Establishment of zygomorphy on an ontogenic spiral and evolution of perianth in the tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 809-822

  Jabbour, Florian ^a,b   Ronse De Craene, Louis P ^c   Nadot, Sophie ^a   Damerval, Catherine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^c ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Delphinieae; Development; Evo devo; Evolution; Nectar spurs; Ontogenic spiral; Ranunculaceae; Zygomorphy

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT; GENE EXPRESSION; HERB; MORPHOLOGY; NECTAR; ONTOGENY; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATOR;

ACONITUM; ACONITUM NAPELLUS; AQUILEGIA; AQUILEGIA ALPINA; CLEMATIS RECTA; DELPHINIUM; DELPHINIUM GRANDIFLORUM; DELPHINIUM STAPHISAGRIA; NIGELLA DAMASCENA; RANUNCULACEAE;

EID: 70349606100     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp162     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Arber A. 1937. The interrelation of the flower: a study of some aspects of morphological thought. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 12: 157-184.
2. Bosch M, Waser NM. 1999. Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 871-879.
3. Broholm SK, Tähtiharju S, Laitinen RAE, Albert VA, Teeri TH, Elomaa P. 2008. A TCP domain transcription factor controls flower type specification along the radial axis of the Gerbera (Asteraceae) inflorescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 9117-9122.
4. Busch A, Zachgo S. 2007. Control of corolla monosymmetry in the Brassicaceae Iberis amara. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 16714-16719.
5. de Candolle AP. 1817. Considérations générales sur les fleurs doubles, et en particulier sur celles de la famille des Renonculacées. Mémoires de Physique et de Chimie de la Société d'Arcueil 3: 385-404.
6. Coen E, Meyerowitz E. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 34-37.
7. Cubas P. 2004. Floral zygomorphy, the recurring evolution of a successful trait. BioEssays 26: 1175-1184.
8. Dahlgren R, Rasmussen FN, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons: structure, function and taxonomy. Springer: Berlin.
9. Damerval C, Nadot S. 2007. Evolution of perianth and stamen characteristics with respect to floral symmetry in Ranunculales. Annals of Botany 100: 631-640.
10. Dong Z-C, Zhao Z, Liu C-W, et al. 2005. Floral patterning in Lotus japoni-cus. Plant Physiology 137: 1272-1282.
11. Douglas AW. 1997. The developmental basis of morphological diversification and synorganization in flowers of Conospermeae (Stirlingia and Conosperminae: Proteaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 158 (Suppl. 6): S13-S48.
12. Endress PK. 1987. Floral phyllotaxis and floral evolution. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 108: 417-438.
13. Endress PK. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 (Suppl. 6): S3-S23.
14. Endress PK. 2001. Origins of flower morphology. Journal of Experimental Zoology 291: 105-115.
15. Endress PK, Doyle JA. 2007. Floral phyllotaxis in basal angiosperms: development and evolution. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10: 52-57.
16. Ennos RA. 2008. Spurred on by pollinators. Heredity 100: 3-4.
17. Erbar C, Kusma S, Leins P. 1999. Development and interpretation of nectary organs in Ranunculaceae. Flora 194: 317-332.
18. Feng X, Zhao Z, Tian Z, et al. 2006. Control of petal shape and floral zygo-morphy in Lotus japonicus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 4970-4975.
19. Golz JF, Keck EJ, Hudson A. 2002. Spontaneous mutations in KNOX genes give rise to a novel floral structure in Antirrhinum. Current Biology 12: 512-522.
20. Guerrant EO. 1982. Neotenic evolution of Delphinium nudicaule (Ranunculaceae): a hummingbird-pollinated larkspur. Evolution 36: 699-712.
21. Hiepko P. 1965. Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschich- tliche untersuchungen über das perianth bei den Polycarpicae. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 84: 359-508.
22. Hirmer M. 1931. Zur Kenntnis der Schraubenstellungen im Pfanzenreich. Planta 14: 132-206.
23. Hodges SA. 1997. Floral nectar spurs and diversification. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158 (Suppl. 6): S81-S88.
24. Hodges SA, Arnold ML. 1995. Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 262: 343-348.
25. Hoot SB. 1991. Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on epidermal micro-characters and macromorphology. Systematic Botany 16: 741-755.
26. Hoot SB. 1995. Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on preliminary atpB, rbcL and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution Suppl. 9: 241-251.
27. Hoot SB. 2008. Phylogenetic position of the South American dioecious genus Hamadryas and related Ranunculeae (Ranunculaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 433-443.
28. Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ. 2006. Phylogenetic analyses of the 'ECE' (CYC/TB1) clade reveal duplications predating the core eudicots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 9101-9106.
29. Jabbour F, Damerval C, Nadot S. 2008. Evolutionary trends in the flowers of Asteridae: is polyandry an alternative to zygomorphy. Annals of Botany 102: 153-165.
30. Johansson JT, Jansen RK. 1993. Chloroplast DNA variation and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 187: 29-49.
31. Johnson SD. 2001. Hawkmoth pollination and hybridization in Delphinium leroyi (Ranunculaceae) on the Nyika Plateau, Malawi. Nordic Journal of Botany 21: 599-605.
32. Kita Y, Ito M. 2000. Nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences and phylogeny in East Asian Aconitum subgenus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae), with special reference to extensive polymorphism in individual plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution 225: 1-13.
33. Kosuge K. 1994. Petal evolution in Ranunculaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 8 (Suppl.): 195-1191
34. Kosuge K, Tamura M. 1988. Morphology of the petal in Aconitum. Botanical Magazine-Tokyo 101: 223-237.
35. Kosuge K, Tamura M. 1989. Ontogenic studies on petals of the Ranunculaceae. Journal of Japanese Botany 64: 65-74.
36. Kramer EM, Hall JC. 2005. Evolutionary dynamics of genes controlling floral development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 13-18.
37. Kramer EM, Irish VF. 1999. Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature 399: 144-148.
38. Kramer EM, Irish VF. 2000. Evolution of the petal and stamen developmental programs: evidence from comparative studies of the lower eudicots and basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl. 6): S29-S40.
39. Kramer EM, Di Stilio VS, Schlüter PM. 2003. Complex patterns of gene duplication in the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA lineages of the Ranunculaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 1-11.
40. Kramer EM, Dorit RL, Irish VF. 1998. Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149: 765-783.
41. Kramer EM, Holappa L, Gould B, Jaramillo MA, Setnikov D, Santiago PM. 2007. Elaboration of B gene function to include the identity of novel floral organs in the lower eudicot Aquilegia. The Plant Cell 19: 750-766.
42. Kunst L, Klenz JE, Mart́inez-Zapater J, Haughn GW. 1989. AP2 gene determines the identity of perianth organs in flowers of Arabidopsis thali-ana. The Plant Cell 1: 1195-1208.
43. Laverty TM. 1980. The flower-visiting behavior of bumblebees: floral complexity and learning. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58: 1324-1335.
44. Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794-799.
45. Luo Y, Zhang F-M, Yang Q-E. 2005. Phylogeny of Aconitum subgenus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) inferred from ITS sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 252: 11-25.
46. Maddison WP. 2000. Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. Journal of Theoretical Biology 202: 195-204.
47. Mair Ov. 1977. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte monosymmetrischer Dicotylen-blüten. Dissertationes Botanicae 38: 61-66.
48. Payer JB. 1857. Traité d'organogénie comparée de la fleur. Paris: Masson.
49. Masson. Rasmussen DA, Kramer EM, Zimmer EA. 2009. One size fits all? Molecular evidence for a common inherited petal identity program in Ranunculales. American Journal of Botany 96: 96-109.
50. Raup DM, Gould SJ, Schopf TJM, Simberloff DS. 1973. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. Journal of Geology 81: 525-542.
51. Ren Y, Li ZJ, Chang HL, Lei YJ, Lu AM. 2004. Floral development of Kingdonia (Ranunculaceae s.l., Ranunculales). Plant Systematics and Evolution 247: 145-153.
52. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF. 2001. Staminodes: their morphological and evolutionary significance. Botanical Review 67: 351-402
53. Ronse De Craene LP. 2003. The evolutionary significance of homeosis in flowers: a morphological perpective. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164 (Suppl. 5): S225-S235.
54. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF. 1994. Merosity in flowers-definition, origin, and taxonomic significance. Plant Systematics and Evolution 191: 83-104.
55. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF. 1995. Evolution of the androecium in the Ranunculiflorae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 9 (Suppl.): 63-70.
56. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF. 1996. The morphological variation and systematic value of stamen pairs in the Magnoliatae. Feddes Repertorium 107: 1-17.
57. Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ. 1994. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science 264: 1590-1593.
58. Sargent RD. 2004. Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271: 603-608.
59. Sattler R. 1973. Organogenesis of flowers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
60. Schöffel K. 1932. Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Ranunculaceen. Planta 17: 315-371.
61. Slowinski JB, Guyer C. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organis-mal diversity: an improved null model. American Naturalist 134: 907-921.
62. Slowinski JB, Guyer C. 1993. Testing whether certain traits have caused amplified diversification: an improved method based on a model of random speciation and extinction. American Naturalist 142: 1019-1024.
63. Smith H. 1928. Vascular anatomy of ranalian flowers. II. Ranunculaceae (continued), Menispermaceae, Calycanthaceae, Annonaceae. Botanical Gazette 85: 152-177.
64. Song P, Tian X-H, Ren Y. 2007. Floral morphogenesis of Caltha and Trollius (Ranunculaceae) and its systematic significance. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 45: 769-782.
65. Stevens P. 2001. onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, version 7. http ://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
66. Tamura M. 1965. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae IV. Scientific Reports of the Osaka University 14: 53-71.
67. Tamura M. 1984. Phylogenetical consideration on the Ranunculaceae. Korean Journal of Plant Taxon 14: 33-42.
68. Tamura M. 1993. Ranunculaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich Veds. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol.2. Berlin: Springer, 563-583.
69. Tepfer S. 1953. Floral anatomy and ontogeny in Aquilegia formosa var. trun-cata and Ranunculus repens. University of California Publications in Botany 25: 513-648.
70. Thostesen AM, Olesen JM. 1996. Pollen removal and deposition by specialist and generalist bumblebees in Aconitum septentrionale. Oikos 77: 77-84.
71. Troll W. 1928. Organisation und Gestalt im Bereich der Blüte. Berlin: Springer.
72. Tucker SC. 1997. Floral evolution, development, and convergence: the hierarchical-significance hypothesis. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158 (Suppl. 6): S143-S161.
73. Tucker SC. 2003. Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiology 131: 911-926.
74. Tucker SC, Hodges SA. 2005. Floral ontogeny of Aquilegia, Semiaquilegia, and Enemion (Ranunculaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 557-574.
75. Utelli AB, Roy BA, Baltisberger M. 2000. Molecular and morphological analyses of European Aconitum species (Ranunculaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 224: 195-212.
76. Vincent CA, Coen ES. 2004. A temporal and morphological framework for flower development in Antirrhinum majus. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 681-690.
77. Watson L, Dallwitz MJ. 1992. The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval, version 1st June 2007. http://delta-intkey.com.
78. Weber A. 1995. Pollination of Nigella arvensis (Ranunculaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution Suppl. 9: 325-326.
79. Whittall JB, Hodges SA. 2007. Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature Letters 447: 406-409.
80. Williams CF, Ruvinsky J, Scott PE, Hews DK. 2001. Pollination, breeding system and genetic structure in two sympatric Delphinium (Ranunculaceae) species. American Journal of Botany 88: 1623-1633.
81. Zhang TF, Duan YW, Liu JQ. 2006. Pollination ecology of Aconitum gym-nandrum (Ranunculaceae) at two sites with different altitudes. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 44: 362-370.