Functional MRI comparison of passive and active movement: Possible inhibitory role of supplementary motor area

NeuroReport

Volumn 20, Issue 15, 2009, Pages 1351-1355

  Dinomais, Mickaël ^a   Minassian, Aram Ter ^b   Tuilier, Titien ^a   Delion, Matthieu ^a   Wilke, Marko ^d   N'Guyen, Sylvie ^a   Richard, Isabelle ^a,b   Aubé, Christophe ^a   Menei, Philippe ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

^b ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Inhibition; Motor cortex; Passive movement; Supplementary motor area

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE MOVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MOTION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VOLITION;

EID: 70349685417     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328330cd43     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Picard N, Strick PL. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex 1996; 6:342-353. (Pubitemid 26161547)
2. Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M. The classic supplementary motor area is formed by two independent areas. Adv Neurol 1996; 70:45-56.
3. Gerardin E, Pochon JB, Poline JB, Tremblay L, Van de Moortele PF, Levy R, et al. Distinct striatal regions support movement selection, preparation and execution. Neuroreport 2004; 15:2327-2331. (Pubitemid 39488913)
4. Nachev P, Wydell H, O'Neill K, Husain M, Kennard C. The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action. Neuroimage 2007; 36 (Suppl 2):T155-T163. (Pubitemid 46711249)
5. Toxopeus CM, de Vries PM, de Jong BM, Johnson KA, George MS, Bohning DE, et al. Cerebral activation patterns related to initiation and inhibition of hand movement. Neuroreport 2007; 18:1557-1560.
6. Kasess CH,Windischberger C, Cunnington R, Lanzenberger R, Pezawas L, Moser E. The suppressive influence of SMA on M1 in motor imagery revealed by fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2008; 40:828-837.
7. Weiller C, Juptner M, Fellows S, Rijntjes M, Leonhardt G, Kiebel S, et al. Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage 1996; 4:105-110. (Pubitemid 26337403)
8. Guzzetta A, Staudt M, Petacchi E, Ehlers J, Erb M, Wilke M, et al. Brain representation of active and passive hand movements in children. Pediatr Res 2007; 61:485-490. (Pubitemid 46569305)
9. Avenanti A, Bolognini N, Maravita A, Aglioti SM. Somatic and motor components of action simulation. Curr Biol 2007; 17:2129-2135. (Pubitemid 50013975)
10. Jarvelainen J, Schurmann M, Avikainen S, Hari R. Stronger reactivity of the human primary motor cortex during observation of live rather than video motor acts. Neuroreport 2001; 12:3493-3495. (Pubitemid 33065485)
11. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9:97-113.
12. Holmes AP, Blair RC,Watson JD, Ford I. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16:7-22. (Pubitemid 26007947)
13. Sumner P, Nachev P, Morris P, Peters AM, Jackson SR, Kennard C, Husain M. Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action. Neuron 2007; 54:697-711. (Pubitemid 46844861)
14. Simmonds DJ, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH. Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46:224-232.
15. Aron AR. The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 2007; 13:214-228.
16. Zheng D, Oka T, Bokura H, Yamaguchi S. The key locus of common response inhibition network for no-go and stop signals. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20:1434-1442.
17. Jaffard M, Longcamp M, Velay JL, Anton JL, Roth M, Nazarian B, Boulinguez P. Proactive inhibitory control of movement assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 2008; 42:1196-1206.
18. Butefisch CM, Kleiser R, Korber B, Müller K, Wittsack HJ, Hömberg V, Seitz RJ. Recruitment of contralesional motor cortex in stroke patients with recovery of hand function. Neurology 2005; 64:1067-1069. (Pubitemid 40388466)
19. Byrne RW, Russon AE. Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behav Brain Sci 1998; 21:667-684. discussion 684-721.
20. Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2001; 106:3-22. (Pubitemid 33650989)
21. Edwards MG, Humphreys GW, Castiello U. Motor facilitation following action observation: a behavioural study in prehensile action. Brain Cogn 2003; 53:495-502. (Pubitemid 37463499)
22. Peigneux P, Salmon E, van der Linden M, Garraux G, Aerts J, Delfiore G, et al. The role of lateral occipitotemporal junction and area MT/V5 in the visual analysis of upper-limb postures. Neuroimage 2000; 11 (6 Pt 1):644-655. (Pubitemid 30437657)
23. Goebel R, Khorram-Sefat D, Muckli L, Hacker H, Singer W. The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. Eur J Neurosci 1998; 10:1563-1573. (Pubitemid 28327304)