Towards an automated testing framework to manage variability using the UML testing profile

Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Automation of Software Test, AST 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 10-17

  Lamancha, Beatriz Pérez ^a   Usaola, Macario Polo ^b   Velthius, Mario Piattini ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED TESTING; SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; TEST CASE; TEST MODELS; TESTING PROFILE; WORK FOCUS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 70349667793     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IWAST.2009.5069036     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Clements, P. and L. Northrop, Salion, Inc.: A Software Product Line Case Study. 2002, DTIC Research Report ADA412311.
2. Trigaux, J. and P. Heymans, Modelling variability requirements in Software Product Lines: A comparative survey. EPH3310300R0462/215315, FUNDP-Equipe LIEL, Namur, 2003.
3. Baker, P., et al., Model-Driven Testing: Using the UML Testing Profile. 2007: Springer.
4. OMG, Meta Object Facility 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification. 2007.
5. Bertolino, A., S. Gnesi, and A. di Pisa, PLUTO: A Test Methodology for Product Families. Software Productfamily Engineering: 5th International Workshop, PFE 2003, Siena, Italy, November 4-6, 2003: Revised Papers, 2004.
6. Dueñas, J., et al., Model driven testing in Product Family Context, in Model-Driven Architecture with Emphasis on Industrial Applications, U.o. T. CTIT Technical Report TR-CTIT-04-12, Editor. 2004, University of Twente: Enschede, the Netherlands,. p. pp 91-96.
7. Kang, S., et al., Towards a Formal Framework for Product Line Test Development. Computer and Information Technology, 2007. 7th IEEE International Conference on, 2007: p. 921-926.
8. Nebut, C., et al., Automated requirements-based generation of test cases for product families. Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 18th IEEE International Conference on, 2003: p. 263-266.
9. Olimpiew, E. and H. Gomaa, Customizable Requirements-based Test Models for Software Product Lines. International Workshop on Software Product Line Testing, 2006.
10. Reuys, A., et al., Model-based System Testing of Software Product Families. Pastor, O.; Falcao e Cunha, J.(Eds.): Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE, 2005: p. 519-534. (Pubitemid 41336125)
11. OMG, UML testing profile Version 1.0, O. M. Group, Editor. 2005.
12. Pohl, K. and A. Metzger. Variability management in software product line engineering. in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering. 2006: ACM New York, NY, USA.
13. Ziadi, T., L. Helouet, and J. Jezequel, Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines. 5th International Workshop on Software Product-Family Engineering (PFE'03, Proceedings), LNCS, 2004. 3014.
14. OMG, Unified Modeling Language, Superstructure, version 2.1.2. 2007.