Postural and spatial orientation driven by virtual reality

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 145, Issue , 2009, Pages 209-228

  Keshner, Emily A ^a,b   Kenyon, Robert V ^c  

^a Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Practice   (United States)

^b Temple University   (United States)

^c 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

Author keywords

Multi modal immersion; Perception; Posture platform; Visual vestibular conflict

Indexed keywords

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VISION; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

3-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; MULTI-MODAL; POSTURE PLATFORM; REHABILITATION OUTCOMES; SPATIAL ORIENTATIONS; VESTIBULO-OCULAR REFLEX; VISUAL-VESTIBULAR CONFLICT;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; POSTURE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70349578816     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-018-6-209     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. L.R. Young, Vestibular reactions to spaceflight: human factors issues, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 71 (2000), A100-4.
2. F.O. Black, C. Wall, and L.M. Nashner, Effects of visual and support surface orientation references upon postural control in vestibular deficient subjects, Acta Otolaryngology 95 (1983), 199-201.
3. E.A. Keshner, J.H. Allum, and C.R. Pfaltz, Postural coactivation and adaptation in the sway stabilizing responses of normals and patients with bilateral vestibular deficit, Experimental Brain Research 69 (1987), 77-92.
4. F.B. Horak, and L.M. Nashner, Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations, Journal of Neurophysiology 55 (1986), 1369-81.
5. K.S. Oie, T. Kiemel, and J.J. Jeka, Multisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture, Cognitive Brain Research 14 (2002), 164-76.
6. R.J. Peterka, Sensorimotor integration in human postural control, Journal of Neurophysiology 88 (2002), 1097-118.
7. Stratton, and G.M., Vision without inversion of the retinal image, Psychological Review 4 (1987), 463-81.
8. C.M. Oman, O.L. Bock, and J.K. Huang, Visually induced self-motion sensation adapts rapidly to left-right visual reversal, Science 209 (1980), 706-8.
9. J. Dichgans, and T. Brandt, Visual-vestibular interaction and motion perception, British Journal of Ophthalmology 82 (1972), 327-38.
10. L.R. Young, C.M. Oman, D.G. Watt, K.E. Money, B.K. Lichtenberg, R.V. Kenyon, and A.P. Arrott, M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 1 Sensory adaptation to weightlessness and readaptation to one-g: an overview, Experimental Brain Research 64 (1986), 291-98.
11. S. Weghorst, J. Prothero, T. Furness, D. Anson, and T. Riess, Virtual images in the treatment of Parkinson's disease akinesia, in K. Morgan, R.M. Satvara, H.B. Sieburg, R. Matheus, and J.P. Christensens (Eds), Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II 30, 1995, pp. 242-43.
12. C.C. Ormsby, and L. Young, Perception of static orientation in a constant gravitoinertial environment, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 47 (1976), 159-64.
13. W. Sadowski, and K. Stanney, Presence in Virtual Environments, in Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, K.M. Stanney, Ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2002, pp. 791-806.
14. M. Slater, Presence - the view from Marina del Rey, http://www.presence- thoughts.blogspot.com/, 2008.
15. C.E. Lathan, M.R. Tracey, M.M. Sebrechts, D.M. Clawson, and G.A. Higgins, Using Virtual Environments as Training Simulators: Measuring Transfer, in K.M. Stanney, Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2002, pp. 403-14.
16. A.E. Thurrell, and A.M. Bronstein, Vection increases the magnitude and accuracy of visually evoked postural responses, Experimental Brain Research 147 (2002), 558-60.
17. C. Cruz-Neira, D. Sandin, T. Defanti, R. Kenyon, and J. Hart, The CAVE Audio-Visual Environment, ACM Transactions on Graphics 35 (1992), 65-72.
18. T. Swee Aw, M.J. Todd, and G.M. Halmagyi, Latency and initiation of the human vestibuloocular reflex to pulsed galvanic stimulation, Journal of Neurophysiology 96 (2006), 925-30.
19. E.A. Keshner, and R.V. Kenyon, Using immersive technology for postural research and rehabilitation, Assistive Technology 16 (2004), 54-62.
20. J. Dichgans, R. Held, L.R. Young, and T. Brandt, Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity, Science 178 (1972), 1217-19.
21. J. Streepey, R.V. Kenyon, and E.A. Keshner, Visual motion combined with base of support width reveals variable field dependency in healthy young adults, Experimental Brain Research 176 (2006), 182-87.
22. T.M. Dijkstra, G. Schoner, and C.C. Gielen, Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment, Experimental Brain Research 97 (1994), 477-86.
23. F.H. Previc, The effects of dynamic visual stimulation on perception and motor control, Journal of Vestibular Research 2 (1992), 285-95.
24. E.A. Keshner, M.H. Woollacott, and B. Debu, Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans, Experimental Brain Research 71 (1988), 455-66.
25. J.J. Buchanan, and F.B. Horak, Emergence of postural patterns as a function of vision and translation frequency, Journal of Neurophysiology 81 (1999), 2325-39.
26. J. Cutting, and P.M. Vishton, Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information About Depth, in Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Perception of Space and Motion, 2nd ed: Academic Press, 1995, pp. 69-117.
27. J. Streepey, R.V. Kenyon, and E.A. Keshner, Field of view and base of support width influence postural responses to visual stimuli during quiet stance, Gait and Posture 25 (2006), 49-55.
28. A.D. Kuo, R.A. Speers, R.J. Peterka, and F.B. Horak, Effect of altered sensory conditions on multivariate descriptors of human postural sway, Experimental Brain Research 122 (1998), 185-95.
29. T. Mergner, and S. Glasauer, A simple model of vestibular canal-otolith signal fusion, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 871 (1999), 430-34.
30. T. Mergner, C. Maurer, and R.J. Peterka, A multisensory posture control model of human upright stance, Progress in Brain Research 142 (2003), 189-201.
31. T. Mergner, and T. Rosemeier, Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions-a conceptual model, Brain Research Reviews 28 (1998), 118-35.
32. F.H. Previc, R.V. Kenyon, E.R. Boer, and B.H. Johnson, The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception, Perceptual Psychophysics 54 (1993), 93-107.
33. E.A. Keshner, and R.V. Kenyon, The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses, Journal of Vestibular Research 10 (2000), 207-19.
34. D.A. Winter, A.E. Patla, J.S. Frank, and S.E. Walt, Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly, Physical Therapy 70 (1990), 340-47.
35. A. Gonshor, and G.M. Jones, Postural adaptation to prolonged optical reversal of vision in man, Brain Research 192 (1980), 239-48.
36. A. Thurrell, P. Bertholon, and A.M. Bronstein, Reorientation of a visually evoked postural response during passive whole body rotation, Experimental Brain Research 133 (2000), 229-32.
37. J. Dichgans, and T. Brandt, Visual-vestibular interaction: effects on self-motion perception and postural control., in R. Held, H.W. Leibowitz, and H.L. Teuber (Eds), Handbook of sensory physiology, New York, Springer, 1978, pp. 755-804.
38. H. Fushiki, S. Takata, and Y. Watanabe, Influence of fixation on circular vection, Journal of Vestibular Research 10 (2000), 151-55.
39. E.A. Keshner, K. Dokka, and R.V. Kenyon, Influences of the perception of self-motion on Postural parameters in a dynamic visual environment, Cyberpsychology and Behavior 9 (2006), 163-66.
40. J.R. Lackner, and P. DiZio, Visual stimulation affects the perception of voluntary leg movements during walking, Perception 17 (1988), 71-80.
41. E.A. Keshner, R.V. Kenyon, and J. Langston, Postural responses exhibit multisensory dependencies with discordant visual and support surface motion, Journal of Vestibular Research 14 (2004), 307-19.
42. E.A. Keshner, R.V. Kenyon, and Y. Dhaher, Postural research and rehabilitation in an immersive virtual environment, Conference Proceedings IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 7 (2004), 4862-65.
43. E.A. Keshner, R.V. Kenyon, Y.Y. Dhaher, and J.W. Streepey, Employing a virtual environment in postural research and rehabilitation to reveal the impact of visual information, International Journal on Disability and Human Development 4 (2005), 177-82.
44. T. Brandt, P. Bartenstein, A. Janek, and M. Dieterich, Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex, Brain 121 (9) (1998), 1749-58.
45. T. Brandt, S. Glasauer, T. Stephan, S. Bense, T.A. Yousry, A. Deutschlander, and M. Dieterich, Visual-vestibular and visuovisual cortical interaction: new insights from fMRI and pet, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 956 (2002), 230-41.
46. M. Dieterich, and T. Brandt, Brain activation studies on visual-vestibular and ocular motor interaction, Current Opinion in Neurology 13 (2000), 13-18.
47. A. Kleinschmidt, K.V. Thilo, C. Buchel, M.A. Gresty, A.M. Bronstein, and R.S. Frackowiak, Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion, Neuroimage 16 (2002), 873-82.
48. C. Xerri, L. Borel, J. Barthelemy, and M. Lacour, Synergistic interactions and functional working range of the visual and vestibular systems in postural control: neuronal correlates, Progress in Brain Research 76 (1988), 193-203.
49. K. Dokka, R. Kenyon, and E.A. Keshner, Influence of visual velocity on head stabilization, Society for Neuroscience (2006).
50. S. Lambrey, and A. Berthoz, Combination of conflicting visual and non-visual information for estimating actively performed body turns in virtual reality, International Journal of Psychophysiology 50 (2003), 101-15.
51. A.M. Bronstein, The visual vertigo syndrome, Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520 (1) (1995), 45-8.
52. E.A. Keshner, J. Streepey, Y. Dhaher, and T. Hain, Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 4 (2007), 24.
53. D. Gopher, and E. Donchin, Workload - An Examination of the Concept, in K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J.P. Thomas (Eds), Handbook of perception and human performance, New York, Wiley, 1986, pp. 41-1 - 41-49.
54. V.S. Gurfinkel, P. Ivanenko Yu, S. Levik Yu, and I.A. Babakova, Kinesthetic reference for human orthograde posture, Neuroscience 68 (1995), 229-43.
55. B. Isableu, T. Ohlmann, J. Cremieux, and B. Amblard, Selection of spatial frame of reference and postural control variability, Experimental Brain Research 114 (1997), 584-89.
56. B. Isableu, T. Ohlmann, J. Cremieux, and B. Amblard, Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control, Experimental Brain Research 150 (2003), 208-21.
57. J. Kluzik, F. B. Horak, and R.J. Peterka, Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface, Experimental Brain Research 162 (2005), 474-89.