Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 953-961

  Dudukovic, Nicole M ^a,b   DuBrow, Sarah ^a   Wagner, Anthony D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTENTION DISTURBANCE; DISTRACTIBILITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349734606     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.7.953     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BADDELEY, A., LEWIS, V., ELDRIDGE, M., & THOMSON, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518-540. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.518
2. BATCHELDER, W. H., & RIEFER, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.548
3. BAYEN, U. J., MURNANE, K., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 197-215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.197 (Pubitemid 126027146)
4. BUTLER, A. C., MARSH, E. J., GOODE, M. K., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (2006). When additional multiple-choice lures aid versus hinder later memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 941-956. doi:10.1002/acp.1239
5. CARRIER, M., & PASHLER, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642.
6. CHAN, J. C. K., & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (2007). The testing effect in recognition memory: A dual process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 431-437. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.431
7. CRAIK, F. I. M., GOVONI, R., NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., & ANDERSON, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159 (Pubitemid 126420578)
8. FERNANDES, M. A., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 155-176. doi:10.1037/0096- 3445.129.2.155
9. FERNANDES, M. A., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (2002). Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words. Memory & Cognition, 30, 731-744.
10. FERNANDES, M. A., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (2003). Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 18, 219-230. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.219 (Pubitemid 36693584)
11. GARDINER, J. M., & KLEE, H. (1976). Memory for remembered events: An assessment of output monitoring in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 227-233. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90042-6
12. GATES, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6, 1-104.
13. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (2000). Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1483-1498. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6. 1483
14. HOGAN, R. M., & KINTSCH, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 562-567. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80029-4
15. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
16. JACOBY, L. L., SHIMIZU, Y., DANIELS, K. A., & RHODES, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 852-857.
17. JACOBY, L. L., SHIMIZU, Y., VELANOVA, K., & RHODES, M. G. (2005). Age differences in depth of retrieval: Memory for foils. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 493-504. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.007 (Pubitemid 40473681)
18. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
19. KENSINGER, E. A., CLARKE, R. J., & CORKIN, S. (2003). What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2407-2415. (Pubitemid 36368929)
20. KNOTT, L. M., & DEWHURST, S. A. (2007). The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: A comparison of DRM and categorized lists. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1954-1965.
21. LANDAUER, T. K., & BJORK, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625-632). London: Academic Press.
22. LOZITO, J. P., & MULLIGAN, N. W. (2006). Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: Effects of semantic encoding and divided attention. Memory & Cognition, 34, 986-998.
23. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., HANCOCK, T. W., & MUNSAYAC, K. (2002). Investigating the output monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 30, 302-311. (Pubitemid 34595847)
24. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 27-47. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.27 (Pubitemid 128548211)
25. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2004). Generation and memory for contextual detail. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 838-855. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.838
26. MURNANE, K., & BAYEN, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428.
27. NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., CRAIK, F. I. M., GUEZ, J., & DORI, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1091-1104. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.5. 1091
28. NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., CRAIK, F. I. M., PERRETTA, J. G., & Tonev, S. T. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 609-625. doi:10.1080/027249800410454
29. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & KARPICKE, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
30. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & KARPICKE, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
31. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MARSH, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1155-1159. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155 (Pubitemid 41677514)
32. SIMONS, J. S., KOUTSTAAL, W., PRINCE, S., WAGNER, A. D., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: Evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. NeuroImage, 19, 613-626. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00096-X
33. SKINNER, E. I., & FERNANDES, M. A. (2008). Interfering with remembering and knowing: Effects of divided attention at retrieval. Acta Psychologica, 127, 211-221. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.001
34. STAHL, C., & KLAUER, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267-273.
35. SUGIMORI, E., & KUSUMI, T. (2009). Limiting attentional resources influences performance and output monitoring of an event-based prospective memory task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 112-128. doi:10.1080/09541440802003108
36. TROYER, A. K., WINOCUR, G., CRAIK, F. I. M., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks. Neuropsychology, 13, 467-474. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.13.4.467
37. TULVING, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12. doi:10.1037/h0080017
38. WHEELER, M. A., EWERS, M., & BUONANNO, J. F. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials. Memory, 11, 571-580. doi:10.1080/09658210244000414
39. YONELINAS, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864