Nationalist versus dependent capitalist development: Alternate pathways of Asia and Latin America in a globalized world

Studies in Comparative International Development

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 386-410

  Kohli, Atul ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capitalist development; Economic performance; Washington consensus

Indexed keywords

CAPITALISM; DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; GLOBALIZATION; NATIONALISM;

ASIA; EURASIA; LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 70349596805     PISSN: 00393606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12116-009-9048-x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amann E, Werner B. Economic orthodoxy versus social development: The dilemmas facing Brazil's labour government. Oxf Dev Stud. 2006;34(2):219-41.
2. Amsden AH. Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
3. Bornschier V, Chase-Dunn C. Transnational corporations and underdevelopment. New York: Praeger; 1985. p. 156-9.
4. Branstetter L, Lardy NR. China's embrace of globalization. In: Laven B, Thomas GR, editors. China's great economic transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 633-82.
5. Cardoso FH. Associated-dependent development. In: Stepan A, editor. Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, policies, and future. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1973.
6. Cardoso FH, Faletto E. Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1979.
7. Chang H-J. Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem; 2003.
8. Eichengreen B, Duck-Koo C, editors. The Korean economy: Beyond the crisis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 2004.
9. Evans P. Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1979.
10. Evans P. Class, state, and dependence in East Asia: Some lessons for Latin Americanists. In: Deyo FC, editor. The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1986. p. 203-26.
11. Evans P. Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1995.
12. Fields GS. Distribution and development: A new look at the developing world. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001.
13. Firebaugh G. Growth effects of foreign and direct investment. Am J Soc. 1992;98:105-30.
14. Fishlow A. "Some reflections on comparative Latin American economic performance and policy," Wider Working Papers; 1987.
15. Johnson C. Peasant nationalism and communist power: The emergence of revolutionary China. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1962.
16. Johnson C. Political institutions and economic performance. In: Fredric D, editor. The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1986.
17. Hart-Landsberg M. Rush to development: Economic change and political struggle in South Korea. New York: Monthly Review Press; 1993.
18. Kohli A. State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
19. Kohli A. "Politics of economic growth in India, 1980-2005," Economic and political weekly, (in two parts), April 1 and April 8, 2006.
20. Krieckhaus J. Dictating development: How Europe shaped the global periphery. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2006.
21. Newcombe H, et al. United Nations voting. Int Organ. 1970;24(2):100-21. Winter.
22. Nayar BR. India's mixed economy: The role of ideology and interest in its development. Popular Prakashan: Bombay; 1989.
23. Nguyen NA, Nguyen T. "Foreign direct investment in Vietnam," Munich Personal RePEC Archive, paper number 1921, 2007 (http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/1921/).
24. Rodriguez, CA. Differences in the economic development of Latin America and East Asian countries. Paper presented at a conference of the Latin America-Caribbean and Asia-Pacific Economic and Business Association (LAEBA), Tokyo; 2003).
25. Rodrik D, editor. In search of prosperity: Analytic narratives on economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2003.
26. Sachs J. External debt and macroeconomic performance in Latin America and East Asia. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1985;2:523-64.
27. Schurmann F. Ideology and organization in communist China. University of California Press: Berkeley; 1968.
28. Skidmore T. Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An experiment in democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1967.
29. Solimano A. Vanishing growth in Latin America: The late twentieth century experience. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 2006.
30. Stallings B, editor. Global change, regional response: The new international context of development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
31. Stallings B, Peres W. Growth employment and equity: The impact of the economic reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington: Brookings Institution Press; 2000.
32. Stiglitz J. Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton; 2003.
33. Serra N, Stiglitz JE, editors. Washington consensus reconsidered: Toward new global governance. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
34. Tai H-C. Land reform and politics: A comparative analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1974.
35. United Nations. Human development report. New York: United Nations; 2007.
36. Velde DW. Foreign direct investment and income inequality in Latin America. Overseas Development Institute: 2003 (unpublished; available on the web).
37. Wade R. Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.
38. Williamson J. Latin American adjustment: How much has happened?. Washington: Institute for International Economics; 1990.
39. Wong J. Healthy democracies: Welfare politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2004.
40. World Bank. World development report. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.
41. World Bank. Economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform. Washington: World Bank; 2005.
42. World Bank. World development indicators. Washington: World Bank; 2007.