Utility driven adaptive workflow execution

2009 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, CCGRID 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 220-227

  Lee, Kevin ^a   Paton, Norman W ^a   Sakellariou, Rizos ^a   Fernandes, Alvaro A A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE WORKFLOW; CANDIDATE MAPPINGS; COMPUTATIONAL RESOURCES; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; MAP TASK; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PHYSICAL RESOURCES; RESOURCE MAPPING; RESPONSE TIME; SHARED RESOURCES; UTILITY FUNCTIONS; UTILITY MEASURE; WORK-FLOWS; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

CLUSTER COMPUTING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; GRID COMPUTING; MAPPING; PROFITABILITY; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 70349743821     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CCGRID.2009.15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J. Blythe, S. Jain, E. Deelman, Y. Gil, K. Vahi, A. Mandal, and K. Kennedy. Task scheduling strategies for workflow-based applications in grids. In CCGrid'05, pages 759-767, 2005.
2. M. Wieczorek, R. Prodan, and T. Fahringer. Scheduling of scientific workflows in the ASKALON grid environment. In SIGMOD Record, 34(3), 2005.
3. E. Deelman et al. Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Scientific Programming, 13(3):219-237, 2005.
4. T. Heinis, C. Pautasso, and G. Alonso. Design and evaluation of an autonomic workflow engine. In 2nd International Conference on Autonomic Computing, pages 27-38. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
5. R. Duan, R. Prodan, and T. Fahringer. Run-time optimisation of grid workflow applications. In Proc. Intl. Conference on Grid Computing, pages 33-40. IEEE Press, 2006.
6. Z. Yu and W. Shi. An adaptive rescheduling strategy for grid workflow applications. In IPDPS, pages 1-8. IEEE Press, 2007.
7. R. Sakellariou and H. Zhao. A low-cost rescheduling policy for efficient mapping of workflows on grid systems. Scientific Programming, 12(4):253-262, 2004.
8. K. Lee, R. Sakellariou, N. W. Paton, and A. A. A. Fernandes. Workflow adaptation as an autonomic computing problem. In Proc. 2nd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, pages 29-34. ACM Press, 2007.
9. J.O. Kephart and D.M. Chess. The Vision of Autonomic Computing. IEEE Computer, 36(1):41-50, 2003.
10. J.O. Kephart and R. Das. Achieving self-management via utility functions. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(1):40-48, 2007.
11. K. Lee, N.W. Paton, R. Sakellariou, E. Deelman, A. A. A. Fernandes, and G. Metha. Adaptive workflow processing and execution in pegasus. In 3rd Intl Workshop on Workflow Management and Applications in Grid Environments (WaGe08), in Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Grid and Pervasive Computing Symposia/Workshops, pages 99-106. IEEE Press, 2008.
12. C. Audet and J. E. Dennis. Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J. on Optimization, 17(1):188-217, 2006.
13. M. Wieczorek, A. Hoheisel, and R. Prodan. Towards a general model of the multi-criteria workflow scheduling on the grid. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(3):237-256, 2009.
14. J. Yu and R. Buyya. Scheduling scientific workflow applications with deadline and budget constraints using genetic algorithms. Scientific Programming, 14:217-230, 2006.
15. W.E. Walsh, G. Tesauro, J.O. Kephart, and R. Das. Utility functions in autonomic systems. In Proc. ICAC, pages 70-77. IEEE Press, 2004.
16. M.N. Bennani and D.A. Menasce. Resource allocation for autonomic data centres using analytic performance models. In Proc. 2nd ICAC, pages 229-240. IEEE Press, 2005.
17. M. A. Abramson, C. Audet, and J. E. Dennis. Nonlinear programing with mesh adaptive direct searches. SIAG/Optimization Views-and-News, 17(1):2-11, 2006.
18. J. Frey, T. Tannenbaum, M. Livny, I. T. Foster, and S. Tuecke. CondorG: A computation management agent for multi-institutional grids. In HPDC, pages 55-63, 2001.