A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: Outcomes, quality of life, and costs

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 250, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 631-639

  Nguyen, Ninh T ^a   Slone, Johnathan A ^a   Nguyen, Xuan Mai T ^a   Hartman, Jaimee S ^a   Hoyt, David B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BARIATRIC SURGERY; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTRIC BANDING; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBID OBESITY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SEPSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; STOMACH BYPASS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; GASTRIC BYPASS; GASTROPLASTY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY, MORBID; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 70349673328     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b92480     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Smith BR, Hinojosa MW, Reavis KM, et al. Remission of diabetes after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2008;74:948-952.
2. Rubino F, Gagner M. Potential of surgery for curing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:554-559.
3. Rubino F, Forgione A, Cummings DE, et al. The mechanism of diabetes control after gastrointestinal bypass surgery reveals a role of the proximal small intestine in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Ann Surg. 2006; 244:741-749.
4. Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K, et al. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1198-1202.
5. Nguyen NT, Silver M, Robinson M, et al. Result of a national audit of bariatric surgery performed at academic centers: a 2004 University Health System Consortium Benchmarking project. Arch Surg. 2006;141:445-449.
6. Hinojosa MW, Varela JE, Parikh D, et al. National trends in use and outcome of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:150-155.
7. Cottam DR, Atkinson J, Anderson A, et al. A case-controlled matched-pair cohort study of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and Lap-Band patients in a single US center with three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2006;16:534-540.
8. Jan JC, Hong D, Bardaro SJ, et al. Comparative study between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass: single-institution, 5-year experience in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:42-51.
9. Kim TH, Daud A, Ude AO, et al. Early US outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:202-209.
10. Biertho L, Steffen R, Ricklin T, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a comparative study of 1,200 cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:536-547.
11. Bowne WB, Julliard K, Castro AE, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass is superior to adjustable gastric band in super morbidly obese patients: a prospective, comparative analysis. Arch Surg. 2006;141:683-689.
12. Galvani C, Gorodner M, Moser F, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: ends justify the means? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:934-941.
13. Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Borelli V. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:127-133.
14. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518-526.
15. O?Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1032-1040.
16. Wadden TA, West DS, Neiberg R, et al. One-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with success. Obesity. 2009;17:713-722.
17. Favretti F, Segato G, Ashton D, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg. 2007;17: 168-175.
18. Puzziferri N, Nakonezny PA, Livingston EH, et al. Variations of weight loss following gastric bypass and gastric band. Ann Surg. 2008;248:233-242.
19. Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Lager C, et al. Who benefits from gastric banding? Obes Surg. 2007;17:1608-1613.
20. Ternovits CA, Tichansky DS, Madan AK. Band versus bypass: randomization and patients? choices and perceptions. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:6-10.
21. Ponce J, Dixon JB. 2004 ASBS consensus conference: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:310-316.
22. Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, et al. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121:885-893.
23. Sugerman HJ, Starkey JV, Birkenhauer R. A randomized prospective trial of gastric bypass versus vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity and their effects on sweets versus non-sweets eaters. Ann Surg. 1987;205:613-622.