A survey of web clustering engines

ACM Computing Surveys

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Carpineto, Claudio ^a   Osiski, Stanislaw ^b   Romano, Giovanni ^a   Weiss, Dawid ^c  

^a FONDAZIONE UGO BORDONI   (Italy)

^b Carrot Search ^*

^c POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Meta search engines; Search results clustering; Text clustring; User interfaces

Indexed keywords

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS; META SEARCH ENGINES; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE; SEARCH RESULTS; SEARCH RESULTS CLUSTERING; TEXT CLUSTRING; WEB CLUSTERING;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; ENGINES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICES; SEARCH ENGINES; SURVEYS; USER INTERFACES;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 70349682438     PISSN: 03600300     EISSN: 15577341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1541880.1541884     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. ABNEY, S. 1991. Parsing by Chunks. In Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney, and C. Tenny, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 257-278.
2. ALLEN, R. B., OBRY, P., AND LITTMAN, M. 1993. An interface for navigating clustered document sets returned by queries. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Organizational Computing Systems. ACM Press, 166-171.
3. ALONSO, O. AND GERTZ, M. 2006. Clustering of search results using temporal attributes. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 597-598.
4. ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, A., BRODER, A., AND PUNERA, K. 2006. Effective and efficient classification on a searchengine model. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM Press, 208-217.
5. BADE, K. AND NURNBERGER, A. 2006. Personalized hierarchical clustering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence. IEEE, 181-187.
6. BRODER, A. 2002. A taxonomy of Web search. ACM SIGIR Forum 36, 2, 3-10.
7. CARPINETO,C.,DELLA PIETRA, A.,MIZZARO, S., ANDROMANO,G. 2006. Mobile Clustering Engine. In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3936. Springer, 155-166.
8. CARPINETO, C., MIZZARO, S., ROMANO, G., AND SNIDERO, M. 2009. Mobile information retrieval with search results clustering: Prototypes and evaluations. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tec. 60, 5, 877-895.
9. CARPINETO, C. AND ROMANO, G. 2004a. Concept Data Analysis: Theory and Applications. Wiley.
10. CARPINETO, C. AND ROMANO, G. 2004b. Exploiting the potential of concept lattices for information retrieval with CREDO. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 10, 8, 985-1013.
11. CARPINETO, C., ROMANO, G., AND GIANNINI, V. 2002. Improving retrieval feedback with multiple term-ranking function combinations. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 20, 3, 259-290.
12. CHAKRABARTI, S., DOM, B., AGRAWAL, R., AND RAGHAVAN, P. 1998. Scalable feature selection, classification and signature generation for organizing large text databases into hierarchical topic taxonomies. Inter. J. VLDB, 7, 3, 163-178.
13. CHEN, H. AND DUMAIS, S. 2000. Bringing order to the Web: Automatically categorizing search results. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 145-152.
14. CHENG, D., VEMPALA, S., KANNAN, R., AND WANG, G. 2005. A divide-and-merge methodology for clustering. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, C. Li, Ed. ACM Press, 196-205.
15. CIGARŔAN, J., PENAS, A., GONZALO, J., AND VERDEJO, F. 2005. Evaluating hierarchical clustering of search results. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE). Springer, 49-54.
16. COLE, R., EKLUND, P., AND STUMME, G. 2003. Document retrieval for email search and discovery using formal concept analysis. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17, 3, 257-280.
17. CUTTING, D. R., PEDERSEN, J. O., KARGER, D., AND TUKEY, J.W. 1992. Scatter/Gather: A cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 318-329.
18. DE LUCA, E. W. AND N̈URNBERGER, A. 2005. Supporting information retrieval on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI'05). ACM Press, New York, NY, 347-348.
19. DEERWESTER, S., DUMAIS, S. T., FURNAS, G. W., LANDAUER, T. K., AND HARSHMAN, T. K. 1990. Indexing by latent semanic analysis. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 41, 6, 391-407.
20. DI GIACOMO, E., DIDIMO, W., GRILLI, L., AND LIOTTA, G. 2007. Graph visualization techniques for Web clustering engines. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 13, 2, 294-304.
21. DING, L., FININ, T., JOSHI, A., PAN, R.,COST, R. S.,PENG, Y.,REDDIVARI, P.,DOSHI, V., AND SACHS, J. 2004. Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM Press, 652-659.
22. DOM, B. E. 2001. An information-theoretic external cluster-validity measure. Tech. rep. RJ-10219, IBM.
23. DONG, Z. 2002. Towards Web Information Clustering. Ph.D. thesis, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
24. EADES, P. AND TAMASSIA, R. 1989. Algorithms for drawing graphs: an annotated bibliography. Tech. rep. CS-89-90, Department of Computer Science, Brown University.
25. ESTIVILL-CASTRO, V. 2002. Why so many clustering algorithms: A position paper. SIGKDD Explor. 4, 1, 65-75.
26. EVERITT, B. S., LANDAU, S., AND LEESE, M. 2001. Cluster Analysis, 4th Ed. Oxford University Press.
27. FERRAGINA, P. AND GULLI, A. 2004. The Anatomy of SnakeT: A Hierarchical Clustering Engine for Web- Page Snippets. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3202. Springer, 506-508. (Pubitemid 39740431)
28. FERRAGINA, P. AND GULLI, A. 2005. A personalized search engine-based on Web-snippet hierarchical clustering. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM Press, 801-810.
29. FRED, A. L. N. AND JAIN, A. K. 2005. Combining multiple clusterings using evidence accumulation. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 6, 835-850.
30. GABRILOVICH, E. 2006. Feature generation for textual information retrieval using world knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
31. GANTER, B. AND WILLE, R. 1999. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer.
32. GERACI, F., MAGGINI, M., PELLEGRINI, M., AND SEBASTIANI, F. 2008. Cluster generation and cluster labelling for Web snippets: A fast and accurate hierarchical solution. Internet Math. 3, 4, 413-443.
33. GIANNOTTI, F., NANNI, M., PEDRESCHI, D., AND SAMARITANI, F. 2003. WebCat: Automatic categorization ofWeb search results. In Proceedings of the 11th Italian Symposium on Advanced Database Systems (SEBD), S. Flesca, S. Greco, D. Sacc̀ a, and E. Zumpano, Eds. Rubettino Editore, 507-518.
34. GREFENSTETTE, G. 1995. Comparing two language identification schemes. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (JADT'95). 263-268.
35. HAASE, P., HOTHO, A., SCHMIDT-THIEME, L., AND SURE, Y. 2005. Collaborative and usage-driven evolution of personal ontologies. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 486-499.
36. HALKIDI, M., BATISTAKIS, Y., AND VAZIRGIANNIS,M. 2001. On clustering validation techniques. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 17, 2-3, 107-145.
37. HARABAGIU, S. AND LACATUSU, F. 2005. Topic themes for multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 202-209.
38. HARTIGAN, J. A. 1975. Clustering Algorithms. Wiley.
39. HEARST, M., ELLIOTT, A., ENGLISH, J., SINHA, R., SWEARINGEN, K., AND YEE, K.-P. 2002. Finding the flow inWeb site search. Comm. ACM (Special Issue: the Consumer Side of Search) 45, 9, 42-49.
40. HEARST, M. A. 2006. Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. Comm. ACM 49, 4, 59-61.
41. HEARST, M. A. AND PEDERSEN, J. O. 1996. Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 76-84.
42. HERMAN, I., MELANCON, G., AND MARSHALL, S. M. 2000. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 6, 10, 1-21.
43. HOTHO, A., STAAB, S., AND STUMME, G. 2003. Explaining text clustering results using semantic structures. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.2838. Springer, 217-228.
44. HUSEK, D., POKORNY, J., REZANKOVA, H., AND SNASEL, V. 2006. Data clustering: From documents to the Web. In Web Data Management Practices: Emerging Techniques and Technologies, A. Vakali and G. Pallis, Eds. Baker and Taylor, 1-33.
45. JAIN, A. K. AND DUBES, R. C. 1988. Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice-Hall.
46. JAIN, A. K., MURTY, M. N., AND FLYNN, P. J. 1999. Data Clustering: A Review. ACM Comput. Surv. 31, 3, 264-323.
47. JOHNSON, B. AND SHNEIDERMAN, B. 1991. Treemaps: A space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization. IEEE Computer Society, San Diego, 284-291.
48. KAKI, M. 2005. Findex: Search result categories help users when document ranking fails. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'05). ACM Press, 131-140.
49. KANTROWITZ, M.,MOHIT, B., ANDMITTAL, V. 2000. Stemming and its effects on TFIDF ranking. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 357-359.
50. KARLSON, A. K., ROBERTSON, G. G., ROBBINS, D. C., CZERWINSKI, M., AND SMITH, G. 2006. FaThumb: A facetbased interface for mobile search. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 711-720.
51. KATIFORI, A., HALATSIS, C., LEPOURAS, G., VASSILAKIS, C., AND GIANNOPOULOU, E. 2007. Ontology visualization methods a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 39, 4, 1-43.
52. KITTLER, J., HATEF, M., DUIN, R. P., AND MATAS, J. 1998. On Combining Classifiers. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 3, 226-239.
53. KUMMAMURU, K., LOTLIKAR, R., ROY, S., SINGAL, K., AND KRISHNAPURAM, R. 2004. A hierarchical monothetic document clustering algorithm for summarization and browsing search results. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM Press, 658-665.
54. LAWRIE, D. J. AND CROFT, B.W. 2003. Generating hiearchical summaries forWeb searches. In Proceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 457-458.
55. LAWRIE, D. J., CROFT, B. W., AND ROSENBERG, A. 2001. Finding topic words for hierarchical summarization. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 349-357.
56. LEUSKI, A. 2001. Evaluating document clustering for interactive information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM Press, 33-40.
57. LEUSKI, A. AND CROFT, B. W. 1996. An evaluation of techniques for clustering search results. Tech. rep. IR-76, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
58. LIN, D. AND PANTEL, P. 2002. Concept discovery from text. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1-7.
59. LIU, T., LIU, S., CHEN, Z., AND MA, W.-Y. 2003. An evaluation on feature selection for text clustering. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning, August 21-24, T. Fawcett and N. Mishra, Eds. AAAI Press, 488-495.
60. LIU, X. AND CROFT, B. W. 2004. Cluster-based retrieval using language models. In Proceedings of the 27th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 186-193.
61. LIU, X. AND CROFT, B. W. 2006. Representing clusters for retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 671-672.
62. MAAREK, Y. S., FAGIN, R., BEN-SHAUL, I. Z., AND PELLEG, D. 2000. Ephemeral document clustering for Web applications. Tech. rep. RJ 10186, IBM Research.
63. MANBER, U. AND MYERS, G. 1993. Suffix Arrays: A new method for on-line string searches. SIAM J. Comput. 22, 5, 935-948.
64. MANNING, C. D., RAGHAVAN, P., AND SCḦUTZE, H. 2008. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
65. MANNING, C. D. AND SCHUTZE, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press.
66. MASLOWSKA, I. 2003. Phrase-based hierarchical clustering ofWeb search results. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on IR Research, (ECIR). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.2633. Springer, 555-562.
67. MENG, W., YU, C., AND LIU, K.-L. 2002. Building efficient and effective metasearch engines. ACM Comput. Surv. 34, 1, 48-89.
68. NGO, C. L. AND NGUYEN, H. S. 2004. A tolerance rough set approach to clustering Web search results. In Proceedings of the Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3202. Springer, 515-517.
69. OSDIN, R., OUNIS, I., AND WHITE, R. W. 2002. Using hierarchical clustering and summarisation approaches for Web retrieval. In Proceedings of the 11th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
70. OSI ́ NSKI, S. 2006. Improving quality of search results clustering with approximate matrix factorisations. In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3936. Springer, 167-178.
71. OSI ́ NSKI, S., STEFANOWSKI, J., AND WEISS, D. 2004. Lingo: Search results clustering algorithm based on singular value decomposition. In Proceedings of the International Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining Conference. Advances in Soft Computing. Springer, 359-368.
72. OSI ́ NSKI S. WEISS D. 2005. A concept-driven algorithm for clustering search results. IEEE Intell. Syst. 20, 3: 48-54.
73. OTTERBACHER, J., RADEV, D. R., AND KAREEM, O. 2006. News to go: hierarchical text summarization for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 589-596.
74. PANTEL, P. AND LIN, D. 2002. Document Clustering With Committees. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 199-206.
75. PERUGINI, S. AND RAMAKRISHNAN, N. 2006. Interacting with Web hierarchies. IT Profess. 8, 4, 19-28.
76. PIERRAKOS, D. AND PALIOURAS, G. 2005. Exploiting probabilistic latent information for the construction of community Web directories. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling. Springer, 89-98.
77. PORTER, M. F. 1997. An algorithm for suffix stripping. In Readings in Information Retrieval, K. S. Jones and P. Willett, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, 313-316.
78. RIGOU, M., SIRMAKESSIS, S., AND TZIMAS, G. 2006. A method for personalized clustering in data intensiveWeb applications. In Proceedings of the Joint International Workshop on Adaptivity, Personalization and the Semantic Web, (APS). ACM Press, 35-40.
79. RIVADENEIRA,W. AND BEDERSON, B. B. 2003. A study of search result clustering interfaces: Comparing textual and zoomable user interfaces. Tech. rep. HCIL-TR-2003-2036, University of Maryland.
80. ROBERTS, J. C. 1998. On encouraging multiple views for visualization. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on InfoVis. IEEE Computer Society, 8-14.
81. RODDEN, K., BASALAJ, W., SINCLAIR, D., AND WOOD, K. R. 2001. Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 190-197.
82. ROSE, D. E. AND LEVINSON, D. 2004. Understanding user goals in Web search. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM Press, 13-19.
83. SAHOO,N., CALLAN, J., KRISHNAN, R., DUNCAN, G., AND PADMAN, R. 2006. Incremental hierarchical clustering of text documents. In Proceedings of the 15th ACMInternational Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 357-366.
84. SALTON,G.,WONG, A., ANDYANG,C. S. 1975. Avector space model for automatic indexing. Comm.ACM 18, 11, 613-620.
85. SARKAR, M. AND BROWN, M. 1994. Graphical fisheye views. Comm. ACM 37, 12, 73-84.
86. SCḦUTZE, H. AND SILVERSTEIN, C. 1997. Projections for efficient document clustering. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 74-81.
87. SEBASTIANI, F. 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. 34, 1, 1-47.
88. SPILIOPOULOU, M., SCHAAL, M., MULLER, R. M., AND BRUNZEL, M. 2005. Evaluation of ontology enhancement tools. In Proceedings of the Semantics,Web and Mining, Joint InternationalWorkshops, EWMFand KDO. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.4289. Springer, 132-146.
89. STASKO, J. AND ZHANG, E. 2000. Focus+context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, space-filling hierarchy visualizations. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on InfoVis. IEEE Computer Society, 57-65.
90. STEFANOWSKI, J. AND WEISS, D. 2003a. Carrot2 and language properties in Web search results clustering. In Proceedings of the 1st International Atlantic Web Intelligence Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.2663. Springer, 240-249.
91. STEFANOWSKI, J. AND WEISS, D. 2003b. Web search results clustering in Polish: Experimental Evaluation of Carrot. In Proceedings of the International Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining Conference. Advances in Soft Computing. Springer, 209-218.
92. STEIN, B. AND MEYER ZU EISSEN, S. 2004. Topic identification: Framework and application. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Management. 353-360.
93. STEIN, B.,MEYER ZU EISSEN, S., ANDWIBROCK, F. 2003. On cluster validity and the information need of users. In Proceedings of the 3rd IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications (AIA). Springer, 216-221.
94. TAGARELLI, A. AND GRECO, S. 2006. Toward semantic XML clustering. In Proceedings of the 6th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). 188-199.
95. TEEVAN, J., ALVARADO, C., ACKERMAN, M. S., AND KARGER, D. K. 2004. The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 415-422.
96. TODA, H. AND KATAOKA, R. 2005. A search result clustering method using informatively named entities. In Proceedings of the 7th ACMInternationalWorkshop onWeb Information and Data Management (WIDM). ACM Press, 81-86.
97. TOMBROS, A., VILLA, R., AND VAN RIJSBERGEN,K. 2002. The effectiveness of query-specific hierarchic clustering in information retrieval. Inform. Proc. Manag. 38, 4, 559-582.
98. TURETKEN, O. AND SHARDA, R. 2005. Clustering-based visual interfaces for presentation of Web search results: An empirical investigation. Inform. Syst. Front. 7, 3, 273-297.
99. UKKONEN, E. 1995. On-line construction of suffix trees. Algorithmica 14, 3, 249-260.
100. VAN RIJSBERGEN, K. 1979. Information Retrieval. Butterworth-Heinemann.
101. WAGSTAFF, K., CARDIE, C., ROGERS, S., AND SCRODL, S. 2001. Constrained K-means clustering with background knowledge. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 577-584.
102. WANG, X. AND ZHAI, C. 2007. Learn from Web search logs to organize search results. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 87-94.
103. WANG, Y. AND KITSUREGAWA, M. 2002. On combining link and contents information for Web page clustering. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA). Springer, 902-913.
104. WEISS, D. 2006. Descriptive clustering as a method for exploring text collections. Ph.D. thesis, Poznan University of Technology, Pozna ́ n, Poland.
105. WILLET, P. 1988. Recent trends in hierarchic document clustering: A critical review. Inform. Proc. Manag. 24, 5, 577-597.
106. YANG, Y. AND PEDERSEN, J. O. 1997. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICMC). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 412-420.
107. YE, S.,CHUA, T.-S., ANDKEI, J.R. 2003. Querying and clusteringWeb pages about persons and organizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence. Springer, 344-350.
108. ZAMIR, O. AND ETZIONI, O. 1998. Web document clustering: A feasibility demonstration. In Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 46-54.
109. ZAMIR, O. AND ETZIONI, O. 1999. Grouper: A dynamic clustering interface to Web search results. Comput. Netw. 31, 11-16, 1361-1374.
110. ZENG, H.-J., HE, Q.-C., CHEN, Z., MA, W.-Y., AND MA, J. 2004. Learning to cluster Web search results. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 210-217.
111. ZHANG,D. ANDDONG,Y. 2004. Semantic, hierarchical, online clustering of Web search results. In Proceedings of 6th Asia-PacificWeb Conference (APWeb). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3007. Springer, 69-78.
112. ZHANG, Y.-J. AND LIU, Z.-Q. 2004. Refining Web search engine results using incremental clustering. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 19, 191-199.
113. ZHAO, H., MENG, W., WU, Z., RAGHAVAN, V., AND YU, C. 2005. Fully automatic wrapper generation for search engines. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM Press, 66-75.