A study on linear plant compositions' functionality, visuality and species diversity assessment in Trabzon City;Trabzon kentindeki çizgisel bitki: Kompozisyonlarının tür çeşitliliǧi ile ışlevsel ve görsel deǧerleri üzerine bir araştırma

Ekoloji

Volumn 19, Issue 72, 2009, Pages 65-73

  Acar, Cengiz ^a   Güneroǧlu, Nilgün Ayhan ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Linear plant composition; Semantic differential; Visual quality

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; GREENSPACE; HABITAT CORRIDOR; HABITAT STRUCTURE; PUBLIC SPACE; RURAL LANDSCAPE; SHRUB; SPECIES DIVERSITY; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; TRABZON [TRABZON (PRV)]; TRABZON [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

HYDRANGEA; HYDRANGEA MACROPHYLLA; LIGUSTRUM; LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM; PLATYCLADUS ORIENTALIS;

EID: 70349615452     PISSN: 13001361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5053/ekoloji.2009.728     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Acar C, Saki{dotless}ci{dotless} C (2008) Assessing landscape perception of urban rocky habitats. Building and Environment 43, 1153-1170.
2. Acar C, Demirbaş E, Dinçer P, Acar H (2003) Anlamsal farkli{dotless}laşi{dotless}m tekniǧinin bitki kompozisyonu örneklerinde deǧerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 1, 15-28.
3. Aude E, Tybirk K, Michelsen A, Ejrnaes R, Hald A, Mark S (2004) Conservation value of the herbaceous vegetation in hedgerows - does organic farming make a difference? Biological Conservation 118, 467-478.
4. Ayhan N (2007) Canli{dotless} çizgisel eleman ve kompozisyonlari{dotless}n peyzaj mimarli{dotless}ǧi{dotless}nda kullani{dotless}mi{dotless}; Trabzon kent örneǧi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
5. Baudry J, Bunce R, Burel F (2000) Hedgerows: an international perspective on their origin, function and management. Journal of Environmental Management 60, 7-22.
6. Barr C, Gillespie M (2000) Estimating hedgerow length and pattern characteristics in Great Britain using Countryside Survey data. Journal of Environmental Management 60, 23-32.
7. Boutin C, Jobin B, Belanger L, Choiniere L (2002) Plant diversity in three types of hedgerows adjacent to cropfields. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 1-25.
8. Busck A (2003) Hedgerow planting analysed as a social system-interaction between farmers and other actors in Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management 68, 161-171.
9. Cherrill A, Mercer C, Mcclean C, Tudor G (2001) Assessing the Floristic Diversity of Hedge Networks: A landscape perspective. Landscape Research 26, 55-64.
10. Daniel T (2001) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 267-281.
11. Deckers B, Hermy M, Muys B (2004a) Factors affecting plant species composition of hedgerows: relative importance and hierarchy. Acta Oecologica 26, 23-37.
12. Deckers B, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Muys B (2004b) Differential environmental response of plant functional types in hedgerow habitats. Basic and Applied Ecology 5, 551-566.
13. Faiers A, Bailey A (2004) Evaluating canalside hedgerows to determine future interventions. Journal of Environmental Management 10, 301-309.
14. Garbutt R, Sparks T (2002) Changes in the botanical diversity of a species rich ancient hedgerow between two surveys. Biological Conservation 106, 273-278.
15. Hitchmough J (1994) The management of woody plants other than trees in the urban landscape. Urban Landscape Management 7, 301-329.
16. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Kaptanoǧlu A (2006) Peyzaj deǧerlendirmesinde görsel canlandi{dotless}rma tekniklerinin kullani{dotless}ci{dotless} tercihlerine etkileri. Doktora Tezi, I{dotless}stanbul Üniversitesi, I{dotless}stanbul.
18. Kelkit A (2002) Çanakkale kenti açi{dotless}k-yeşil alanlarda kullani{dotless}lan bitki materyali üzerinde bir araşti{dotless}rma. Ekoloji 10, 17-21.
19. Kendal D, Williams K., Armstrong L (2008) Preference for and performance of some Australian native plants grown as hedges. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7, 93-106.
20. Levin G (2006) Dynamics of Danish Agricultural Landscape and The Role of Organic Farming. National Environmental Research Institute Ministry of the Environment., Denmark.
21. McCluskey A, Lovarini M (2005) Providing education on evidence-based practice improved knowledge but did not change behaviour: a before and after study. BMC Medical Education 5, 40-52.
22. McCollin D (2000) Hedgerow policy and protection-changing paradigms and the conservation ethic. Journal of Environmental Management 60, 3-6.
23. Oreszczyn S (2000) A systems approach to the research of people's relationships with English hedgerows. Landscape and Urban Planning 50, 107-117.
24. Oreszczyn S, Lane A (2000) The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management. Journal of Environmental Management 60, 101-118.
25. Oreszczyn S, Lane A (2001) Hedgerows of different cultures: implications from a Canadian and English cross-cultural study. In: Barr C, Petit S (eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Annual IALE (UKL) Conference, University of Birmingham 5th-8th September 2001, IALE, UK, 43-52.
26. Osgood C (1975) Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
27. Rich T, Clements D, Lewis J, Moore L (2000) A comparison of four methods used to survey hedgerows: The Cardiff Hedgerow Survey 1998. Journal of Environmental Management 60, 91-100.
28. Robinson N (2004) The Planting Design Handbook, Ashgate Publishing, England.
29. Silah M (2002) Sanayi işletmelerinde önemli ve çaǧdaş gereksinim: Süreç dani{dotless}şmanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless} uygulamalari{dotless}. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 1, 143-168.
30. Tahvanainen L, Tyrvainen L, Ihalainene M, Vuorela N, Kolehmainen O (2001) Forest management and public perceptions - visual versus verbal information. Landscape and Urban Planning 53, 53-70.
31. Tyrvainen L, Tavhanainen L (1999) Using computer graphics for assessing the scenic value of large-scale rural landscape. Forthcoming Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14, 282-288.