Interpolatory point set surfacesconvexity and Hermite data

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Alexa, Marc ^a   Adamson, Anders ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Hermite data; Interpolation; Point based modeling

Indexed keywords

DATA POINTS; GRADIENT FIELDS; HERMITE; HERMITE DATA; INTERPOLATORY; POINT DATA; POINT SET; POINT SET SURFACE; POINT-BASED MODELING; SCATTERED POINTS; SHAPE CONTROL; SINGULAR WEIGHT; SURFACE DEFINITION; WEIGHTED CENTROID;

FUNCTION EVALUATION; GEOMETRY; INTERPOLATION;

SET THEORY;

EID: 70349690232     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1516522.1516531     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ADAMSON, A. AND ALEXA, M. 2004. Approximating bounded, nonorientable surfaces from points. In Proceedings of the Shape Modeling International Conference, F. Giannini and A. Pasko, Eds. IEEE Computer Society, 243-252.
2. ADAMSON, A. AND ALEXA, M. 2005. Point-Sampled cell complexes. ACM Trans. Comput. Graph. 25, 3, 671-680.
3. ALEXA, M. AND ADAMSON, A. 2004. On normals and projection operators for surfaces defined by point sets. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Point-based Graphics,M. Alexa, et al., Eds. Eurographics, 149-156.
4. ALEXA, M., BEHR, J., COHEN-OR, D., FLEISHMAN, S., LEVIN, D., AND SILVA, C. T. 2003. Computing and rendering point set surfaces. IEEE Trans. Comput. Graph. and Visualization 9, 1, 3-15.
5. AMENTA, N. AND KIL, Y. 2004a. The domain of a point set surface. In Proceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE Symposium on Point-Based Graphics. Eurographics, 139-148.
6. AMENTA, N. AND KIL, Y. J. 2004b. Defining point set surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 264-270.
7. BOISSONNAT, J.-D. AND CAZALS, F. 2000. Smooth shape reconstruction via natural neighbor interpolation of distance functions. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SCG-00). ACM Press, New York, 223-232.
8. BREMER, P.-T. AND HART, J. C. 2005. A sampling theorem for mls surfaces. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Point-Based Graphics. Eurographics, 47-54.
9. DEY, T. K.,GOSWAMI, S., AND SUN, J. 2005. Extremal surface based projections converge and reconstruct with isotopy. Tech. rep. OSU-CISRC- 05-TR25, Stanford University. http://www.stanford.edu/¡«sunjian.
10. DEY, T. K. AND SUN, J. 2005. An adaptive MLS surface for reconstruction with guarantees. In Proceedings of the ACMSymposium on Geometry Processing. Eurographics, 43-52.
11. KOBBELT, L. ANDBOTSCH,M. 2004. Asurvey of point-based techniques in computer graphics. Comput. Graph. 28, 6, 801-814.
12. KOLLURI, R. 2005. Provably good moving least squares. In Proceedings of theACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. SIAM, 1008-1018.
13. LEVIN, D. 1998. The approximation power of moving least-squares. Math. Comput. 67, 224, 1517-1531. (Pubitemid 128383317)
14. LEVIN, D. 2003. Mesh-Independent surface interpolation. In Geometric Modeling for Data Visualization. Springer, 37-49.
15. PAULY, M., KAISER, R., KOBBELT, L., AND GROSS, M. 2003. Shape modeling with point-sampled geometry. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 641-650.
16. SHEN, C., O'BRIEN, J. F., AND SHEWCHUK, J. R. 2004. Interpolating and approximating implicit surfaces from polygon soup. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 896-904.
17. WALD, I. AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2005. Interactive ray tracing of point based models. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Point-Based Graphics. Eurographics, 9-16.
18. WENDLAND, H. 1995. Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Adv. Comput. Math. 4, 4, 389-396.
19. ZWICKER, M., PAULY, M., KNOLL, O., AND GROSS, M. 2002. Pointshop 3d: An interactive system for point-based surface editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3, 322-329.