Implementing electronic health record-based quality measures for developmental screening

Pediatrics

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Jensen, Roxanne E ^a   Chan, Kitty S ^a   Weiner, Jonathan P ^a   Fowles, Jinnet B ^b   Neale, Shannon M ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b PARK NICOLLET INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c PARK NICOLLET CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Child; Computerized; Developmental disabilities; Health care; Medical records systems; Quality indicators

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PEDIATRICS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70349742517     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3091     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Burt CW, Sisk JE. Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1334-1343 (Pubitemid 41577125)
2. Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B. Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1323-1333 (Pubitemid 41577124)
3. Menachemi N, Ettel DL, Brooks RG, Simpson L. Charting the use of electronic health records and other information technologies among child health providers. BMC Pediatr. 2006;6:21 (Pubitemid 44270132)
4. Adams WG, Mann AM, Bauchner H. Use of an electronic medical record improves the quality of urban pediatric primary care. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):626-632 (Pubitemid 36330723)
5. Boyle CA, Decoufle P, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Prevalence and health impact of developmental disabilities in US children. Pediatrics. 1994;93(3):399-403 (Pubitemid 24067011)
6. Guralnick MJ. Effectiveness of early intervention for vulnerable children: a developmental perspective. Am J Ment Retard. 1998;102(4):319-345 (Pubitemid 28078420)
7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, and Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):405-420
8. McCormick MC, Brooks-Gunn J, Buka SL, et al. Early intervention in low birth weight premature infants: results at 18 years of age for the Infant Health and Development Program. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):771-780 (Pubitemid 46063219)
9. Hix-Small H, Marks K, Squires J, Nickel R. Impact of implementing developmental screening at 12 and 24 months in a pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2007;120(2):381-389 (Pubitemid 47219509)
10. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Children with Disabilities. Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):192-195
11. Halfon N, Regalado M, Sareen H, et al. Assessing development in the pediatric office. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6 suppl):1926-1933
12. Sices L, Feudtner C, McLaughlin J, Drotar D, Williams M. How do primary care physicians identify young children with developmental delays? A national survey. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24(6): 409-417 (Pubitemid 38035609)
13. Schmittdiel J, McMenamin SB, Halpin HA, et al. The use of patient and physician reminders for preventive services: results from a national study of physician organizations. Prev Med. 2004; 39(5):1000-1006 (Pubitemid 39314470)
14. Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3(6):399-409 (Pubitemid 126445041)
15. Schellhase KG, Koepsell TD, Norris TE. Providers' reactions to an automated health maintenance reminder system incorporated into the patient's electronic medical record. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16(4):312-317
16. Glascoe FP. Are overreferrals on developmental screening tests really a problem? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(1):54-59
17. Rydz D, Srour M, Oskoui M, et al. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(4). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/118/4/e1178 (Pubitemid 46393768)
18. Caro JJ, Caro I, Caro J, Wouters F, Juniper EF. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? Qual Life Res. 2001;10(8): 683-691 (Pubitemid 34145319)
19. Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, van der Ploeg HM, Heine RJ, Brand AN. A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-Being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Qual Life Res. 1998;7(1):33-38 (Pubitemid 28113963)
20. Drummond HE, Ghosh S, Ferguson A, Brackenridge D, Tiplady B. Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual Life Res. 1995;4(1):21-26
21. Sargent JD. Web-based assistance for physicians caring for children with ADHD. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(3):127-135
22. Bhatara VS, Vogt HB, Patrick S, Doniparthi L, Ellis R. Acceptability of a Web-based attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder scale (T-SKAMP) by teachers: a pilot study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006; 19(2):195-200 (Pubitemid 44046983)
23. Hazlehurst B, Sittig DF, Stevens VJ, et al. Natural language processing in the electronic medical record: assessing clinician adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 29(5):434-439 (Pubitemid 41817395)
24. Voorham J, Denig P; Groningen Initiative to Analyse Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Group. Computerized extraction of information on the quality of diabetes care from free text in electronic patient records of general practitioners. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(3):349-354