Can nanotechnology be just? On nanotechnology and the emerging movement for global justice

NanoEthics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 129-136

  Jamison, Andrew ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Global justice; Innovation; Nanotechnology; Social movements

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349728282     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0064-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Elzinga A (1985) Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria. In: Wittrock B, Elzinga A (eds) The University Research System. The public policies of the home of scientists. Almqvist & Wiksell International
2. Elzinga A, Jamison A (1995) Changing policy agendas in science and technology. In: Jasanoff S et al (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies, Sage
3. Encyclopedia Britannica (2006) http://www.britannica.com/eb/ article-9041378/hubris, accessed 26/09/06
4. EU (2009) http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/cooperation/ nanotechnology_en.html, accessed 26/06/09
5. Eyerman R, Jamison A (1991) Social movements. A cognitive approach. Polity
6. Gibbons M et al (1994) The new production of knowledge. Sage
7. Hardt M, Negri A (2004) Multitude. Penguin
8. Hård M, Jamison A (2005) Hubris and hybrids. A cultural history of technology and science. Routledge
9. Jamison A (2006) Social movements and science: Cultural appropriations of cognitive Praxis, in Science as Culture, nr 1
10. Jamison A, Baark E (1990) Modes of biotechnology assessment in the USA, Japan and Denmark, in Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, nr 2
11. Jamison A, Eyerman R (1994) Seeds of the sixties. University of California Press
12. Klein N (2001) No Logo. Flamingo
13. Latour B (1998) From the world of science to that of research, in Science, 10 April
14. Mumford L (1979) Interpretations and forecasts, 1922-1972. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
15. Shiva V (2000) Stolen harvest. South End Press
16. von Wright GH (1978) Humanismen som livshållning och andra essäer. MånPocket