Comments on the "genotype first diagnosis" controversy

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 682-

  Lacassie, Yves ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GENOTYPE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;

EID: 70349667583     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b66814     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Saul RA, Moeschler JB. How best to use CGH arrays in the clinical setting. Genet Med 2009;11:371.
2. Ledbetter DH. Response to Saul and Moeschler "How best to use CGH array in the clinical setting." Genet Med 2009;11:371-372.
3. Oski FA. Diagnostic Process. In McMillan JA, DeAngelis CD, Felgin RD, Warshaw JB, editors. Oski's pediatrics: principles and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999, Chapter 10.
4. Lacassie Y. An international multiaxial diagnostic system in clinical genetics. In: Bartsocas CS, Beighton P, editors. Dysmorphology and genetics of cardiovascular disorders. Athens, Greece: Zerbinis, 1994:28-31.
5. Lacassie Y. Use of a multiaxial diagnostic system in clinical genetics. Genet Med 2002;4:95-96.