High versus low performing virtual design teams: A preliminary analysis of communication

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 2000-January, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Ocker, Rosalie J ^a   Fjermestad, Jerry ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

ASYNCHRONOUS COMMUNICATION; COMPETITIVE PRESSURE; DESIGN ALTERNATIVES; FACE-TO-FACE TEAMS; GLOBAL MARKETPLACES; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; VIRTUAL DESIGN TEAMS; VIRTUAL PROJECT TEAMS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 70349748056     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Cutosksy, M.R.; Tenenbaum, J.M.; and Glicksman, J. (1996). Madefast: Collaborative engineering over the Internet, Communications of the ACM, 39, 9, 78-87.
2. Daft, R. & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and d structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
3. Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. (1999). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3, 7-149.
4. Hayes, W.L., Statistics for the Social Sciences, Holt Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1973.
5. Kinney, S. T., & Panko, R. R. (1996). Project teams: Profiles and member perceptions-Implications for group support system research and products. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kihei, Maui, 128-137.
6. Moran, T.P. & Carroll, J.M. (Eds.) Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
7. Nunamaker, J.F., Briggs, R.O., Mittleman, D.D., Vogel, D.R. (1996/97). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 3, 163-207.
8. Ocker, R.J.; Hiltz, S.R.; Turoff, M.; Fjermestad, J. (1995/96). The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 3, 127-153.
9. Ocker, R.J., Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K. (1998). Effects of four modes of group communication on the outcomes of software requirements determination, Journal of Management Information Systems, 15,1,99-118.
10. Ocker, R.J. & Fjermestad, J. (1998). Web-Based Computer-Mediated Communication: An Experimental Investigation Comparing Three Communication Modes for Determining Software Requirements, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, January.
11. Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S., Carter, M., and Storrosten, M. (1992). Small group design meetings, An analysis of collaboration. Human Computer Interaction, 7(4),347-374.
12. Poole, M.S. & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems, The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (Eds). Organizations and Communication Technology, Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
13. Poole. M.S. & Hirokawa, R.Y. (1986). Communication and Group Decision Making. New York: Sage.
14. Putnam., L.L. (1981). Procedural messages and small group work climates: A lag sequential analysis. Communication Yearbook 5, pp. 331-350. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
15. Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction, Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
16. Walther, J.B. (1994). Anticipated onging interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
17. Warkentin, M.E., Sayeed, L., Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System, Decision Sciences, 28, 4, 975-996.