Genre and plot oriented exegesis of Gospel material: Introducing narrative criticism;Genre en plot georiënteerde narratief-kritiese eksegese van Evangeliemateriaal: Inleiding tot narratiewe kritiek

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 657-677

  Van Aarde, Andries G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349626553     PISSN: 02599422     EISSN: 20728050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Allison, D C jr 1993. The new Moses: A Matthean typology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
2. Alter R 1981. The art of biblical narrative. New York: Basic books
3. Anderegg, J 1977. Fiktion und Kommunikation: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Prosa. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
4. Bakhtin, M M 1999. Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics, ed by C Emerson. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
5. Bal, M 1991. In story-telling: Essays in narratology. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge
6. Berger, P 1961. The noise of solemn assemblies: Christian commitment and the religious establishment in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
7. Blomberg, C I 1990. Interpreting the parables. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity
8. Bultmann, R [1956] 1967. Das Evangelium des Johannes. (Ergänzungsheft 1967). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
9. th edition. New York: Dover
10. th Annual Meeting, University of Durham, August 6-10, 2002
11. Chatelion Counet, P 2005. Introduction, in Chatelion Counet, P & Berges, U 2005, One text, a thousand methods: Studies in memory of Sjef van Tilborg, 1-18. Boston, MA: Brill Academic Publishers
12. Chatman, S 1978. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
13. Culpepper, R A 1983. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A study in literary design. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
14. Danow, D K 1987. Lotman and Uspensky. A perfusion of models. Semiotica 64, 343-357
15. De Kock, E L & Cilliers, L 1991. Aristoteles poetika: Vertaling en uitleg van betekenis. Johannesburg: Perskor
16. Donaldson, T L 1985. Jesus on the mountain: A study in Matthean theology. Sheffield: JSOT. (JSNTS 8.)
17. Doty, W G 1972. The concept of genre in literary analysis, in McGouchy, L C (ed), SBL Proceedings, Vol 2: Book of Seminar Papers, 413-448. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
18. Elliott, J H 1993. What is social-scientific criticism? Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
19. Ellis, I P 1967-1968. But some doubted. NTS 14, 574-580
20. Fortna, R T 1970. The Gospel of Signs: The chief narrative source underlying the Fourth Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
21. Fortna, R T 1988. The Fourth Gospel and its predecessor: From narrative source to present Gospel. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
22. Frei, H W 1974. The eclipse of biblical narrative: A study in eighteen and nineteenth century hermeneutics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
23. Funk, R W 1988. The poetics of biblical narrative. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge
24. Genette, G 1980. Narrative discourse: An essay in method, tr by J E Lewin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
25. Hauerwas, S & Jones, L G J (eds) 1989. Why narrative? Readings in narrative theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans
26. Kesich, V 1972. The gospel image of Christ: The church and modern criticism. New York: St Vladimir's Seminar Papers
27. Kingsbury, J D 1997. The plot of Matthew's story, in Kingsbury, J D (ed), Gospel interpretation: Narrative-critical and social-scientific approaches, 16-26. Philadelphia, PA: Trinity Press International
28. Lategan, B C 1982. Inleiding tot de uitlegging van het Nieuwe Testament, in Klijn, A F J (red), Inleiding tot de studie van het Nieuwe testament, 47-70. Kampen: Kok
29. Legrand, L 2000. The Bible on culture: Belonging or dissenting? Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books
30. Lindars, B 1971. Behind the Fourth Gospel. London: SPCK
31. Lindars, B 1972. The Gospel of John. London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott
32. Lotman, J M 1975. Point of view in a text. New Literary History 6, 339-352
33. MacIntyre, A C [1981] 1985. After virtue: A study in moral theory, 2nd edition. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press
34. Mack, B L 1990. Rhetoric and the New Testament. Minneapolis, MN:Fortress. (NT Series. Guides to Biblical Scholarship.)
35. Malbon, E S 1983. Fallible followers: Women and men in the Gospel of Mark. Semeia 28, 29-48
36. Martyn, J L 1986. Source criticism and Religionsgeschichte in the Fourth Gospel, in Ashton, J (ed), The interpretation of John, 99-121. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
37. Midbank, J 1990. Theology and social theory: Beyond secular reason. Oxford: Blackwell. (Signposts in Theology.)
38. Moore, S D 1989. Literary criticism and the gospels: The theoretical challenge. New Haven, MA: Yale University Press
39. Patterson, S J 1998. The God of Jesus: The historical Jesus & the search for meaning. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International
40. Patte, D 1976. What is structural exegesis? Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
41. Patte, D 1981a. Elements of a semiotic of didactic discourse: Analysis of 1 Thessalonians. Documents de Travail Series, of the Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica. Urbino: University of Urbino Press
42. Patte, D 1981b. "Elements of a semiotic of didactic discourse": Method for a structural exegesis of didactic discourses. Semeia 26, 85-129
43. Patte, D 1983. Method for a structural exegesis of didactic discourses: Analysis of 1 Thessalonians, in Narrative and discourse in structural exegesis: John 6 and 1 Thessalonians. Semeia 26, 85-129
44. Patte, D 1987. The Gospel according to Matthew: A structural commentary on Matthew's faith. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
45. Patte, D 1990. The religious dimensions of biblical texts: Greimas's structural semiotics and biblical exegesis. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press. (Semeia Studies Series.)
46. Patte, D & Patte A 1978. Structural exegesis: From theory to practice. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
47. Pelser, G M M 1983. Die aktante-model van A J Greimas, in Van Aarde, A G (red), Interpretasiemodelle in Evangelienavorsing, 35-57. Universiteit van Pretoria, Departement Nuwe-Testamentiese Wetenskap (Afd A)
48. Petersen, N R 1978. "Point of view" in Mark's narrative. Semeia 12, 97-121
49. Petersen, N R 1980. When is the end not the end? Litery reflections on the ending of Mark's narrative. Interp 34, 151-166
50. Petersen, N R 1985. Rediscovering Paul: Philemon and the sociology of Paul's narrative world. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress
51. Powell, M A 1990. What is narrative criticism? Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
52. Resseguie, J L 1982. Point of view in the central section of Luke (9:51-19:44). Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 25, 41-47
53. Resseguie, J L 2005. Narrative criticism of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic
54. Rhoads, D 1982. Narrative criticism and the Gospel of Mark. JAAR 50, 411-434
55. [repr in Rhoads, D 2004. Reading Mark: Engaging the Gospel, chapter 1. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.]
56. Rhoads, D & Dewey, J & and Mitchie, D 1999. Mark as story: An introduction to the narrative of a gospel. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
57. Ricoeur, P 1984. Time and narrative, vol I. Chicago: Chigago University Press
58. Ricoeur, P 1985. Time and narrative, vol 2. Chicago: Chigago University Press
59. Ricoeur, P 1988. Time and narrative, vol 3. Chicago: Chigago University Press
60. Ricoeur, P 1995. Figuring the sacred: Religion, narrative and imagination, tr by D Pellauer and ed by M I Wallace. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
61. Scott, B B 1989. Hear then the parable: A commentary on the parables of Jesus. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
62. Scottroff, L 2006. The parables of Jesus, tr by L M Maloney. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
63. Smarr, J L 1993. Introduction, in Smarr, J L (ed), Historical critcism and the challenge of theory, 1-24. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
64. Stiller, B C 2005. Preaching parables to postmoderns. Mineapolis, MN: Fortress. (Fortress Resources for Preaching.)
65. Tatum, W B [1982] 1999. In quest of Jesus. Revised and enlarged edition. Nashville, TN: Abingdon
66. Tolmie, D F 1999. Narratology and biblical narratives: A practical guide. San Francisco, CA: International Scholars Publications
67. Thiselton, A 1978. Structuralism and biblical studies: Method or ideology? Expository Times 89, 329-335
68. Thompson, C 1984. Bakhtin's theory of genre. Studies in Twentieth Century Literature 9(1), 29-40
69. Thomas, A & Van Aarde, A G 1998. Samaria as belangeruimte in Lukas-Handelinge. HTS 54(3&4), 736-788
70. Uspensky, B 1973. A poetics of composition: The structure of the artistic text and typology of a compositional form, tr by V Zavarin and S Wittig. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley University Press
71. Van Aarde, A G 1982a. Matthew's portrayal of the disciples and the structure of Matthew 13:53-17:27. Neot 16, 21-34
72. Van Aarde, A G 1982b. God-met-ons: Dié teologiese perspektief van die Matteusevangelie. DD-proefskrif, Universiteit van Pretoria
73. Van Aarde, A G 1983. Die vertellersperspektief-analise: 'n Literatuurteoretiese benadering in die eksegese van die Evangelies, in Van Aarde, A G (red), Interpretasiemodelle in Evangelienavorsing, 58-83. Universiteit van Pretoria, Departement Nuwe-Testamentiese Wetenskap (Afd A)
74. Van Aarde, A G 1985. Die outeurskapsvraag van die Johannesevangelie met die oog op interpretasie of resepsie. Skrif & Kerk 6, 45-62
75. Van Aarde, A G 2005. Resolving communication disturbances in Luke 12:35-48 through narratology, in Chatelion Counet, P & Berges, U 2005, One text, a thousand methods: Studies in memory of Sjef van Tilborg, 161-178. Boston, MA: Brill Academic Publishers
76. Van Aarde, A G 2006a. Inleiding tot die sosiaal-wetenskaplike kritiek van Nuwe-Testamentiese tekste. Beplande artikel vir HTS
77. Van Aarde, A G 2006b. Hoe om in te kom en hoe om binne te bly - die "groot sendingopdrag" aan die kerk vandag volgens Matteus 28:16-20. HTS 62(1), 103-122
78. Van Zyl, S & Van Aarde, A G 1997. Die Lukaanse Jesusbeeld: In dialoog met Wilhelm Bousset se "Kyrios Christos". HTS 53(1&2), 185-208
79. Vorster, W S 1977. 'n Ou boek in 'n nuwe wêreld: Gedagtes rondom die interpretasie van die Nuwe Testament. Inaugural Lecture. Pretoria: University of South Africa. (Miscellanea 10.)
80. Vorster, W S 1980. Die evangelie volgens Markus: Inleiding en teologie, in Du Toit, A B (red), Handleiding by die Nuwe testament, IV: Die Sinoptiese Evangelies en Handelinge, 109-155. Pretoria: NG Kerkboekhandel
81. Vorster, W S 1982. De structuuranalyse, in Klijn, A F J (red), Inleiding tot de studie van het Nieuwe testament, 127-152. Kampen: Kok
82. Waetjen, H C 2005. The Gospel of the beloved disciple: A work in two editions. New York: T & T Clark
83. Webb, G 2006. Bakhtin's poetics and the Gospels: Genre-memory and its possible application to the Gospel of Mark. The Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin 35(2), 38-42
84. Wright, N T 1992. Christian origins and the question of God, vol 1: The New Testament and the people of God. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress