Modeling tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) habitat and climate change effects in the Northwestern United States

Invasive Plant Science and Management

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 200-215

  Kerns, Becky K ^a   Naylor, Bridgett J ^a   Buonopane, Michelle ^b   Parks, Catherine G ^a   Rogers, Brendan ^c  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomapper; Climate envelope modeling; Ecological Niche factor Analysis; Exotic plants; Saltcedar; Species distribution model

Indexed keywords

TAMARICACEAE; TAMARIX;

EID: 70349606689     PISSN: 19397291     EISSN: 1939747X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/IPSM-08-120.1     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bailey, J. K., J. A. Schweitzer, and T. G. Whitham. 2001. Salt cedar negatively affects biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Wetlands 21:442-447.
2. Baum, B. R. 1978. The Genus Tamarix. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. 209 p.
3. Birken, A. S. and D. J. Cooper. 2006. Processes of Tamarix invasion and floodplain development along the lower Green River, Utah. Ecol. Appl. 16:1103-1120.
4. Bony, S., R. Colman, and T. Fichefet, et al. (2007). Climate models and their evaluation. Working Group I Report: The physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Fourth Assessment Report.
5. Bradley, B. A., M. Oppenheimer, and D. S. Wilcove. 2009. Climate change and plant invasions: restoration opportunities ahead? Glob. Change Biol. Doi 10.111/j.1365-2486.2008.01824.x.
6. Braunisch, V., K. Bollmann, R. Graf, and A. Hirzel. 2008. Living on the edge-modeling habitat suitability for species at the edge of their fundamental niche. Ecol. Model. 214:153-167.
7. Cleverly, J., S. Smith, A. Sala, and D. Devitt. 1997. Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissima in a Mohave Desert floodplain: the role of drought. Oecologia 111:12-18.
8. Cohn, J. P. 2005. Tiff over tamarisk: can a nuisance be nice, too? Bioscience 55:648-654.
9. Daly, C., M. Halbleib, J. I. Smith, W. P. Gibson, M. K. Doggett, G. H. Taylor, J. Curtis, and P. A. Pasteris. 2008. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int. J. Climatol. Doi 10.1002/joc.1688.
10. Daly, C., J. I. Smith, and R. McKane. 2007. High-resolution spatial modeling of daily weather elements for a catchment in the Oregon Cascade Mountains, United States. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 46:1565-1586.
11. Davis, A. J., L. S. Jenkinson, J. L. Lawton, B. Shorrocks, and S. Wood. 1998. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783-786.
12. DiTomaso, J. M. 1998. Impact, biology, and ecology of salt-cedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol. 12:326-336.
13. Friedman, J. M., G. T. Auble, P. B. Shafroth, M. L. Scott, M. F. Merigliano, M. D. Freehling, and E. R. Griffin. 2005. Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA. Biol. Invasions 7:747-751.
14. Friedman, J. M., J. E. Roelle, J. F. Gaskin, and J. Roth. 2007. Has Tamarix undergone rapid evolution of latitudinal variation in cold hardiness? San Jose, CA: Ecological Society of America Meeting. [Abstract]
15. Gaskin, J. F. and B. A. Schaal. 2002. Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U.S. invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11,256-11,259.
16. Glenn, E. P. 2005. Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western U.S. riparian zones. J. Arid Environ. 61:419-446.
17. Glenn, E. P. and P. L. Nagler. 2005. Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western U.S. riparian zones. J. Arid Environ. 61:419-446.
18. Guisan, A. and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135:147-186.
19. Hampe, A. 2004. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13:469-476.
20. Hijmans, R. J. and C. H. Graham. 2006. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Glob. Change Biol. 12:2272-2281.
21. Hirzel, A. H. and R. Arlettaz. 2003. Modelling habitat suitability for complex species distributions by the environmental-distance geometric mean. Env. Manag. 32:614-623.
22. Hirzel, A. H., J. Hausser, D. Chessel, and N. Perrin. 2002. Ecological- niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat suitability maps without absence data? Ecol. 83:2027-2036.
23. Hirzel, A. H., J. Hausser, and N. Perrin. 2004. Biomapper Users Manuel. University of Lausanne: Lab of Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution.
24. Hirzel, A. H., G. Le Lay, V. Helfer, C. Randin, and A. Guisan. 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presence. Ecol. Model. 199:142-152.
25. Horton, J. and J. Clark. 2001. Water table decline alters growth and survival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. For. Ecol. Manag. 140:239-247.
26. Horton, J., T. Kolb, and S. Hart. 2001. Responses of riparian trees to interannual variation in ground water depth in a semi-arid river basin. Plant Cell. Environ. 24:293-304.
27. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Pages 415-427 in Cold Spring Harbour Symposium on Quantitative Biology. New York: Long Island Biological Association.
28. [IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2000. Special Report on Emission Scenarios. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.htm. Accessed: June 4, 2009.
29. IPCC. 2007. Summary for Policymakers. Fourth Assessment Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4-syr-spm.pdf. Accessed: June 4, 2009.
30. Kennedy, T. A., J. C. Finlay, and S. E. Hobbie. 2005. Eradication of invasive Tamarix ramosissima along a desert stream increases native fish density. Ecol. Appl. 15:2072-2083.
31. Ladenburger, C. G., A. L. Hild, D. J. Kazmer, and L. C. Munn. 2006. Soil salinity patterns in Tamarix invasions in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA. J. Arid. Environ. 65:111-128.
32. Lesica, P. and T. H. DeLuca. 2004. Is tamarisk allelopathic? Plant Soil 267:357-365.
33. Lesica, P. and S. Miles. 2001. Tamarisk growth at the northern margin of its naturalized range in Montana, USA. Wetlands 21:240-246.
34. Lite, S. J. and J. C. Stromberg. 2005. Surface water and ground-water thresholds for maintaining Populus-Salix forests, San Pedro River, Arizona. Biol. Conserv. 125:153-167.
35. Martinez-Meyer, E. 2005. Climate change and biodiversity: some considerations in forecasting shifts in species' potential distributions. Biodivers. Inf. 2:42-55.
36. McKenney, D. W., J. H. Pedlar, K. Lawrence, K. Campbell, and M. K. Hutchinson. 2007. Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. BioScience 57:939-948.
37. Meehl, G. A., C. Covey, T. Delworth, M. Latif, B. McAvaney, J. F. B. Mitchell, R. J. Stouffer, and K. E. Taylor. 2007. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88:1383-1394.
38. Morisette, J. T., C. S. Jarnevich, A. Ullah, W. J. Cai, J. A. Pedelty, J. E. Gentle, T. J. Stohlgren, and J. L. Schnase. 2006. A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4:11-17.
39. [NAIP] National Agriculture Imagery Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2004-2006. Request for Aerial Photography. http:// www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA-File/fsa0441.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2007.
40. Neilson, R. P., L. F. Pitelka, A. M. Solomon, R. Nathan, G. F. Midgley, J. M. V. Fragoso, H. Lischke, and K. Thompson. 2005. Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. BioScience 55:749-759.
41. Owen, J. C., M. K. Sogge, and M. D. Kern. 2005. Habitat and sex differences in physiological condition of breeding Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus). Auk 122:261-1270.
42. Pearce, C. M. and D. G. Smith. 2003. Tamarisk: distribution, abundance, and dispersal mechanisms, northern Montana, USA. Wetlands 23:215-228.
43. Pearson, R. G. and T. P. Dawson. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12:361-371.
44. Pearson, R. G. and T. P. Dawson. 2004. Bioclimate envelope models:what they detect and what they hide-response to Hampe (2004). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13:471-473.
45. Pratt, R. B. and R. A. Black. 2006. Do invasive trees have a hydraulic advantage over native trees? Biol. Invasions 8:1331-1341.
46. Rehfeldt, G., N. L. Crookston, M. V. Warwell, and J. S. Evans. 2006. Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167:1123-1150.
47. Rehfeldt, G., D. E. Ferguson, and N. L. Crookston. 2008. Quantifying the abundance of co-occurring conifers along inland northwest (USA) climate gradients. Ecology 89:2127-2139.
48. Roe, G. H. and M. B. Baker. 2007. Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318:629-632.
49. Sexton, J. P., J. K. McKay, and A. Sala. 2002. Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow tamarisk to invade cold climates in North America. Ecol. Appl. 12:1652-1660.
50. Sexton, J. P., A. Sala, and K. Murray. 2006. Occurrence, persistence, and expansion of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) populations in the great plains of Montana. West. N. Am. Nat. 66:1-11.
51. Shafroth, P. B., G. T. Auble, J. C. Stromberg, and D. T. Patten. 1998. Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18:577-590.
52. Shafroth, P. B., V. B. Beauchamp, M. K. Briggs, K. Lair, M. L. Scott, and A. A. Sher. 2008. Planning riparian restoration in the context of Tamarix control in the western United States. Restor. Ecol. 16:97-112.
53. Shafroth, P. B., J. R. Cleverly, T. L. Dudley, J. P. Taylor, C. Van Riper, E. P. Weeks, and J. N. Stuart. 2005. Control of Tamarix in the western United States: implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration. Environ. Manag. 35:231-246.
54. Stein, B. A. and S. R. Flack. 1996. America's Least Wanted: Alien Species Invasions of U.S. Ecosystems. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
55. Stromberg, J. and M. Chew. 2002. Foreign visitors in riparian corridors of the American Southwest: is xenophobia justified? Pages 195-219 in B. Tellman, ed. Invasive exotic species in the Sonoran region. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
56. Thomas, C. D., A. Cameron, and R. E. Green, et al. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145-148.
57. VEMAP Members. 1995. Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 9:407-437.
58. Zavaleta, E. 2000a. The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub. Ambio 29:462-467.
59. Zavaleta, E. 2000b. Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. Pages 261-300 in H. A. Mooney and R. J. Dobbs, eds. Invasive species in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island.
60. Zavaleta, E. S. and J. L. Royval. 2001. Climate change and the susceptibility of U.S. ecosystems to biological invasions: two cases of expected range expansion. Pages 277-342 in S. H. Schneider and T. L. Root, eds. Wildlife responses to climate change: North American case studies. Washington, DC: Island.