Diagnostic characteristics of given video capsule endoscopy in diagnosis of celiac disease: A meta-analysis

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 815-820

  El Matary, Wael ^a   Huynh, Hien ^a   Vandermeer, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CELIAC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VIDEO CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY;

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CELIAC DISEASE; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 70349649717     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0380     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rewers M. Epidemiology of celiac disease: What are the prevalence, incidence, and progression of celiac disease? Gastroenterology 2005;128:S47-S51.
2. Maki M, Collin P. Coeliac disease. Lancet 1997;349:1755-1759.
3. Celiac Disease Guidelines Committee of the North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005;40: 1-19.
4. El-Matary W. Wireless capsule endoscopy: Indications, limitations, and future challenges. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008;46:4-12.
5. Carlo JT, DeMarco D, Smith BA, et al. The utility of capsule endoscopy and its role for diagnosing pathology in the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Surg 2005;190:886-890.
6. Whitting P, Rutjies AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systemic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25-38.
7. Whitting P, Westwood ME, Rutjies AW, et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:9-17.
8. Agresti A, Coull B. Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Statist 1998;52:119-126.
9. Mehta CR, Patel NR, Gray R. Computing and exact confidence interval for the common odds ratio in several 2 × 2 contingency tables. J Am Statist Assoc 1985;80:969-973.
10. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Effect measures for meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG (eds): Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Metaanalysis in Context. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001.
11. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560.
12. Biagi F, Rondonotti E, Campanella J, et al. Video capsule endoscopy and histology for small-bowel mucosa evaluation: A comparison performed by blinded observers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:998-1003.
13. Hopper AD, Sidhu R, Hurlstone DP, et al. Capsule endoscopy: An alternative to duodenal biopsy for the recognition of villous atrophy in coeliac disease? Dig Liver Dis 2007;39:140-145.
14. Petroniene R, Dubcenco E, Baker JP, et al. Given capsule endoscopy in celiac disease: Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100: 685-694.
15. Rondonotti E, Spada C, Cave D, et al. Video capsule enteroscopy in the diagnosis of celiac disease: A multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1624-1631.
16. Eliakim R. Wireless capsule video endoscopy: Three years of experience. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:1238-1239. (Pubitemid 39162424)
17. Banka NH, Dhavan P, Chevale BP. Coeliac sprue-new frontiers in diagnosis and role of capsule endoscopy. J Assoc Phys Ind 2006;54:959-961.
18. Culliford A, Daly J, Diamond B, et al. The value of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with complicated celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:55-61.
19. Daum S, Wahnschaffe U, Glasenapp R, et al. Capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease. Endoscopy 2007;39:455-458.
20. Dickey W, Hughes D. Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: Implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2126-2128.