Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension

International Journal of Listening

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 14-31

  Bonk, William J ^a  

^a KANDA UNIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349608405     PISSN: 10904018     EISSN: 1932586X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alderson, J. C., 1984. “ Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? ”. In Reading in a foreign language, Edited by: Alderson, J. C., and Urquhart, A. H., 1–24. New York: Longman.
2. Bernhardt, E., and Kamil, M., 1995. Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16 (1): 15–34.
3. Bonk, W., 1996. Lexical knowledge and listening: What percentage of text-lexis must be known to ensure comprehension?, University of Hawai'i. Unpublished manuscript
4. Bossers, B., 1991. “ On thresholds, ceilings and short-circuits: The relation between L1 reading, L2 reading and L2 knowledge ”. In AILA Review 8 Edited by: Hulstijn, J. H., and Matter, J. F., 45–60.
5. Brisbois, J., 1992. Do first language writing and second language reading equal second language reading comprehension? An assessment dilemma, Ohio State University. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation
6. Carrel, P. L., 1991. Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency?. Applied Linguistics, 12: 159–179.
7. Clarke, M. A., 1979. Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29: 121–150.
8. Cziko, G., 1980. Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first- and second-language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30: 101–116.
9. Feyten, C., 1991. The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The Modem Language Journal, 75 (2): 173–180.
10. Frauenfelder, U., and Tyler, L., 1987. The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction. Cognition, 25: 1–20.
11. Glenn, E., Emmert, P., and Emmert, V., 1995. A scale for measuring listenability: The factors that determine listening ease and difficulty. International Journal of Listening, 9: 44–61.
12. Hayashi, T., 1991. Interactive processing of words in connected speech in L1 and L2. IRAL, 29 (2): 151–160.
13. Haycock, K., Roth, J., and Gagnon, J., 1993. Statview 4.01 [Computer software], Calabasas, CA: Abacus Concepts, Inc.
14. Hirai, A., 1999. The relationship between listening and reading rates of Japanese EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (3): 367–384.
15. Jackson, M. D., and McClelland, J. L., 1979. Processing determinants of reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108: 151–181.
16. Just, M. A., and Carpenter, P., 1987. The psychology of reading and language comprehension, Newton, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Kelly, P., 1991. Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. IRAL, 29 (2): 135–149.
18. Laufer, B., 1989. “ What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? ”. In Special Language, Edited by: Lauren, C., and Nordman, M., 316–323. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
19. Laufer, B., 1992. “ How much lexis in necessary for reading comprehension? ”. In Vocabulary and applied linguistics, Edited by: Arnaud, P., and Béjoint, H., 126–132. London: Macmillan.
20. Laufer, B., and Sim, D., 1985a. Taking the easy way out: Non-use and misuse of clues in EFL reading. English Teaching Forum, 23 (2): 7–10. 22
21. Laufer, B., and Sim, D., 1985b. Measuring and explaining the threshold needed for English for academic purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals, 18: 405–413.
22. Lund, R. J., 1991. A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 75 (2): 196–204.
23. McCarthy, M., 1990. “ Vocabulary ”. In Language teaching: A scheme for teacher education, Edited by: Candlin, C., and Widdowson, H., Oxford: Oxford University Press. the series
24. McKenzie, N., and Clark, A., 1995. The all-in-one concept: How much must listening research include?. International Journal of Listening, 9: 29–43.
25. Nation, I. S. P., 1990. Teaching and learning vocabulary, New York: Newbury House.
26. Nissan, S., DeVincenzi, F., and Tang, K. L., 1996. An analysis of factors affecting the difficulty of dialogue items in TOEFL listening comprehension, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (Research Report RR-95–37)
27. Rhodes, S., Watson, K., and Barker, L., 1990. Listening assessment: Trends and influencing factors in the 1980s. International Journal of Listening, 4: 62–82.
28. Samuels, S. J., 1987. “ Factors that influence reading and listening comprehension ”. In Comprehending oral and written language, Edited by: Horowitz, R., and Samuels, S. J., 295–325. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Sticht, T. G., 1972. “ Learning by listening ”. In Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge, Edited by: Freedle, R. O., and Carroll, J. N., 285–314. Washington, D.C.: V. H. Winston.
30. Swinney, D., 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14: 645–660.
31. Taillefer, G., 1996. L2 reading ability: Further insight into the short-circuit hypothesis. The Modem Language Journal, 80 (4): 461–477.
32. Thompson, I., and Rubin, J., 1996. Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension?. Foreign Language Annals, 29 (3): 331–342.
33. Villaume, W., and Weaver, J., 1996. A factorial approach to establishing reliable listening measures from the WBLT and KCLT: Full information factor analysis of dichotomous data. International Journal of Listening, 10: 1–20.
34. Watson, K. W., and Barker, L. L., 1987. Watson-Barker listening test: Facilitation guide, Form A and Form B, video version, New Orleans, LA: SPECTRA, Inc.
35. Witkin, B. R., 1990. Listening theory and research: The state of the art. International Journal of Listening, 4: 7–32.