Therapeutic pancreatic endoscopy after Whipple resection requires rendezvous access

Endoscopy

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 898-901

  Kinney, T P ^a   Li, R ^a   Gupta, K ^a   Mallery, S ^a   Hunter, D ^b   Jensen, E ^a   Vickers, S ^c   Freeman, M L ^b  

^a HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SECRETIN;

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUODENOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PANCREATITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349683078     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215081     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Reid-Lombardo K M., Ramos-De l a Medina A, Thomsen K, et al. Long-term anastomotic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign diseases. J Gastrointest Surg 2007 11 1704-1711
2. van Berge Henegouwen M I., De Wit L T., Van Gulik T M., et al. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg 1997 185 18-24
3. Blondet J J., Carlson A A., Kobayashi T, et al. The role of total pancreatectomy and islet auto-transplantation for chronic pancreatitis. Surg Clin N Am 2007 87 1477-1501
4. Farrell J, Carr-Locke D, Garrido T, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant disease: indications and technical outcomes. Endoscopy 2006 38 1246-1249
5. Chahal P, Baron T H., Topazian M D., et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-Whipple patients. Endoscopy 2006 38 1241-1245
6. Mallery S, Matlock J, Freeman M L. EUS-guided rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts: report of 6 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 59 100-107
7. Sutherland D E. Current status of beta-cell replacement therapy (pancreas and islet transplantation) for treatment of diabetes mellitus. Transplant Proc 2003 35 1625-1627
8. Feitoza A B., Baron T H. Endoscopy and ERCP in the setting of previous upper GI tract surgery. Part I: reconstruction without alteration of pancreaticobiliary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 54 743-749
9. Feitoza A B., Baron T H. Endoscopy and ERCP in the setting of previous upper GI tract surgery. Part II: Postsurgical anatomy with alteration of the pancreaticobiliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 55 75-79
10. Costamagna G. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in Billroth II patients: a demanding technique for experts only? Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998 30 306-309
11. Devereaux B M., Lehman G A., Fein S, et al. Facilitation of pancreatic duct cannulation using a new synthetic porcine secretin. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 2279-2281
12. Gupta K, Mallery S, Hunter D, Freeman M L. Endoscopic ultrasound and percutaneous access for endoscopic biliary and pancreatic drainage after initially failed ERCP. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2007 7 22-37
13. Kahaleh M, Hernandez A J., Tokar J, et al. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy: analysis of its efficacy to drain inaccessible pancreatic ducts. Gastrointest Endosc 2007 65 224-230
14. Francois E, Kahaleh M, Giovannini M, et al. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 128-133