A proposal for a new accident analysis method and its application to a catastrophic railway accident in Japan

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 187-204

  Niwa, Yuji ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accident analysis; Genotype; Human reliability analysis; MTO; PG diagram; Phenotype; Railway accident; Risk

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; MTO; PG-DIAGRAM; PHENOTYPE; RAILWAY ACCIDENT;

QUALITY ASSURANCE; RAILROADS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS;

RAILROAD ACCIDENTS;

EID: 70349587868     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-008-0112-5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bainbridge L (1987) Irony of automation. In: Rasumussen J, Dunkan K, Leplat J (eds) New technology and human error. Wiley, London
2. Cacciabue P (2005) Human error risk management technology for safety audit of a large railway organisations. Appl Ergon 36:709-718
3. Caird JK, Creaser JI, Edwards CJ, Dewar RE (2002) A human factors analysis of highway-railway grade crossing accidents in Canada. Transport Canada Publication, TP 13938E
4. Chaali-Djelassi A, Vanderhaegen F, Cacciabue P, Cassani M (2007) Barrier removal prediction based on a new approach. Application to a degraded train speed procedure. In: 26th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, Copenhagen
5. Chang Z, Polet P, Vanderhaegen F (2002) Toward a decision making support of barrier removal. In: 21st European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Control (EAM2002), Glasgow
6. Edwards E (1988) Introductory overview. In: Wiener EL, Nagel DC (eds) Human factors in aviation. Academic Press, New York
7. Gofuku A, Ohi T, Ito K, Niwa Y (2004) Dynamic operation permission system based on operation procedure as a co-operator. Trans Hum Interface Soc 6(1):29-39
8. Fujita Y (1994) The bloom generation will destroy Japan (in Japanese). Waseda Publishing, Tokyo
9. Hall JL (2003) Columbia and challenger: organizational failure at NASA. Space Policy 19:239-247
10. Hayashi T (1986) Technology and society: Japanese experience, vol 4. Case study, traffic. Development in technology road, railway, and marine transportation of industrial engineering,United Nations University
11. Hollnagel E (1998) Cognitive reliability and error analysis method. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
12. Hollnagel E (2004) Barrier analysis and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot
13. Hollnagel E (2006a) "CREAM Accident Analysis" phenotypes and genotypes, In Preprint of advanced risk management course lectures for Yokohama National University
14. Hollnagel E (2006b) Resilience engineering and safety management. In: Handout of the Open Seminar in Yokohama National University, ETTO literature to be published
15. Ikeda K (1983) Gouldner's theory of the new class and culture of critical discourse (in Japanese). Hyogo Univ Teach Educ J 2:49-62
16. Japanese Learned Club (2005) Thorough comparison. Kanto people and Kansai people (in Japanese). PHP pocket edition "from the character to the favor of food, clothing, and housing"
17. Japanese Industrial Standard, Japanese Standard Association (1995) JIS E 6005 Railway rolling stock, automatic train control and automatic train stop devise on board, test method
18. Jo S (2006) Why does the young person resign in three years from a company? The future of Japan seniority order destroys (in Japanese). Ko-bunsha publishing, Tokyo
19. JR Fukuchiyama line derailment tune final report (2007) The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport RA-2007-3-1
20. Kato N (1999) No thought of Japan (in Japanese). Heibonsha Publishing New Book, Tokyo
21. Kawakida J (1967) Conception-For the creativity development (in Japanese). Chuko publishing New Book
22. Kawano R (1999) Human error reduction technique: approach by error proof (In Japanese). J Jpn Plant Hum Factors Soc 4:121-130
23. Kenko Y (1330) Tsurezure-gusa (Essays in pastime) (In ancient Japanese). Episode No. 140, 142, 165
24. Le Bot P (2004) Human reliability data, human error and accident models-illustration through the Three Mile Island accident analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83(2):153-167
25. Mainichi Shimbun Science Environment Division (2006) The science course white paper (in Japanese). Kodansha Publishing, Tokyo
26. Masayoshi S, Miyaji Y (2004) Human factors analysis by Railway Technical Institute (in Japanese). In: Proceedings of Reliability Engineering Association of Japan, No.12
27. McCormick J (1986) Reliability and risk analysis, reliability. IEEE Trans 35(3):300-303
28. Ministry of Land (2006) Infrastructure and transport airlines and railway accident panel. Drought of report concerning factual survey (in Japanese). Drought report
29. Miyamoto M (2002) Safety in Railway-beginning of a book occasional thoughts, Nihon Sharyo Association of Mechanical Technology (in Japanese). R&m 9(2):2-3
30. Nakajima M (2005) Examination of fact and trial example of "Nikkin-Kyoiku" (in Japanese), Labor laws law ten-day report 1613
31. Okumura R (2006) Idea of cohabitation in aging society (in Japanese). Research note of Mitsubishi Research Institute, No. 45:142-154
32. PHP Institute learned club (2001), Japanese data match 100th "Kanto" and "Kansai" interest of the confrontation (in Japanese)
33. Polet P, Vanderhaegen F, Wieringa P (2002) Theory of safety related violation of system barriers. Cogn Technol Work 4(3):171-179
34. Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, New York
35. Ryo H, Moteki K (2007) Ethics of Japanese spirit and capitalism (in Japanese). Gento-sha publishing New book, Tokyo
36. Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accident.Ashgate, Aldershot
37. Sakaiya T (1980) "Nodule"-the bloom generation (in Japanese). Bungei-shunju Publishing, Tokyo
38. Sheridan T (1992) Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. MIT Press, Cambridge
39. Shimura K (1992) Experiential-culture theory of Japan-U.S. friction. Maruzen Publishing, Tokyo
40. Swain A, Guttman H (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278
41. Takahashi S (2006) Slow carrier (in Japanese). PHP Institute, Tokyo
42. Takase T, Hagio C, Hirota T, Oh-nishi M, Yosano Y, Hayashi N, Iwahashi K, Ito S, Morita M (2007) Social change and Kansai activation (in Japanese), Institute of Economic and Political Studies, Kansai University Research library No. 144
43. Ueno S (2007) The background of the cause of the JR Fukuchiyama line accident: From the aspect of the human factors (in Japanese). In Web Research Report of Mitsubishi Research Institute. http://safety.mri.co.jp/ssu_hp/ssu/report/02_04.html (Uploaded in 2005)
44. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1999) NUREG-1624, Revision 1, Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA)
45. Wakabayashi K (1999) Key management and management consulting trends in the US, Journal of Mitsubishi Research Institute No.34
46. Wilson J, Norris B (2005a) Editorial: CTW special issue on rail human factors. Cogn Technol Work 8(2):2-3
47. Wilson J, Norris B (2005b) Rail human factors. Ashgate, Aldershot
48. Yamada M (1992) Voluntary difference society (in Japanese)
49. Yamaguchi M (2001) Rail (in Japanese), No 43. Eriei Publishing, Tokyo