Adaptive interventions may optimize outcomes in drug courts: A pilot study

Current Psychiatry Reports

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 370-376

  Marlowe, Douglas B ^a   Festinger, David S ^a   Arabia, Patricia L ^a   Dugosh, Karen L ^a   Benasutti, Kathleen M ^a   Croft, Jason R ^a  

^a TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE INTERVENTION; ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PUNISHMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDIZATION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COUNSELING; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; JUDICIAL ROLE; MALE; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70349728572     PISSN: 15233812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-009-0056-3     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KA: A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev Sci 2004, 5: 185-196.
2. Murphy SA: An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med 2005, 24: 1455-1481.
3. Murphy SA, Lynch KG, McKay JR, et al.: Developing adaptive treatment strategies in substance abuse research. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007, 88: S24-S30.
4. Reid R, Pipe A, Higginson L, et al.: Stepped care approach to smoking cessation in patients hospitalized for coronary artery disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2003, 23: 176-182.
5. Brooner RK, Kidorf MS, King VL, et al.: Behavioral contingencies improve counseling attendance in an adaptive treatment model. J Subst Abuse Treat 2004, 27: 223-232.
6. Brooner RK, Kidorf M, Stoller KB, et al.: Comparing adaptive stepped care and monetary-based voucher interventions for opioid dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007, 88: 14-23.
7. Kidorf M, Neufeld K, Brooner RK: Combining stepped care approaches with behavioral reinforcement to motivate employment in opioid-dependent out-patients. Subst Use Misuse 2004, 39: 2215-2238.
8. King VL, Stoller KB, Hayes M, et al.: A multicenter randomized evaluation of methadone medical maintenance. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002, 65: 137-148.
9. Kidorf M, Neufeld K, King VL, et al.: A stepped care approach for reducing cannabis use in opioid-dependent outpatients. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007, 32: 341-347.
10. Breslin FC, Eobell MB, Sobell LC, et al.: Problem drinkers: evaluation of a stepped-care approach. J Subst Abuse 1999, 10: 217-232.
11. O'Malley SS, Rounsaville BJ, Farren C, et al.: Initial and maintenance naltrexone treatment for alcohol dependence using primary care versus specialty care: A nested sequence of 3 randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163: 1695-1704.
12. National Association of Drug Court Professionals: Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice; 1997.
13. Arabia PL, Fox G, Caughie J, et al.: Sanctioning practices in an adult felony drug court. Drug Court Rev 2008, 6: 1-31.
14. Marlowe DB: Strategies for administering rewards and sanctions. In Drug Courts: A New Approach to Treatment and Rehabilitation. Edited by Lessenger JE, Roper GF. New York: Springer; 2007:317-336.
15. Marlowe DB: Application of sanctions. In Quality Improvement for Drug Courts: Evidence-based Practices. Edited by Hardin C, Kushner JN. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute; 2008:107-114.
16. Marlowe DB, Wong CJ: Contingency management in adult criminal drug courts. In Contingency Management in Substance Abuse Treatment. Edited by Higgins ST, Silverman K, Heil SH. New York: Guilford; 2008:334-354.
17. Aos S, Miller M, Drake E: Evidence-based Public Policy Options to Reduce Future Prison Construction, Criminal Justice Costs, and Crime Rates. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2006.
18. Latimer J, Morton-Bourgon K, Chretien J: A Meta-analytic Examination of Drug Treatment Courts: Do They Reduce Recidivism? Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canada Department of Justice, Research & Statistics Division; 2006.
19. Lowenkamp CT, HolsingAr AM, Latessa EJ: Are drug courts effective: a meta-analytic review. J Community Correct 2005, Fall: 5-28.
20. Shaffer DK: Reconsidering Drug Court Effectiveness: A Meta-analytic Review. Las Vegas, NV: Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada; 2006.
21. Wilson DB, Mitchell O, MacKenzie DL: A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. J Exp Criminol 2006, 2: 459-487.
22. Bhati AS, Roman JK, Chalfin A: To Treat or Not to Treat: Evidence on the Prospects of Expanding Treatment to Druginvolved Offenders. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2008.
23. Aubrey F, Aerman G: Going to scale: a conversation about the future of drug courts. Court Rev 2002, Fall: 4-13.
24. Farole DJ, Puffett N, Rempel M, Byrne F: Can Innovation Be Institutionalized? Problem-Solving in Mainstream Courts. New York: Center for Court Innovation; 2004.
25. Sobell MB, Sobell LC: Stepped care as a heuristic approach to the treatment of alcohol problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000, 68: 573-579.
26. Rothbard A, Alterman A, Rutherford M, et al.: Revisiting the effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment on crime reductions in the 1990s. J Subst Abuse Treat 1999, 16: 329-335.
27. Marlowe DB, Patapis NS, DeMatteo DS: Amenability to treatment of drug offenders. Fed Probat 2003, 67: 40-46.
28. Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Arabia PL, et al.: Adaptive interventions in drug court: A pilot experiment. Crim Just Rev 2008, 33: 343-360.
29. Festinger DS, Marlowe DB, Lee PA, et al.: Status hearings in drug court: when more is less and less is more. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002, 68: 151-157.
30. Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Dugosh KL, et al.: Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: Discharge and six-month outcomes from a prospective matching study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007, 88S: 4-13.
31. Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lee PA, et al.: Matching judicial supervision to clients' risk status in drug court. Crime Delinq 2006, 52: 52-76.
32. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, edn 4 (text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
33. Luborsky L, Barber JP, Siqueland L, et al.: The revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq-II) psychometric properties. J Psychother Pract Res 1996, 5: 260-271.
34. Ganju V, Beall MA, Callahan N, et al.: The MHSIP Consumeroriented Mental Health Report Card. Washington, DC: Center for Mental Health Services (SAMHSA, DHHS); 1996.
35. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, edn 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
36. Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Foltz C, et al.: Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behav Sci Law 2005, 23: 183-198.
37. Burke K, Leben A: Procedural fairness: a key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Rev 2007, 44: 4-24.