Significance of the weibull distribution and its sub-models in natural image statistics

VISAPP 2009 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 355-362

  Yanulevskaya, Victoria ^a   Geusebroek, Jan Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Model selection; Natural image statistics; Weibull distribution

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST STATISTICS; GLOBAL STATISTICS; LOCAL IMAGE STATISTICS; LOCAL STATISTICS; MODEL SELECTION; MODEL SELECTION TECHNIQUES; NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICS; NATURAL IMAGES; SUBMODELS; VISUAL CONTENT;

COMPUTER VISION; DISCRETE COSINE TRANSFORMS; INFORMATION THEORY; STATISTICS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 70349705937     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. Int. Sympos. Inform. Theory (pp. 267-281).
2. Baddeley, R. J. & Tatler, B. W. (2006). High frequency edges (but not contrast) predict where we fixate: A Bayesian system identification analysis. Vision Res., 46(18), 2824-2833.
3. Burghouts, G. J., Smeulders, A. W. M. & Geusebroek, J. M. (2007). The distribution family of similarity distances. In NIPS.
4. Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer.
5. Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261.
6. Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 4, 2370-2393.
7. Filliben, J. J. (2002). NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/. NIST Gaithersburg.
8. Geusebroek, J. M. & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2003). Fragmentation in the vision of scenes. In ICCV.
9. Geusebroek, J. M. & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2005). A six-stimulus theory for stochastic texture. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 62(1), 1-16.
10. van Hateren, J. H. (1998). Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Biological Sciences, 265 (1394), 359-366.
11. Huang, J. & Mumford, D. (1999). Statistics of natural images and models.
12. Ittd, L., Koch, C. & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 20(11), 1254-1259.
13. Mallat, S. G. (1989). A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 11(7), 674-693.
14. Mante, V., Frazor, R. A., Bonin, V., Geisler, W. S. & Carandini, M. (2005). Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system. Nature Neurosci., 8(12), 1690-7.
15. Nedovic, V., Smeulders, A. W. M., Redert, A. & Geusebroek, J. M. (2007). Depth information by stage classification. In ICCV.
16. Oliva, A. & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 42(3), 145-175.
17. Pelli, D. G. & Tillman, K. A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neurosc. (p. to appear in October).
18. Reinagel, P. & Zador, A. (1999). Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. Network: Comput. Neural Syst., 10(4), 341-350.
19. Scholte, H. S., Ghebreab, S., Smeulders, A. W. M. & Lamme, V. (2008). The parvo and magno-cellular systems encode natural image statistics parameters. J. Vision, 8(6), 686a.
20. Simoncelli, E. P. (1999). Modeling the joint statistics of images in the wavelet domain. Volume 3813 (pp. 188-195).
21. Srivastava, A., Lee, A. B., Simoncelli, E. P. & Zhu, S. C. (2003). On Advances in Statistical Modeling of Natural Images. J. Math. Imaging Vision, 18(1), 17-33.