Effects of diet on development and survivorship of narnia femorata nymphs (hemiptera: Coreidae)

Florida Entomologist

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 511-512

  de Lestang, Fae Nageon ^a   Miller, Christine W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; DIET; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; INSECT; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PLANT COMMUNITY; SURVIVORSHIP;

CACTACEAE; COREIDAE; HEMIPTERA; NARNIA FEMORATA;

EID: 70349665218     PISSN: 00154040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1653/024.092.0317     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BARANOWSKI, R. M., AND SLATER, J. A. 1986. Narnia femorata, pp. 27-29 In Coreidae of Florida (Hemi-ptera, Heteroptera), Florida Dept. of Agric. and Consumer Services, Div. Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL.
2. BENSON, L. 1982. The Cacti of the United States and Canada, Stanford University Press. Stanford, CA.
3. BRAILOVSKY, H. 1975. Distribucion de las especies de Narnia Stal (Coreidae-Coreinae-Anisoscelini) y descripcion de una nueva especie. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural 36: 169-176.
4. BRAILOVSKY, H., BARRERA, E., MAYORGA, C., AND ORTEGA LEON, G. 1994. Estadios ninfales de los coreidos del Valle de Tehuacan, Puebla (Hemiptera-Heteroptera) I. Chelinidea staffilesi, C. tabulata y Nar-nia femorata. Anales del Instituto de Biologia, UN-AM, Ser. Zool. 65(2): 241-264.
5. CALEF, G. W. 1973. Natural mortality of tadpoles in a population of Rana aurora. Ecol. 54: 741-758.
6. CASWELL, H. 1983. Phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits: demographic effects and evolutionary consequences. American Zool. 23: 35-46.
7. DOUGHTY, P., AND ROBERTS, J. D. 2003. Plasticity in age and size at metamorphosis of Crinia georgiana tadpoles: responses to variation in food levels and deteriorating conditions during development. Australian J. Zool. 51: 271-284.
8. GONZALEZ-ESPINOSA, M., AND QUINTANA-ASCENCIO, P. F. 1986. Seed predation and dispersal in a dominant desert plant: Opuntia, ants, birds and mammals. Tasks for Vegetation Science. 15: 273-284.
9. HELLGREN, E. C. 1994. Prickly-pear cactus (Opuntia spp.) and its use by wildlife, pp. 87-93 In P. Felker and J. R. Moss [eds.], Proc. 5th Annual Prickly Pear Council. Kingsville, TX.
10. JANZEN, D. H. 1986. Chihuahuan desert nopaleras: defaunated big mammal vegetation. Annual Rev. Ecol. and Systematics. 17: 595-636.
11. KINRAIDE, T. B. 1978. The ecological distribution of cholla cactus Opuntia imbricata in El-Paso County, Colorado, USA. Southwestern Naturalist. 23: 117-134.
12. MILLER, T. E. X., TYRE, A. J., AND LOUDA, S. M. 2006. Plant reproductive allocation predicts herbivore dynamics across spatial and temporal scales. American Naturalist. 168: 608-616.
13. PASTOROK, R. A. 1981. Prey vulnerability and size selection by Chaoborus larvae. Ecol. 62: 1311-1324.
14. STÅL, C. 1862. Narnia femorata. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 23: 296.