Quantitative ethnobotany or quantification in ethnobotany?

Ethnobotany Research and Applications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages 1-4

  De Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349740559     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15473465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Ayala, F.J. 1994. On the scientific method, its practice and pitfall. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16:205-240.
2. Balée, W. 1987. Etnobotânica quantitativa dos índios Tembé (Rio Gurupi, Pará). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Serie Botânica 3:29-50.
3. Cunha, L.V.F. & U.P. Albuquerque. 2006. Quantitative ethnobotany in an Atlantic forest fragment of Northeastern Brazil - implications to conservation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 114:1-25.
4. DeWalt, S.J., G. Bourdy, L.R Chavez De Michel & C. Quenevo. 1999. Ethnobotany of the Tacana: Quantitative inventories of two permanent plots of Northwestern Bolivia. Economic Botany 53:237-260.
5. Kuhn, T. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Monteiro, J.M., U.P. Albuquerque, E.M.F. Lins-Neto, E.L. Araújo & E.L.C. Amorim. 2006. Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among two rural communities in Brazil's semi-arid northeastern region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 105:173-186.
7. Nudler, O. 2002. Campos controversiales: Hacia un modelo de su estructura y dinámica. Revista Patagónica de Filosofia 3:9-22.
8. Peters, R.H. 1991. A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Phillips, O. & A.H. Gentry. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47:15-32.
10. Phillips, O. & A.H. Gentry. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47:33-43.
11. Popper, K.R. 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, Milton Park. (first published in 1934 as Logik der Forschung, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).
12. Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
13. Prance, G.T., W. Balée, B.M. Boom & R.L Carneiro. 1987. Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1:296-310.
14. Reyes-García, V., N. Marti, T.W. McDade, S. Tanner & V. Vadez. 2007. Concepts and methods in studies measuring individual ethnobotanical knowledge. Journal of Ethnobiology 27:108-203.