometris, RIKILT aHd RIVM. Available from: http://mcra.rikilt.wur.nl.
5. Dodd KW. 1996. A technical guide to C-SIDE. Technical Report 96-TR 32 [Internet]. Iowa State University, Ames (IA): Department of Statistics and Center for Agricultural and Rural Development. Available from: http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/DBS/PDFFiles/96tr32.pdf.
6. Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Tooze JA, Krebs-Smith SM. 2006. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: A review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc. 106:1640-1650.
7. Efron B. 1979. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 7:1-26.
8. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
9. Gurka MJ, Edwards LJ, Muller KE, Kupper LL. 2006. Extending the Box-Cox transformation to the linear mixed model. J R Stat Soc A. 2:273-288.
10. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ. 1990. Generalized additive models. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall.
11. Hoffmann K, Boeing H, Dufour A, Volatier JL, Telman J, Virtanen M, Becker W, De Henauw S. 2002. Estimating the distribution of usual dietary intake by short-term measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr. 56(2):S53-S62.
12. Kistemaker C, Bouman M, Hulshof KFAM. 1998. De consumptie van afzonderlijke producten door Nederlandse bevolkingsgroepen - Voedselconsumptiepeiling 1997-1998 (Consumption of food products by Dutch population groups - Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 1997-1998) (V98.912). Zeist (The Netherlands): TNO-Voeding.
13. Nusser SM, Carriquiry AL, Dodd KW, Fuller WA. 1996. A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 91:1440-1449.
14. Nusser SM, Fuller WA, Guenther PM. 1997. Estimating usual dietary intake distributions: Adjusting for measurement error and nonnormality in 24-hour food intake data. In: Lyberg L, Biemer P, Collins M, DeLeeuw E, Dippo C, Schwartz N, Trewin D, editors. Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York, NY: Wileyp. 689-709.
15. Ocké MC, Van Rossum CTM, Fransen HP, Buurma EM, De Boer EJ, Brants HAM, Niekerk EM, Van der Laan JD, Drijvers JJMM, Ghameshlou Z. 2008. Dutch National Food Consumption Survey-Young Children 2005/2006. Report 350070001 [Internet]. Bilthoven (The Netherlands): RIVM. Available from: http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/350070001.html.
16. Robinson GK. 1991. That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Stat Sci. 6:15-51.
17. Ruprich J, Rehurkova I, Boon PE, Svensson K,Moussavian S, Van der Voet H, Bosgra S, Van Klaveren JD, Busk L. 2009. Probabilistic modeling of exposure doses and implications for health risk characterization: glycoalkaloids from potatoes. Food Chem Toxicol. in press. DOI: 10.1016/ j.fct2009.03.008.
18. Slob W. 1993. Modeling long-term exposure of the whole population to chemicals in food. Risk Anal. 13:525-530.
19. Slob W. 2002. Dose-response modeling of continuous endpoints. Toxicol Sci. 66: 298-312.
20. Slob W. 2006. Probabilistic dietary exposure assessment taking into account variability in both amount and frequency of consumption. Food Chem Toxicol. 44:933-951 (Corrigendum in Food Chem Toxicol. 44:1952).
21. Stephens MA. 1974. EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc. 69:730-737.
22. Tooze JA, Midthune D, Dodd KW, Freedman LS, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, Guenther PM, Carroll RJ, Kipnis V. 2006. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc. 106:1575-1587.
23. Van der Voet H, De Mul A, Van Klaveren JD. 2007. A probabilistic model for simultaneous exposure to multiple compounds from food and its use for risk-benefit assessment. Food Chem Toxicol. 45:1496-1506.
24. Van Dooren MMH, Boeijen I, Van Klaveren JD, Van Donkersgoed G. 1995. Conversie van consumeerbare voedingsmiddelen naar primaire agrarische produkten (Conversion of consumed foods into raw agricultural commodities) [Internet]. Wageningen (The Netherlands): RIKILT-DLO. Available from: http://www.rikilt.wur.nl.
25. Waijers PMCM, Dekkers ALM, Boer JMA, Boshuizen HC, Van Rossum CTM. 2006. The potential of AGE MODE, an age-dependent model, to estimate usual intakes and prevalences of inadequate intakes in a population. J Nutr. 136:2916-2920.