Love thy neighbour: Family reunification and the rights of insiders

European Journal of Migration and Law

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 235-252

  De Hart, Betty ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

8 ECHR; Citizenship; Family reunification; Gender; Right to family life

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349616990     PISSN: 1388364X     EISSN: 15718166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/138836409X12469435402774     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abdulaziz, 28 May 1985, 9214/80, 9473/81, 9474/81.
2. J.H. Carens, Who Should Get in? The Ethics of Immigration Admissions, Ethics and International Affairs, 17 (1) (2003) 95-110.
3. Ibid.J.H. Carens, Who Should Get in The Ethics of Immigration Admissions, Ethics and International Affairs, 17 (1) (2003), pp. 95-96.
4. A.H.J. Swart, Artikel 8 van het Europees verdrag tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens, Han- delingen Nederlandse Juristen Vereniging 120(1), Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1990, p. 188.
5. J. Bhabha, and S. Shutter, Women's Movement, Women under Immigration, Nationality and Refugee Law, Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books, 1994, p. 58.
6. Rodrigues Da Silva Hoogkamer, 31 January 2006, 50435/99.
7. In Boultif, the couple put forward the argument that at the time it was dangerous for Mrs Boultif to live in Algeria, because of the Islamist attacks on Western women. The Court ignored the argument. Boultif, 2 August 2001, 54273/00.
8. Anuscheh Farahat, The Exclusiveness of Inclusion: On the Boundaries of a Human Rights-Based Approach in Migration Law, European Journal of Migration and Law 11 (3) (2009), 253-269, this issue.
9. Sen, 21 December 2001,31465/96.
10. Useimov, 11 April 2006, 61292/00.
11. Konstatinov, 26 April 2007, 16351/03.
12. Rodrigues Da Silva Hoogkamer, 31 January 2006, 50435/99.
13. B. de Hart, The Right to Domicile of Women with a Migrant Partner in European Immigration Law, in S. van Walsum and T. Spijkerboer, Women and Immigration Law. New Variations on Classical Feminist Themes, New York: Routledge Cavendish, 2007, pp. 142-162.
14. Boultif, 2 August 2001, 54273/00.
15. Onur, 17 February 2009, 27319/07.
16. See also Kayo, 28 June 2007, 31753/02.
17. Yildiz, 31 October 2002, 37295/97.
18. Amrollahi, 11 July 2002, 56811/00.
19. Sezen, 31 January 2006, 5015/99.
20. Amaro, 5 October 2004, 6914/02. It should be noted that Mrs Boumlal had dual nationality, because of Morocco's refusal to allow renunciation of nationality.
21. Pieter Boeles in annotation to Kaya, Jurisprudentie Vreemdelingenrecht 2007/437.
22. Üner, 18 October 2006, 46410/99.
23. De Hart 2007, pp. 148-150.
24. Abdukziz, 28 May 1985, 9214/80, 9473/81, 9474/81.
25. P. Bodes, Nederland en toekomstig Europees gezinsherenigingsrecht, Migrantenrecht, 2000, pp. 178-187;
26. A. Walter, Reverse Discrimination and Family Reunification, Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2008, p. 21.