Warped factor analysis

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 23, Issue 7-8, 2009, Pages 371-384

  Hong, Sungjin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlation optimized warping; Dynamic time warping; Factor shape changes; Factor shifts; Multilinear; Parafac; Segment warping; Sequence comparison; Trilinear; Uniqueness

Indexed keywords

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

CORRELATION OPTIMIZED WARPING; DYNAMIC TIME WARPING; FACTOR SHAPE CHANGE; FACTOR SHIFT; MULTILINEAR; PARAFAC; SEGMENT WARPING; SEQUENCE COMPARISONS; SHAPE CHANGE; TRILINEAR; UNIQUENESS; WARPINGS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

EID: 70349686861     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1231     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bro R, Andersson CA, Kiers HAL. PARAFAC2-part II: modeling chro-matographic data with retention time shifts. J. Chemometr. 1999; 13: 295-309.
2. Field AS, Graupe D. Topographic component (parallel factor) analysis of multichannel evoked potentials: practical issues in trilinear spatio-temporal decompositions. Brain Topogr. 1991; 3: 407-423.
3. Harshman RA, Hong S, Lundy ME. Shifted factor analysis-part I: models and properties. J. Chemometr. 2003; 17: 363-378.
4. Tauler R. Multivariate curve resolution applied to second order data. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995; 30: 133-146.
5. Cattell RB. The structuring of change by P-technique and incremental R-technique. In Problems in Measuring Change, Harris CW (ed). Uni-versity of Wisconsin Press: Madison, 1963; 167-198.
6. Prazen BJ, Synovec RE, Kowalski BR. Standardization of second-order chromatographic/spectroscopic data for optimum chemical analysis. Anal. Chem. 1998; 70: 218-225.
7. Vogels JTWE, Tas AC, Venekamp J, van der Greef J. Partial linear fit: a new NMR spectroscopy preprocessing tool for pattern recognition applications. J. Chemometr. 1996; 10: 425-438.
8. Bylund D, Danielsson R, Malmquist G, Markides KE. Chromatographic alignment by warping and dynamic programming as a pre-processing tool for PARAFAC modeling for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data. J. Chromatogr. A 2002; 961: 237-244.
9. Nielsen N-PV, Carstensen JM, Smedsgaard J. Aligning of single and multiple wavelength chromatographic profiles for chemometric data analysis using correlation optimized warping. J. Chromatogr. A 1998; 805: 17-35.
10. Reiner E, Abbey LE, Moran TF, Papamichalis P, Schafer RW. Charac-terization of normal human cells by pyrolysis-gas-chromatorgraphy mass spectrometry. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1979; 6: 491-498.
11. Horn BKP, Schunck BG. Determining optical flow. Artif. Intell. 1981; 17: 185-203.
12. Westad F, Martens H. Shift and intensity modeling in spectroscopy-general concept and applications. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999; 45: 361-370.
13. Molenaar PCM. A dynamic factor analysis for the analysis of multi-variate time series. Psychometrika 1985; 50: 181-202.
14. Lawley DN. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 1940; 60: 64-82.
15. Torkkola K. Blind separation of delayed sources based on information maximization. Acoust Speech Signal Process. ICASSP-96 1996; 6: 3509-3512.
16. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. An information maximization approach to blind source separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995; 7: 1129-1159.
17. Yeredor A. Time-delay estimation in mixtures. Acoustics Speech Signal Process. ICASSP-03 2003; 5: 237-240.
18. Yeredor A. Non-orthogonal joint diagonalization in teh least-squares sense with application in blind source separation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2002; 50: 1545-1553.
19. Hong S, Harshman RA. Shifted factor analysis-part II: algorithms. J. Chemometr. 2003a; 17: 379-388.
20. Hong S, Harshman RA. Shifted factor analysis-part III: N-way generalization and application. J. Chemometr. 2003b; 17: 389-399.
21. Hong S. 1997; Shifted factor analysis: a test of models and algorithms. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
22. Mørup M, Hansen LK, Arnfred SM, Lim L-H, Madsen KH. Shift-invariant multilinear decomposition of neuroimaging data. NeuroImage 2008; 42: 1439-1450.
23. Harshman RA. PARAFAC2: mathematical and technical notes. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 1972; 22: 30-44.
24. Kiers HAL, ten Berge JMF, Bro R. PARAFAC2-part I: a direct fitting algorithm for the PARAFAC model. J. Chemometr. 1999; 13: 275-294.
25. Kruskal JB. Factor analysis and principal components: bilinear methods. In International Encyclopedia of Statistics, Kruskal WH, Tanur JM (eds). Free Press: New York, 1978; 307-330.
26. Wulfert F, Kok WT, Smilde AK. Influence of temperature on vibrational spectra and consquences for the predictive ability of multivariate models. Anal. Chem. 1998; 70: 1761-1767.
27. de Juan A, Tauler R. Comparison of three-way resolution methods for non-trilinear chemical data sets. J. Chemometr. 2001; 15: 749-772.
28. Wulfert F, Kok WT, de Noord OE, Smilde A. Correction of tempera-ture-induced spectral variation by continuous piecewise direct standardization. Anal. Chem. 2000; 72: 1639-1644.
29. Malinowski ER. Window factor analysis: theoretical derivation and application to low injection analysis data. J. Chemometr. 1992; 6: 29-40.
30. Itakura F. Minimum prediction residual principle applied to speech recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoustics Speech Signal Processing 1975; 23: 67-72.
31. Sakoe H, Chiba S. Dynamic-programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoustics Speech Signal Proces-sing 1978; 26: 43-49.
32. Beyer WA, Stein ML, Smith TF, Ulam SM. A molecular-sequence metric and evolutionary trees. Math. Biosci. 1974; 19: 9-25.
33. Wilbur WJ, Lipman DJ. Rapid similarity searches of nucleic acid and protein data banks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983; 80: 726-730.
34. Hall PAV, Dowling GR. Approximate string matching. Computing Surv. 1980; 12: 381-402.
35. Kruskal JB. An overview of sequence comparison. In Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: the Theory and Practice of Sequence Com-parison, Sankoff D, Kruskal JB (eds). Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, 1983; 1-44.
36. Hiller FS, Lieberman GJ. Introduction to Operations Research (7th edn). McGraw-Hill: New York, 2001.
37. Rabiner LR, Rosenberg AE, Levinson SE. Considerations in dynamic time warping algorithms for discrete word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoustics Speech Signal Processing 1978; 26: 575-582.
38. Myers C, Rabiner LR, Rosenberg AE. Performance tradeoffs in dynamic time warping algorithms for isolated word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoustics Speech Signal Processing 1980; 28: 622-635.
39. Pravdova V, Walczak B, Massart DL. A comparison of two algorithms for warping of analytical signals. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002; 456: 77-92.
40. Tomasi G, van-den-Berg F, Andersson C. Correlation optimized warp-ing and dynamic time warping as preprocessing methods for chro-matographic data. J. Chemometr. 2004; 18: 231-241.
41. Hong S. Warped image factor analysis. First IEEE International Work-shop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing, 2005; 121-124.
42. Geladi P, Wold S. Local principal component models, rank maps and contextuality for curve resolution and multi-way calibration inference. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1987; 2: 273-281.
43. Harman HH. Modern Factor Analysis (3rd edn). The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1976; 278-335.
44. Gower JC, Dijksterhuis GB. Procrustes Problems. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2004.
45. Law HG, Snyder CW Jr, Hattie JA, McDonald RP (eds). Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis. Praeger: New York, 1984.
46. Smilde A, Bro R, Geladi P. Multi-way Analysis: Applications in the Chemical Sciences. Wiley: West Sussex, UK, 2004.
47. MathWorks. MATLAB: Optimization Toolbox User's Guide, (ver. 3.1.1). Author: Natick, MA, 2007.
48. Kruskal JB. Rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with application to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra Appl. 1977; 18: 95-138.
49. Bro R, de Jong S. A fast non-negativity-constrained linear least squares algorithm for use in multi-way algorithms. J. Chemometr. 1997; 11: 393-401.
50. Hendricson AE, While PO. PROMAX: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Br. J. Stat. Psychol. 1964; 17: 65-70.
51. Tauler R, Smilde A, Kowalski B. Selectivity, local rank, three-way data analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemometr. 1995; 9: 31-58.
52. Donoho D, Stodden V. When does nonnegative matrix factorization give a correct decomposition into parts? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, Thrun S, Saul L, Scholkopf B (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2004; 1141-1148.
53. Wang CP, Isenhour TL. Time-warping algorithm applied to chromato-graphic peak matching gas chromatography/Fourier transform infrared/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1987; 59: 649-654.
54. Kassidas A, MacGregor JF, Taylor PA. Synchronization of batch trajec-tories using dynamic time warping. 1998; 44: 864-875.
55. Fraga CG, Prazen BJ, Synovec RE. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and chemometrics for the high-speed quanti-tative analysis of aromatic isomers in a jet fuel using the standard addition method and an objective retention time alignment algor-ithm. Anal. Chem. 2000; 72: 4154-4162.
56. Liu Z, Phillips JB. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatog-raphy using an on-column thermal disorption modulator interface. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1991; 29: 227-231.