Myth 3: A family of identification myths: Your sample must be the same as the population. There is a "Silver Bullet" in identification. There must be "Winners" and "Losers" in identification and programming

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 239-241

  Callahan, Carolyn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349618901     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986209346826     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Gardner, H. (1983/1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
2. Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3. Passow, A.H. (1982). Differentiated curricula for the gifted/ talented. In Curricula for the gifted: Selected proceedings for the First National Conference on Curricula for the Gifted/ Talented (pp. 4-20). Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
4. Robinson, N.M. (2003). Two wrongs do not make a right: Sacrificing the needs of gifted students does not solve society's unsolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 252-273.
5. Treffinger, D.J. (1982). Your sample must be the same as your population. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 15-16.
6. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: Author.